فصلنامه پژوهش و برنامه ریزی در آموزش عالی
مدلسازی ساختاری- تفسیری راهبردهای تحقق مأموریت آموزش در دانشگاه کارآفرین و جامعه‌محور
نویسنده
. استادیار، گروه اقتصاد علم، مرکز تحقیقات سیاست علمی کشور
چکیده
با توجه به اهمیت انتقال اقتصادها از اقتصاد منبع بنیان به دانش بنیان و متناسب با آن اهمیت نقش تحول دانشگاه ها در خصوص زمینه سازی باروری فعالیت های نوآورانه و کارآفرینانه، موضوع دانشگاه کارآفرین و راهبردهای لازم برای شکل گیری آن توجه بسیاری از پژوهشگران و سیاستگذاران حوزه آموزش عالی را جلب کرده است. در این میان، مأموریت آموزش، که از دیرباز جزو مأموریت های اصلی دانشگاه ها بوده است، نیازمند تحول و تکامل در جهت هماهنگی با نیازهای روز جامعه است. در این پژوهش برای شناسایی راهبردهای مؤثر و بیان روابط میان آنها به منظور تحقق مأموریت آموزش در دانشگاه کارآفرین، از مدلسازی ساختاری-تفسیری (ISM) استفاده شد. ابتدا با مطالعه نظام مند پژوهش های داخلی و استفاده از گروه کانونی، 23 راهبرد در تحقق مأموریت آموزش در مسیر جامعه محوری و کارآفرینی در دانشگاه ها شناسایی و از میان آنها روایی محتوایی 15 راهبرد تأیید و به عنوان اثرگذارترین راهبردها معرفی شدند. پس از تحلیل داده ها، راهبردها در چهار سطح مختلف طبقه بندی شدند و با توجه به روابط، نمودار ISM ترسیم شد. با بررسی ارتباط میان این راهبردها، این نکته قابل توجه است که تحقق اکثریت آنها بر تحقق دیگری تأثیر می گذارد و نیز تأثیر می پذیرد. از این رو، می توان نتیجه گرفت که سیاستگذاران، که هدف خود را تحقق جامعه محوری و کارآفرینی در دانشگاه و تحول ساختار آموزشی قرار داده اند، لازم است از نگاه خطی پرهیز کنند و با تکیه بر نگاه سیستماتیک اقدامات لازم را در تحقق کلیه راهبردهای ذکر شده انجام دهند. تعیین روابط میان راهبردها و نوع راهبردها می تواند به درک بهتر موضوع و اتخاذ سیاست ها و اقدامات مناسب در تحقق مأموریت آموزش در دانشگاه کارآفرین کمک کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Structural-interpretative modeling of strategies for achieving the mission of education in an entrepreneurial and community-oriented university
نویسنده [English]
- Mojgan Samandar Ali Eshtehardi
Assistant professor, Economics, Policy Evaluation & STI Monitoring, National Research Institute for Science Policy (NRISP), Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
Considering the importance of transitioning economies from a resource-based economy to a knowledge-based one, and the importance of the role of universities in the development of innovative and entrepreneurial activities, the subject of entrepreneurial university and the strategies necessary for its formation have attracted the attention of many researchers and policy makers in the field of higher education. Meanwhile, the education mission, which has always been one of the universities' main missions, needs transformation and evolution in order to coordinate with the daily needs of the society. In this research, structural-interpretive modeling (ISM) was used to identify effective strategies and express the relationships between them in order to fulfill the mission of education in the entrepreneurial university. First, by systematically studying internal researches and using a focus group, 23 strategies were identified in fulfilling the mission of education in the path of community-oriented and entrepreneurship in universities, and among them, the content validity of 15 strategies was confirmed and introduced as the most effective strategies. After analyzing the data, the strategies were classified into four different levels and the ISM graph was plotted according to the relationships. By examining the relationship between these strategies, it is noteworthy that the achievement of the majority of them affects and is also affected by the realization of others. Therefore, it can be concluded that the policy makers, who have set their goal to achieve community-oriented and entrepreneurship in the university and the transformation of the educational structure, need to avoid a linear view and based on a systematic view, take the necessary measures to realize all the mentioned strategies. Determining the relationships between strategies and the types of strategies can help to better understand the issue and adopt appropriate policies and actions to fulfill the mission of education in entrepreneurial university.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Education mission
- entrepreneurial university
- Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM)
- Iran
2. Alimiri, M. (2008). Entrepreneurship education: Its development and challenges. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 1(1), 133-169 [in Persian]. Retrieved from https://jed.ut.ac.ir/article_22440.html.
3. Almahry, F.F., Sarea, A.M., & Hamdan, A.M. (2018). A review paper on entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurs’ skills. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 21(1), 1-7. Retrieved from https:// www.abacademies.org/articles/a-review-paper-on-entrepreneurship-education-and-entrepreneurs-skills-7734.html.
