فصلنامه پژوهش و برنامه ریزی در آموزش عالی
ارزشیابی کیفیت پایان‌نامه‌های دانش‌آموختگان کارشناسی ارشد رشته روانشناسی تربیتی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار گروه روانشناسی تربیتی دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران
2 دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی ارشد روانشناسی تربیتی دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران
3 استادیار گروه روانشناسی تربیتی دانشگاه الزهرا ،تهران، ایران
چکیده
هدف پژوهش حاضر ارزیابی کیفیت و شناسایی نقاط ضعف و قوت بخش‌های مختلف پایان‌نامه‌های کارشناسی ارشد رشته روانشناسی تربیتی دانشگاه‌های دولتی شهر تهران بود. روش پژوهش از نوع ارزشیابی و جامعه آماری شامل تمام پایان‌نامه‌های دوره کارشناسی ارشد رشته روانشناسی تربیتی دانشگاه‌های دولتی شهر تهران در دوره زمانی 1395-1392 بود که از میان آنها به طور تصادفی سه دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران و علامه طباطبایی انتخاب شدند. همچنین 90 پایاننامه به روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی طبقه‌ای انتخاب شدند. ابزار پژوهش چک‌لیست پژوهشگر ساخته و شامل 6 مؤلفه،30 شاخص و 83 نشانگر بود و روایی محتوایی لاوشی آن 92/0 و پایایی آن با فرمول پایایی بین کدگذاران(ICR) برابر80/0 به دست آمد. داده‌ها با استفاده از آمار توصیفی تجزیه و تحلیل شدند. یافته‌ها نشان داد که وضعیت 3/63 درصد از شاخص‌های پایان‌نامه‌های بررسی شده نامطلوب، 7/16 درصد کاملاً مطلوب، 10 درصد مطلوب، 7/6 درصد نسبتاً مطلوب و 3/3 درصد کاملاً نامطلوب است. همچنین در میان6 مؤلفه، وضعیت مؤلفه کلیات پژوهش نامطلوب، بحث و نتیجه‌گیری نامطلوب، بنیان نظری و پیشینه پژوهش مطلوب، روش‌های پژوهش مطلوب، مسائل بنیادی مطلوب و تحلیل یافته‌ها کاملاً مطلوب است. به‌منظور زمینه‌سازی برای بهبود کیفیت پایان‌‌نامه‌ها، پیشنهادهایی متناسب با ساختار و امکانات آموزشی فعلی ارائه شده است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Evaluating the quality of master degree thesis of Educational Psychology graduates
نویسندگان [English]
- Mahnaz Akhavan Tafti 1
- Farkhondeh Taheri Ghaletak 2
- Maryam Mohsenpour 3
1 Associate professor, Department of Educational Psychology, Alzahra Universities, Tehran, Iran.
2 Master student in Educational Psychology, Alzahra Universities, Tehran, Iran.
3 Assistant professor, Department of Educational Psychology, Alzahra Universities, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]
The purpose of the present research was to evaluate and identify the quality and the weaknesses and strengths of different sections of master's degree thesis in educational psychology at Tehran universities. The research method was evaluation and the statistical population included all the master's degree theses in the field of educational psychology at Tehran universities during the 2013-2016 academic year. Of these, Alzahra University, Tehran University, and Allameh Tabataba'ei University were randomly selected. Using stratified sampling, 90 thesis were randomly selected. The tool of research was a researcher made checklist including 6 components, 30 indicators and 83 variables. The Lavashi content validity was estimated at 0.92. The reliability correlation coefficient with the stability formula between coders (ICR) was calculated at 0.80. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.The findings showed that the status of 63/3% of thesis’s indicators were undesirable, 16/7% quite desirable, 10% desirable, 6/7% partly desirable and 3/3% quite undesirable. Also among the six components, the general status of the research component was undesirable, the discussion and conclusion was undesirable, the foundations and the history of the research was desirable, the research methods desirable, the theoretical basis issues were desirable and the analysis of the findings was quite desirable. In order to improve the quality of the thesis, suggestions were made to suit the current educational structure and facilities.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Evaluation
- Quality of thesis
- Educational Psychology
2. Alidousti, S., & Saberi, M. (2007). Theses and electronic dissertation of the new generation of scientific documents. Quarterly Journal Book, 70 (2), 85-98 [in Persian].
