بررسی دیدگاه اعضای هیئت علمی درخصوص وضعیت موجود شاخص‌های حوزه آموزش و پژوهش دانشگاه نسل چهارم در آموزش عالی ایران

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد رشته مدیریت و برنامه ریزی آموزش عالی، گروه علوم تربیتی دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی
2 استاد گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی تهران، ایران
3 دانشیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی تهران، ایران
چکیده
در دنیای متحول امروز بسیاری از دانشگاه ­های دنیا به سمت تحقق بخشیدن به شاخص ­های دانشگاه نسل چهارم حرکت کرده­اند. از حوزه­ های مهم دانشگاه­ ها که در حرکت به سمت این نسل دانشگاهی نقش برجسته ­ای دارند، حوزه آموزش و پژوهش است. هدف این پژوهش بررسی جایگاه شاخص ­های دانشگاه نسل چهارم در حوزه آموزش و پژوهش از دیدگاه اعضای هیئت علمی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی بود. روش پژوهش از نظر هدف، کاربردی و از نظر جمع‌آوری داده‌ها، کمّی از نوع پیمایشی بود. جامعه آماری اعضای هیئت علمی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی (پردیس ولنجک) در سال تحصیلی 1403-1402 به تعداد 603 نفر و حجم نمونه با استفاده از فرمول حجم نمونه آماری (فرمول کوکران) و با روش نمونه ­گیری طبقه ­ای نسبتی، 234 نفر بودند. ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات پرسشنامه محقق­ ساخته به تعداد 30 سؤال بود که بین اعضای هیئت علمی دانشگاه توزیع شد. به ­منظور بررسی اطمینان پرسشنامه از روایی محتوایی و صوری و برای محاسبه پایایی (قابلیت اعتماد) از روش آزمون آلفای کرونباخ استفاده شد. مقدار ضریب آلفای پرسشنامه 89 درصد به­ دست آمد. داده‌ها با استفاده از نسخه 26 نرم ­افزار SPSS و بهره ­گیری از آمار توصیفی (شاخص‌های مرکزی و پراکندگی) و آمار استنباطی (آزمون t تک نمونه‌ و آزمون علامت) تجزیه و تحلیل شد. نتایج بیانگر آن بود که از دیدگاه اعضای هیئت علمی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی جایگاه شاخص ­های دانشگاه نسل چهارم در آموزش عالی ایران در سطح متوسط است. به ­طور خاص، وضعیت این شاخص­ ها از جمله نسبت شاخص آموزشی توسعه دانش در سطح محلی، ملی و بین ­المللی و نسبت شاخص ­های پژوهشی همچون حمایت از شرکت­ های دانش ­بنیان در پارک­ های علم و فناوری و افزایش کارایی مراکز رشد و راه ­اندازی استارت­آپ­ های علمی و کاربردی در سطح مطلوبی قرار ندارد. البته، عوامل متعددی در تحقق این وضعیت دخیل بوده­اند که در جای خود قابل بررسی است. بررسی دیدگاه­ های اعضای هیئت علمی نشان داد که دانشگاه ­های ایران در تطابق با تحولات دنیای امروز باید در جهت تحقق هر چه سریع­ تر و با کیفیت ­تر شاخص­ های دانشگاه نسل چهارم به­ عنوان دانشگاه ­های پاسخگو و جامعه ­محور نقش ­آفرینی کنند و این مهم در دو بخش و بازوی عمده هر دانشگاه؛ یعنی آموزش و پژوهش امری اجتناب ناپذیر و بسیار ضروری است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Studying Faculty Members' Perspectives on the Current Status of Indicators in Education and Research for the Fourth Generation University in Iranian Higher Education

نویسندگان English

Majid Kahrazahi 1
Mahboubeh Arefi 2
Abasalt Khorasani 3
1 Master's student in Higher Education Management and Planning, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