4. Attri, R., Dev, N., & Sharma, V. (2013). Interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach: An overview. Research Journal of Management Sciences, 2(2), 3-8.
5. Ayre, C., & Scally, A.J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio: Revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47(1), 79-86. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808.
6. Bahramchoobin, M., Moshref Javadi, M., & Safari, A. (1395). Evaluating and ranking entrepreneurial university factors: Case of Isfahan Province Universities. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 9(4), 691-170 [in Persian]. Doi:10.22059/jed.2017. 61549.
7. Baradaran, M., Abedi, B., Khosravipour, B., Yaghobi, J., &Yazdanpanah, M. (2017). Developing a pattern to establish an entrepreneurial University of Agriculture and Natural Resources from perspective of agricultural education management. Journal of Agricultural Education Administration Research, 40, 123-139 [in Persian]. Doi:10.22092/jaear. 2017.108496.1321.
8. Behzadi, N., Razavi, S., & Hosseini, S. (2014). Designing a conceptual model for an entrepreneurial university; using corporate entrepreneurship approach. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 7(4), 697-713 [in Persian]. Doi:10.22059/JED.2014. 53625.
9. Benham-Hutchins, M., & Clancy, T.R. (2010). Social networks as embedded complex adaptive systems. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 40(9), 352-356. Doi:10.1097/NNA.0b013e3181ee42bc.
10. Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2006). Entpreprenerial universities and technology transfer: A conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 175-188.
11. Bernasconi, A. (2005). University entrepreneurship in a developing country: The case of the P. Universidad Católica de Chile, 1985–2000. Higher Education, 50(2), 247-274.
12. Boh, W.F., De-Haan, U., & Strom, R. (2016). University technology transfer through entrepreneurship: Faculty and students in spinoffs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(4), 661-669.
13. Clark, B.R. (1998). The entrepreneurial university: Demand and response. Tertiary Education and Management, 4(1), 5-16. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02679392.
14. Etzkowitz, H. (2017). The entrepreneurial university. In T.P. Shin J., Encyclopedia of international higher education systems and institutions. Dordrecht: Springer.
15. Fayolle, A., & Redford, D.T. (2014). Handbook on the entrepreneurial university. Edward Elgar Publishing.
16. Fayolle, A., & Gailly, B. (2015). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial attitudes and intention: Hysteresis and persistence. Journal of small business management, 53(1), 75-93. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12065.
17. Fazlifard, S., Lotfi Heravi, M. M., & Samandar Ali Eshtehardi, M. (2021). Awards to entrepreneurship and engagement in higher education. Science and Technology Policy Letters, [in Persian]. Retrieved from http://stpl.ristip.sharif.ir/article_22371.html?lang=en.
18. Fraser, A.G. (2012). The entrepreneurial university model, a modern day ideal: Issues, prospects and alternatives, for thedeveloping country. The Vivian Group.
19. Gibb, A. (2012). Exploring the synergistic potential in entrepreneurial university development: Towards the building of a strategic framework. Annals of Innovation & Entrepreneurship, 3(1), 1-21. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3402/aie.v3i0.17211.
20. Goudarzi, R., Hosseini, S., & Tabaian, S. (2019). Academic entrepreneurship development framework in the humanities in Iran. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 11(4), 661-679. Doi:10.22059/JED.2019.272159.652843.
21. Guerrero, M., Kirby, D.A., & Urbano, D. (2006). A literature review on entrepreneurial universities: An institutional approach. Autonomous University of Barcelona, Business Economics Department, Working Paper Series 06/8. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract_id=1838615.
22. Hägg, G., & Gabrielsson, J. (2019). A systematic literature review of the evolution of pedagogy in entrepreneurial education research. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(5), 829-861. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-04-2018-0272.
23. Hejazi, A., Nave Ebrahimi, A., Behrangi, M., & ZeinAbadi, H. (2015). Identification factors affecting the development of entrepreneurship higher education programs in Iran. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 6(1), 229-242 [in Persian]. Retrieved from http://jedu.miau.ac.ir/article_807.html?lang=fa.
24. Hosseini Largani, M. (2019). Designing an innovative curriculum model in Iran's higher education system: A qualitative study. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 25(3), 27-49 [in Persian]. Retrieved from http://journal. irphe.ac.ir/article-1-4024-fa.html.
25. Hosseini Nia, G., & Mosavi, S. (2018). Entrepreneurship training in universities: Methods and challenge. Higher Education Letter, 11(41), 59-88 [in Persian]. Retrieved from http://journal.sanjesh.org/ article_30941.html?lang=en.
26. Karimi, S. (2015). The use of business simulation games in agricultural entrepreneurship education. Intrepreneurship in Agriculture, 43-60 [in Persian]. Retrieved from https://jead.gau.ac.ir/article_2662.html? lang=fa.
27. Kirby, D.A., Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2011). Making universities more entrepreneurial: Development of a model. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 28(3), 302-316. Retrieved from https://doi.org/ 10.1002/cjas.220.