3. Alishiri Gh. H., Fakhr Jahani, F., Rokhsarizadeh, H., Miri, S.M., Helisaz, M.T., & Hussyni, S.M. (2010). Evaluation of medical alumni dissertations of one of the medical sciences universities in principles of writing. Iranian Journal of Military Medicine, 12(2), 5-79[in Persian].
4. Aminpour, F., Kabiri, P., & Naji, H. (2008). Isfahan University of Medical Sciences: Two decades of scientific achievements. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 8(1), 164-173 [in Persian].
5. Asefzadeh, S., Akbarshahi, Sh., Hashemi, F., & Mashatan, M. (2008). Evaluation of specialized medical theses Qazvin University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, 17(67), 72-65 [in Persian].
6. Bazargan, A. (2001). Educational evaluation in educational sciences, its nature and territory. Tehran: Samt Publication [in Persian].
7. Barandak, M. (2012). Assessment of current teacher training/teacher training programs and the proposed program for recurrent apprenticeships from the structural point of view. (Ph.D. in Psychology). Alzahra University [in Persian].
8. Davami, M.H., Moeini, L., & Rafiee, M. (2001). Study of the principles of writing theses of Medical Graduates of Arak University of Medical Sciences from 1994 to 2000. Knowledge Rationale, 4(3), 23-31 [in Persian].
9. Delaware, A. (2016). Educational and pasychological research. Tehran: Virayesh Publication inatitute [in Persian].
10. Doulani, A., Taram, K., Hariri, N., Hassanzadeh, H.M.A., & Esmaeili, H. (2014). Assessing of Urmia University of Medical Sciences post graduate Ddissertations. Health in Manage, 11(2), 158-168[in Persian].
11. Fadaei, Gh. (2010). Thesis and dissertation academic researcher of research, writing and defense. Tehran: Organization for the Study and Compilation of Human Sciences Books of Universities (Samt), Humanities Research and Development Center [in Persian].
12. Fallahzadeh, H., Moheb, S., & Ezzedini, F. (2008). Evaluating the characteristics and structure of dentistry graduated students' theses in Shahid Sadughi University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 8(1)154 -156 [in Persian].
13. Farrokhi, N. A. (2010). Evaluation of Master's degree theses and Ph.D of Psychology and Educational Sciences. Allameh Tabatabaei University [in Persian].
14. Fathabadi, G. (2010). In a decade of publication of articles in the journal of education and training in the field of educational psychology (1399-88). Journal Education and Training, 110, 3-75 [in Persian].
15. Farasatkhah, M. (2009). Iranian university and quality issue. Tehran: Agah Publishing [in Persian].
16. Ferfolja, T., & Burnett, L. (2002). Getting started on your literature review. The Learning Centre, UNSW.
17. Ghanbari, L. (2007). Comparison of the quality of the offers and theses of master students from the point of view of qualitative management. (Master's degree of Theses). Alzahra University of Management Education [in Persian].
18. Hamidi, M.A. (2006). From scholarly feedback to educational alliance; a war of research writing by the Foundation. Tehran: Research Studies Education and Breeding [in Persian].
19. Hedjazi, Y., Bazargan, A., & Ishaqi, F. (2008). Guide quality internal evaluation in the university system. Tehran: University of Tehran Press [in Persian].
20. Hooman, H.A. (2007). Understanding the scientific method in behavioral sciences. Tehran: Samt Publication [in Persian].
21. Hounsell, D. (2007). Contrastting conception of essay-writing. The experience of learning. Sottish Academic Press, Edinburgh, 106-125.
22. Iranshahi, N. (2015). Study of the relationship teacher’s evaluation and educational function of high school students. (Theses Master's in Educational Psychology). Alzahra University [in Persian].
23. Kadivar, P. (2006). Educational psychology. Tehran: Samt Publication [in Persian].
24. Kashanchi Langroudi, N. (2011). Evaluation of the facilities, programs and functions of the boarding school students in Alborz province. (Master's degree in educational psychology theses). Alzahra University [in Persian].