In today's changing world, many universities around the world have moved towards realizing the indicators of the fourth generation university. One of the important areas of universities that plays a prominent role in moving towards this generation of universities is the field of education and research. The aim of this study is to examine the position of the indicators of the fourth generation university in the field of education and research from the perspective of the faculty members of Shahid Beheshti University. The research method is applied in terms of purpose and is a survey in terms of data collection. The statistical population in this study; faculty members of Shahid Beheshti University (Velenjak Campus) in the academic year 2023-2024, numbering 603 people, and the sample size was 234 people using the statistical sample size formula (Cochran formula) and the proportional stratified sampling method. The data collection tool was the use of a researcher-made questionnaire with 30 questions that was distributed among the faculty members of the university. In order to check the reliability of the questionnaire, content and face validity were used, and Cronbach's alpha test was used to calculate the reliability of the questionnaire. The alpha coefficient of the questionnaire was 89%. Data analysis from the questionnaire was performed using SPSS version 26 and descriptive statistics (central and dispersion indices) and inferential statistics (single-sample t-test and sign test). The results of data analysis indicated that from the perspective of the faculty members of Shahid Beheshti University, the position of the fourth generation university indicators in Iranian higher education is at an average level. In particular, the status of these indicators, including the ratio of the educational index to the development of knowledge at the local, national and international levels and the ratio of research indicators such as supporting knowledge-based companies in science and technology parks and increasing the efficiency of growth centers and launching scientific and applied startups, is not at a desirable level. Of course, several factors have been involved in the realization of this situation, which can be examined in their own right. A study of the views of the faculty members showed that Iranian universities, in accordance with the developments in today's world, must play a role in realizing the indicators of the fourth generation university as responsive and community-oriented universities as quickly and with the highest quality, and this is inevitable and very necessary in the two main sectors and arms of every university, namely education and research.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Higher education
Fourth Generation University
Education
Research
Faculty members
Iranian higher education.