28. La Pa, A.I., Morales, M.A., & Alonso, N.C. (2006). Academic entrepreneurship in developing countries: The case of an Entrepreneurial Department. 8th Tripe Helix International Conference, (pp. 1-13).
29. Lazzeretti, L., & Tavoletti, E. (2005). Higher education excellence and local economic development: The case of the entrepreneurial university of Twente. European Planning Studies, 13(3), 475-493.
30. Leydesdorff, L., & Meyer, M. (2006). Triple Helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems: Introduction to the special issue. Research Policy, 35(10), 1441-1449.
31. Ministry of Science, R.A. (2020). Future of universities in Iran: Entreprenrial and societal. Tehran: National Research Institute for Science Policy (NRISP) [in Persian]. Retrieved from https://razi.ac.ir/documents/14962/315224/%D8%A2%DB%8C%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%87%20%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%B4%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%87%E2%80%8C%D9%87%D8%A7.pdf.
32. Mirzaie, Z., Soltani, A., & Motaharinezhad, H. (2018). Explaining the characteristics of the third generation university and examining their achievement in Iranian higher education: Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman case. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 24(3), 77-106 [in Persian]. Retrieved from http://journal.irphe.ac.ir/article-1-3880-fa.html.
33. Mok, K. H. (2013). The quest for an entrepreneurial university in East Asia: Impact on academics and administrators in higher education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14(1), 11-22.
34. Movahed Mohammadi, H., Shaeri, F., & Alambeigi, A. (2019). Supportive approaches to sustain entrepreneurial education in agricultural higher education from the experts' view, Iran. Journal of Agricultural Education Administration Research, 6(1), 229-242 [in Persian]. Doi:10.22092/JAEAR.2019.122266.1518.
35. Mowery, D.C., Nelson, R.R., Sampat, B.N., & Ziedonis, A.A. (2001). The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: An assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980. Research policy, 30(1), 99-119.
36. OECD. (2012). A guiding framework for entrepreneurial universities. Retrieved 08 14, 2019, from https://www.oecd.org/site/cfecpr/EC-OECD%20Entrepreneurial%20Universities%20Framework.pdf.
37. Ojaghi, S., Rezaee, B., Naderi, N., & Jafari, H. (2017). Entrepreneurship education system model with an emphasis on entrepreneurship education components. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Agriculture, 39-54. Doi: 10.22069/JEAD.2017.12102.1222.
38. Perkin, H. (2007). History of universities. In J.J.F., & F.G. Altbach, International handbook of higher education (pp. 159–205). Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4012-2.
39. Pittaway, L., & Cope, J. (2007). International small business journal. Entrepreneurship Education: A Systematic Review of the Evidence, 25(5), 479-510. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0266242607080656.
40. Rabbior, G. (1990). Elements of a successful entrepreneurship/ economics/education program. In Entrepreneurship education: Current developments, future directions (pp. 53-65). London: Quorum Books.
41. Rothaermel, F.T., Agung, S.D., & Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 691-791. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/ icc/dtm023.
42. Saghari, F., Ali Esmaeeli, A., & Hosseinzadeh, B. (2018). Investigating the effective factors on the development of entrepreneurship education in universities of Mazandaran province. Journal of Research in Educational System, 1029-1043 [in Persian]. Retrieved from http://www.jiera.ir/ article_65040.html?lang=fa.
43. Samandar Ali Eshtehardi, M., Goodarzi, M., & Ghorbani, M.H. (2022). Strategies to fulfill the mission of education in the entrepreneurial university: A framework synthesis and focus group study. Quarterly Journal of Strategic Studies of Public Policy.
44. Shah, S.I., Shahjehan, A., & Afsar, B. (2019). Determinants of entrepreneurial university culture under unfavorable conditions: Findings from a developing country. Higher Education Policy, 32(2), 249-271.
45. Sharifzadeh, M., Abdollahzadeh1, G., & Najafinejad, A. (2018). Case study of transition to entrepreneurial university: University as a micro ecosystem of microenterprise. Entrepreneurship in Agriculture, 5(2), 33-69 [in Persian]. Doi:10.22069/JEAD.2018.13518.1346.
46. Sirelkhatim, F., & Gangi, Y. (2015). Entrepreneurship education: A systematic literature review of curricula contents and teaching methods. Cogent Business & Management, 2(1), 1-11. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2015.1052034.
47. Sporn, B. (1999). Adaptive university structures: An analysis of adaptation to socioeconomic environments of US and European universities. London: Kingsley.
48. Tiemann, I., Fichter, K., & Geier, J. (2018). University support systems for sustainable entrepreneurship: Insights from explorative case studies. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 10(1), 83-110.
49. Zali, M., & Razavi, S. (2005). Analytical study of entrepreneurship education in universities. Journal of Executive Management, 16, 51-82 [in Persian]. Retrieved from http://jem.journals.umz. ac.ir/ article_241. tml?lang=fa.
)