25. Khademi, A.A., Tavangar, A., & Hosseinpour, K. (2012). Quality of dissertations of Isfahan Faculty of Dentistry during 2005-2009. Isfahan Dental Journal, 7(5), 785-791 [inPersian].
26. Khaki, Gh. R. (2005). Research methodology with an approach to writing thesis. Tehran: Country Scientific Research Center [in Persian].
27. Khosrowjerdi, M. (2013). Abstract APA style sheet (Sixth Edition). Retreived from https://sites.google.com/site/mkhosro/ [in Persian].
28. Kuhbumi, J., Azizi, F., Welayi, N., Rezaie, M., Mehraban, B., & Kahrezi, M. (2006). Investigating the status of research method indicators in Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences public prosecutor's theses (1367-1384). Journal Science and Research of Kermanshah University of Medical, 10(2), 177-186 [in Persian].
29. Lekwa, A., & Ysseldyke, J. (2010). Dissertation in school psychology: Changes in topics and methodology over the past 25 years. Journal of Applied School.
30. Lotfabadi, H. (2008). Educational psychology in Iran and the West; past, present and future. Journal of Education, 24(4), 96 [in Persian].
31. Mosapour, N.O., & Alavi, H.R. (2006). Academic writing a guide to writing and writing, research papers, thesis, dissertation, research report, Kerman. Shahid Bahonar University Publishing [in Persian].
32. Nili, M.R., Nasr, A.R., & Akbari, N.O. (2007). Reviewing the quality of guidance for graduate theses. Shahed University's Science and Research Bimonthly, 14 (24), 111-122 [in Persian].
33. Pak Nahad, M., (2011). Graduate curriculum evaluation master's degree of educational psychology: Goals, applications and achievements. Degree in Educational Psychology, Thesis at Al-Zahra University [in Persian].
34. Pashankhanloo, S. (2010). Evaluation of master's degree dissertations in faculty of psychology and educational sciences of Tarbiat Moalem University of Tehran during 2004-2008. Thesis Degree Program in Curriculum Development at Tarbiat Moalem University [in Persian].
35. Naveh Ebrahim, A., Mansourian, Y., & Rahimi, S. (2014). Assessing the quality of master's theses for teaching management in order to enhance the quality of academic learning. Journal of Management Future Studies, 25(100) [in Persian].
36. Rahimi, S. (2011). Evaluation of the quality of the master's theses of the educational management Tarbiat Moallem University. Master's degree in Management Education at Tarbiat Moalem University [in Persian].
37. Sadeghi, T., Noohi, E., & Ghahramanian, A. (2011). Evaluation of the theses structure and observance of scientific writing priniciples by MSc nursing students studying at Kerman University of Medical Sciences. J. Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci, 10(Supll), 91-102 [in Persian].
38. Salehi, P., Ghani Dehkordi, J., Parvin, N., Nekoie Ghahfarokhi, E., Rafei Vardanjani, L., & Kianpour, A. (2014). The accuracy of citations in medicine and master degree dissertations, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, 2006- 2012. Journal of Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, 16 (5), 100-106 [in Persian].
39. Sarmad, Z., Bazargan, A., & Hedjazi, E. (2011). Behavioral sciences research. Tehran: Agah Publishing [in Persian].
40. Seif Naraghi, M., & Naderi, E. (2012). Research methods and its evaluation in human (with emphasis on educational sciences). Tehran: Arasbaran Publication [in Persian].
41. Seyedin, S.M., & Babalhavaeji, F. (2009). Content analysis of Master thesis dissertation in the department of information science, Islamic Azad University of North Tehran Branches. Sciences and Researches of Tehran, Sciences and Researches of Ahvaz and Hamedan in the years 1993-2007. Message of the Library, 15(1), 95-121 [in Persian].
42. Sharifi, H.P., & Sharifi, N. (2010). Behavioral sciences research. Tehran: Sokhan Publications [in Persian].
43. Toghyani, B., & Kianmehr, M. (2016). Comparative evaluation of thesis structure in two point time of 2006-2010 and 2011-2015, School of Medical, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran. J. Isfahan Med Sch, 34(404), 1268-74 [in Persian].
44. Turner, R.P. (1965). Tecnical report writing. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
)