References

Ahmadian Chashmi, M., Niazazari, K., & Salehi, M. (2019). Designing the role model of the fourth generation university in order to improve the quality of education and research in higher education. Development of Jundishapour Education, 11(4), 913-901. https://doi.org/10.22118/edc.2020.241717.1477
Alipour, A. (2022). Valuable Innovative University, moving towards the generation of university soft technologies. Iranian Islamic Development Model Studies, 10(2), 113-134. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.23295599.1401.10.2.8.4
Alipour, A., & Enayati, T. (2016). Commercialization of research of fourth generation universities. Quarterly Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies of Strategic Knowledge, 7(26), 53-76. https://doi.org/10.22047/ijee.2016.31970
Barnett, R. (2019). Ekologicheskij universitet. Osushchestvimaya utopiya [Ecological University: The Realized Utopia]. Tomsk: Izdatelskij Dom Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. https://jam.uok.ac.ir/article_64268_a9aa53c74f3f23be305ec89ac16b72f2.pdf
Beloev, H., & Venelinova, N. (2022, 7-8 March, 2022). A Roadmap for planning and implementing the Successful transition to fourth Generation University: The case of Ruse University, Bulgaria
16th International Technology, Education and Development Conference.
Blain, J. (2011). Training today, training tomorrow: An analysis of learning trends across Europe and global comparisons. https://rimag.ir/fa/Article/29319/FullText
Cham Asemani, M., Farasatkhah, M., & Khatami, S. H. (2024). Designing a Model of an Innovative University in Relation to Society: a Strategy for the Management and Development of Fourth-Generation Universities. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 15(1), 50-69. https://jedu.marvdasht.iau.ir/m/article_6342.html?lang=en
Darabi, M. (2022). Design and validation of a model for managing the quality of educational activities of university faculty members. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 3(28), 55-83. https://doi.org/10.52547/irphe.28.3.55
Derrida, J. (2005). The Future of the Profession or the Unconditional University (thanks to the "Humanities," What Could Take Place Tomorrow)
In Deconstructing Derrida: Tasks for New Humanities. In K. Peggy (Ed.), (pp. 11). New York: Palgrave-MacMillan. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/9781403980649_2?pdf=chapter%20toc
Eidi, N., Nourian, M., & Moghadasi, J. (2022). Curriculum Competencies of Bachelor's Degree in Petroleum Engineering with a Fourth Generation University Approach. Teaching & Learning Research, 17(72), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.22099/jsli.2021.6059
Enayati, T., & Alipour, A. (2013). Proposing the model of reproductive growth centers of academic humanities, moving towards the fourth generation universities. Roshd Technology Quarterly, 10(39), 20-28. http://www.roshdefanavari.ir/Article/20401
Etuk, G. K. (2015). Innovations in Nigerian Universities: Perspectives of An Insider from A "Fourth Generation" University. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(3), 218-234. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v4n3p218
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. 42(3), 293-337. https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002
Farasatkhah, M. (2018). Occasions of the University in Iran (New and Critical Discussions on Institutional Research, Science and Higher Education Studies). Tehran: Agah Publications.
Farasatkhah, M. (2022). Sometimes and sometimes the university in Iran (new and critical debates about the research university, studies of science and higher education, 5th edition). Tehran: Agah Publications. https://www.agahbookshop.com/
Farzaneh, M., Zeinabadi, H., EbrahimNaveh, & Abdollahi, B. (2023). Extracurricular Responsibilities of Faculty Members in the Context of a World-Class University: Introducing the Concept of Scientific Extraversion. Journal of Management and Planning In Educational System, 16(1), 65-96. https://doi.org/10.48308/mpes.2023.103237
Ghafarian Ghadim, M. (2021). A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy in Accounting Doctoral thesis, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Social Sciences, Imam Khomeini International University, Tehran]. https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir/#/articles/7952fce5564de2b62d8e80f3bbbe716c
Goodarzvand Chegini, M. (2018). The fourth generation university labor; and action approach (case studies: Cambridge, Stanford, and Harvard universities). Iranian Engineering Education Quarterly, 20(78), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.22047/ijee.2018.128487.1541
Irina, A. P. (2020). Revisiting Functions and Roles of the Entrepreneurial University in Social and Economic Systems in the Regional Context. In. https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/revisiting-functions-and-roles-of-the-entrepreneurial-university-in-social-and-economic-systems-in-the-regional-context/238509
Jahangiri-Fard, S., Shafizadeh, H., & Soleimani, N. (2021). Promoting Spiritual Health in the Fourth Generation University. Journal of Research in Religion and Health, 7(3), 110-193. https://doi.org/10.22037/jrrh.v7i3.34965
