فصلنامه پژوهش و برنامه ریزی در آموزش عالی
بررسی میزان پایبندی دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی به هنجارهای دانشگاهی و پسادانشگاهی
نویسندگان
1 دکتری بررسی مسائل اجتماعی ایران، دانشگاه کاشان
2 استاد گروه علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه کاشان
چکیده
در دهه های اخیر، هنجارهای علم بهعنوان الزامات نهادی محیط های علمی مد نظر اندیشمندان در جامعه شناسی علم قرار گرفته و در این خصوص بر مجموعه ای از هنجارهای دانشگاهی و پسادانشگاهی تأکید شده است. هدف اساسی این مطالعه بررسی میزان پایبندی دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی به هنجارهای علمی دانشگاهی و پسادانشگاهی تحت تأثیر جامعه پذیری علمی و به واسطه شکل گیری هویت دانشجویی در جامعه آماری مورد مطالعه بود. این مطالعه از نوع پیمایش اجتماعی بود و داده های تحقیق با استفاده از پرسشنامه جمع آوری شد. جامعه آماری شامل کلیه دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی دانشگاه های اصفهان، کاشان و هنر اصفهان بود که با استفاده از نرم افزار Sample Power تعداد 320 نفر به عنوان حجم نمونه تعیین شدند. اعتبار و روایی متغیرهای تحقیق با استفاده از ضریب پایایی ترکیبی و آلفای کرونباخ بررسی و تأیید شد. نتایج تحقیق تعهد دانشجویان به هنجارهای دانشگاهی و پسادانشگاهی را به ترتیب به میزان 3/19 و 9/40 درصد نشان داد. همچنین میزان تأثیر جامعه پذیری علمی بر تعهد دانشجویان به هنجارهای دانشگاهی و پسادانشگاهی به ترتیب برابر با 41 و 36 درصد و تأثیر هویت دانشجویی بر هنجارهای یادشده به ترتیب برابر با 27 و 29 درصد بود. با توجه به مقدار SRMR به دست آمده برای مدل پایبندی به هنجارهای دانشگاهی (09/0) و هنجارهای پسادانشگاهی (10/0)، می توان نتیجه گرفت که مدل برازش مطلوبی دارد. درمجموع، نتایج نشان داد که دانشجویان مورد مطالعه بیشتر به تعهد به هنجارهای پسادانشگاهی نسبت به تعهد به هنجارهای دانشگاهی تمایل نشان می‌دهند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Investigation the rate of postgraduate studentsâ commitment to academic and post academic norms
نویسندگان [English]
- Elham Shafaii Moghaddam 1
- Mohsen Niazi 2
1 Graduate student of social issues of Iran, Kashan University, Kashan, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Humanities - Social Sciences, Kashan University, Kashan, Iran.
چکیده [English]
In recent decades, science norms as institutional requirements of scientific occasions have been noticed by thinkers in sociology. In this regard, the collection of academic and post academic norms have been emphasized. The basic purpose of this study was to investigate the rate of postgraduate students’ commitment to academic and post academic norms influenced by scientific sociability and formation of academic identity in statistical population under study. This study was a social survey and research data were collected through questionnaire technique. Statistical population consisted of all postgraduate students in Isfahan, Kashan universities and Art University of Isfahan. Three hundred twenty people were selected by Sample Power software as a sample size. Validity and reliability of research variables were investigated and verified by compound reliability and Cronbach’s Alpha. The results of study indicated the rate of students’ commitment to academic and post academic norms 19.3 and 40.9, respectively. Moreover, the effect of scientific socialization on students' commitment to academic and postgraduate norms was equal to 41% and 36%, respectively, and the effect of student identity on the mentioned norms was equal to 27 % and 29%, respectively. According to achieved SRMR for the model of commitment to academic norms (0.09) and post academic norms (0.10), it can be concluded that the model has an optimal fitness. Overall, the results indicated that students studied are more inclined to commit to post academic norms than to commit to academic norms.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Academic Norms
- Post academic norms
- Scientific sociability
- Post-graduation
2. Bagheri Benjar, A., Moslehi Jenabian, N., & Beygi Malekabadi, B. (2016). Study of relationship between scientific communications and academic self-efficacy. Journal of Social Development, 10(2), 79-100 [in Persian].
3. Baqaei Sarabi, A., & Esmaili, M.J. (2009). Social factors affecting academic identity of students of Islamic Azad University. Social Science Research Letter, 10(4), 175- 203 [in Persian].
4. Brim, O.G., Jr. (1966). Socialization through the life cycle. In O.G. Brim, Jr., and S. Wheeler (Eds.). Socialization after childhood: Two essays (pp.1- 49), New York: Wiley.