Khorsandi Taskoh, A., & Panahi, M. (2017). Critical analysis of international university ranking systems; Policy suggestions for Iran's higher education. Iran's Higher Education, 8(3), 11-136. http://ihej.ir/article-۱-۹۱۳-fa.html
Khoshnejad, Z., Salimi, M., Jahanian, R., & Abdulahi, M. (2022). Presenting the Fourth Generation University Model (Case Study: Islamic Azad University). Jundishapur Center for Studies and Development of Medical Sciences Quarterly, 13(1), 206-193. https://doi.org/10.22118/edc.2022.317210.1951
Mahdi, R., & Shafiee, M. (2017). Role creation and capacity building of fourth generation universities for local and regional development. Industry and University Quarterly, 10(53), 1-22. http://jiu.ir/Article/193
Mosadeghrad, A. M., & Isfahani, P. (2024). Towards fifth generation universities of medical sciences. Journal of the Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research, 23(6), 923-927. https://doi.org/10.61186/payesh.23.6.923
Mshvildadze, S. (2025). Education Reform and the Fourth Generation National Curriculum. Georgian Scientists, 7(2), 39-42. https://doi.org/10.52340/gs.2025.07.02.04
Nabipour, I. (2019). The fifth generation university: based on Carayanis and Campbell's pentagonal spiral model. Bimonthly Journal of Southern Medicine, 23(2), 165-194. https://doi.org/10.52547/ismj.23.2.165
Nesterov, A. Y. (2021). Problems of knowledge management at a Fourth-generation university. Baltic Humanitarian Journal, 10, 10.26140/bgz26143-22021-21001-20043. https://doi.org/10.26140/bgz3-2021-1001-0043
Pawlowski, K. (2012). The 'fourth generation university' as a creator of the local and regional development. Higher Education in Europe, 34(1), 51-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/03797720902747017
Pourezzat, A. A., Fathi, F., & Ghasemi, F. (2017). Imagery of excellence-oriented and knowledge-based libraries along the development of new generations of university. Academic Librarianship and Information Research, 51(4), 13-38. https://doi.org/10.22059/JLIB.2017.61316
Rezaei Noor, J., & Rouhanipour, S. M. (2022, Tehran - Sharif University of Technology, February 2022). Designing assistantship courses with the current approach of the fourth generation universities
The Fifth National Entrepreneurship Conference.
Rezaian fardoi, S., Hourali, M., & Behroozi, B. (2023). Assessing the status of Payame Noor University of Tehran in becoming the fourth generation of universities using fuzzy ANP technique. Social and Cultural Strategy, 12(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.22034/scs.2022.154828
Riabchenko, V., & Bulvinska, O. (2023). University Autonomy for Sustainable Development: Results of the times higher education Impact rankings 2022. Continuing Professional Education: Theory and Practice, 73, 77-86. https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2022.4.8
Sagitova, G. K., & Mukhamedzhanova, G. S. (2023). Features of the systematic approach of the organization of universities for the construction of the fourth generation: the Kazakhstan case. Central Asian Economic Review, 6, 18-29. https://doi.org/10.52821/2789-4401-2023-6-18-29
Seifi, E., Ahmadi, A., & Moazzami, M. (2024). Identifying the dimensions and components of the application of new technologies in the fourth generation university. Management and Educational Perspective, 5(4), 24-51. https://doi.org/10.22034/jmep.2024.426783.1282
Sepehri, Y., Liaghatdar, M. J., & Esfijani, A. (2021). Approaches and Methods of Teaching and Learning in Fourth Generation Universities from the Perspective of Faculty Members: A Qualitative Case Study. Studies in Learning & Instruction, 12(2), 137-161. https://doi.org/10.22099/jsli.2021.6059
Sotodeh Asl, N., Ghorbani, R., & Rashidy pour, A. L. (2014). Viewpoint of faculty members of Semnan University of Medical Sciences about research barriers. Koomesh, 16(1), 1-7. http://koomeshjournal.semums.ac.ir/article-1-2422-fa-html
Vaezi, H. (2020). Analyzing the Effective Factors on the Formation of Entrepreneurial Behavior of Students of Sistan and Baluchestan University
Master's Thesis in Entrepreneurship Management (New Business) Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Sistan and Baluchistan, Zahedan]. https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir/#/articles/960b10e65d033860447989d3f0407b64
Van Dalen, M. (2024). Educational Innovation in Transdisciplinary Hubs: Microcosms of the Fourth Generation University
Master's thesis of Philosophy of Science, Technology and Society University of Twente]. https://essay.utwente.nl/fileshare/file/102835/Van_Dalen_MA_BMS.pdf
Yadollahi Dehcheshmeh, A., Rajaipour, S., & Siadat, A. (2021). Developing a Fourth Generation Model for Iranian Universities. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies of the Humanities, 13(4), 31-57. https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2021.375
Zarin, A., Yadegarzadeh, G., Khosravi, M., Ghaderi, M., & Khorsandi taskoh, A. (2023). A Review of the Characteristics of Higher Education Curriculum in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Journal of Curriculum Research, 12(2), 52-74. https://doi.org/10.22099/JCR.2023.44027.2544
 

  • تاریخ دریافت 27 آذر 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 26 اردیبهشت 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 18 خرداد 1404
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 فروردین 1405