5. Comprehensive Scientific Map of the Country (2000). Ministry of Science, Research and Technology [in Persian].
6. Crothers, C. (1987). Robert K. Merton, Cichester. London & New York: Ellis Horwood Limited & Tavistock P.
7. Farasatkhah, M. (2010). University and higher education; world perspectives and Iranian issues. Tehran: Ney Publishing [in Persian].
8. Ghaneii Rad, M.A., Maleki, A., & Mohammadi, Z. (2014). Cultural change in science: From academic to post-academic science. Journal of Iran Cultural Research, 6(4), 31-59 [in Persian].
9. Ghaneii Rad, M.A. (2003). Asynchrony of knowledge, science relations and socio-economic systems in Iran. Tehran: Scientific Policy Research Center [in Persian].
10. Ghaneii Rad, M.A. (2006). Status of the scientific community in the field of social sciences. Social Sciences Letter, No. 27, 56-27 [in Persian].
11. Ghazi Tabatabai, M., & Marjaei, S.H. (2001). A study of factors affecting the academic self-efficacy of master's and doctoral students of the University of Tehran. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, No. 19, 57-31 (in Persian).
12. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: Dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies, saga publications. London: thousand Oaks, New Delhi.
13. Hagstrom, W.O. (1975). The scientific community. Basic Books, Inc. New York/London.
14. Hurtado, S., Milem, J., Clayton-Pedersen, A., & Allen, W. (1999). Enacting diverse learning environments: Improving the climate for racial/ethnic diversity in higher education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 26 (8), Washington, DC: The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development.
15. Katz, J., & Hartnett, R. (Eds.). (1976). Scholars in the making. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
16. Kerckhoff, S. (1976). The status attainment process: Socialization or allocation. Social Forces, 55(2), 368-481.
17. Kuh, G.D., & Whitt, E.J. (1988). The invisible tapestry: Culture in American colleges and universities. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, No. 1. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
18. Manis, J., & Meltzer, B. (1968). Symbolic interaction: A reader in social psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
19. Marjaei, S.H. (2012). Investigating the status of science ethics in public universities affiliated to the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology of Iran. Final Research Report, Tehran: Department of Comparative Studies and Innovation in Higher Education, Institute for Research and Planning in Higher Education [in Persian].
20. Merton, R.K., & Barber, B. (1979). Sociological ambivalence, In L.A., Coser & Rosenberg (eds). Sociological Theory, A Book of Reading, New York, Macmillan Publishing Co: 541-565.
21. Merton, R.K. (1972). Insiders and outsiders: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge. American Journal of Sociology, 77(July), 9-47.
22. Oleson, V.L., & Whittaker, E. (1968). The silent dialogue: A study of the social psychology of professional socialization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Ondrack, D.A. (1975). Socialization in professional schools. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20(1), 91-103.
24. Rashid Haji Khwajehlu, S., & Hesampour, A. (2011). Towards a new paradigm of science: Some reflections on the trans-scientific nature of second model of production of science. Strategy for Culture, 4(14), 165 [in Persian].
25. Reinharz, S. (1979). On becoming a social scientis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26. Resnik, B. R (1998). The ethics of science. New York: Routledge.
27. Resnik, D. (1996). The corporate responsibility for basic research. Business and Society Review, 96, 57-60.
28. Shafaii Moghaddam, E. (2017). A study of the role of scientific socialization in the internalization of academic and postgraduate norms, Case study: Graduate Students of Isfahan State Universities in the Academic Year 2016-2017. (PhD Thesis). A Study of Social Issues in Iran, Kashan University [in Persian].
29. Thornton, R., & Nardi, P.M. (1975). The dynamics of role acquisition. American Journal of Sociology, 80(4), 870-885.
30. Tierney, W.G., & Rhoads, R.A. (1994). Faculty socialization as cultural process: A mirror of institutional commitment. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, No. 93-6, Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
31. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. Vedadhir, A.A. (1998). A study of factors affecting graduate students' adherence to Iranian norms and anti-norms of science. (Master's Thesis). University of Tabriz [in Persian].
33. Weidman, J.C., Twale, D.J., & Stein, E.L. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional student in higher education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 28 (3), Jossey-bass Wilery Company San Francisco.
34. Wheeler, S. (1966). The structure of formally organized socialization settings. In O.G. Brim, Jr., and S. Wheeler (Eds.). Socialization after childhood: Two essays (pp. 51-116), New York: Wiley.
35. Yousefi Aghdam, R. (2015). Temporary issue and development of professional identity of PhD students in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 17 (2), 65-101 [in Persian].
36. Ziman, J. (1996), Postacademic science: Constructing knowledge with networks and norms. Science Studies, 9 (1), 67-80.
)