ارائه مدلی به منظور تحلیل توسعه دانشگاه های منطقه ای با استفاده از رویکرد مدلسازی ساختاری- تفسیری

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت آموزشی دانشکده علوم انسانی دانشگاه آزاد سبزوار

2 استادیار دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی دانشگاه حکیم سبزواری

چکیده

امروزه، روابط علت و معلولی بین دانشگاه‌ها و مناطق حاکی از آن است که در صورت هم ­افزایی بین نظام دانشگاهی و منطقه‌ای ارزش افزوده نصیب هر دو طرف خواهد شد. هدف پژوهش حاضر ارائه مدل مناسب و کارآمد برای تحلیل توسعه روابط دانشگاه و منطقه بود. در این مطالعه از روش پژوهش ترکیبی از نوع طرح اکتشافی استفاده شد. در بخش کیفی از روش تحلیل مضمون با مصاحبه با 15 نفر از مطلعان و در بخش کمّی از رویکرد مدلسازی ساختاری- تفسیری(ISM) بهره برده شد. از آنجا که این رویکرد مبتنی بر نظر خبرگان است، از نظرهای 29 متخصص در حوزه دانشگاه و منطقه استفاده شد. نتایج به­ دست آمده به سطح ­بندی عوامل مؤثر بر توسعه روابط دانشگاه و منطقه و طراحی مدلی از این عوامل منجر شد. یافته ­ها نشان داد که توسعه پایدار و پژوهش­ محور، رابطه دانشگاه و منطقه و مدیریت راهبردی و توسعه­ گرا به ترتیب از مهم­ ترین عوامل در توسعه تعاملی دانشگاه و منطقه هستند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing a model for analyzing the development of regional universities by using Interpretative-Structural Modeling Approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • Malihe Rashidi 1
  • Amir Hossein Kayzouri 2

1 Master student in Educational Administration, Educational Sciences Department, Azad University of Sabzevar Branch

2 Faculty of Letters & Humanities, Hakim Sabzevari University

چکیده [English]

Today, causal relationships between universities and regions indicate that if there is synergy between the university system and the regional system, both sides will benefit from the value added. The purpose of this study was to present a suitable and efficient model for analyzing the development of university-region relations. In this study, mixed-exploratory research design method was used. In the qualitative part, the content analysis method was used by interviewing 15 informants. In the quantitative part, the structural-interpretive modeling (ISM) approach was used. Since this approach is based on expert opinion, the opinions of 29 experts in the field of academia and region were used. The results led to the classification of factors affecting the development of university-region relationships and the design of a model for these factors. The results of this research lead to the rating of the factors affecting the development of university-region relations and designing a model based in these factors. The findings also showed that sustainable and research-based development, university-region relationship, and strategic and development-oriented management are the most important factors in development of the university – region interactive development.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Regional university
  • Region
  • Interpretive Structural Modeling
1. Abonyi, U.K. (2016). Universities’ role in regional development: A case study of University for Development Studies, Ghana. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(26), 11-20.
2. Benneworth, P., & Jongbloed, B. (2010). Who matters to universities? A stakeholder perspective on humanities, arts and social sciences valorization. Higher Education, 59(5), 567-88.
3. Breznitz, S., & Feldman, M. (2010). The larger role of the university in economic development: Introduction to the special issue. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37, 135-8.
4. Chatterton, P., & Goddard, J. (2000). The response of higher education institutions to regional needs. European Journal of Education, 35(4), 27-32.
5. Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. First edition, Thousand Oaks, Sage Publication.
6. Daraki, A. (2013). The role of higher education in regional development (Case Study: Provinces of the country). (Doctoral dissertation). Faculty of Geography, Isfahan University (in Persian).
7. Elena-Perez, S., Pabollet, E.A., & Marinelli, E. (2017). The role of universities in regional development through smart specialization strategies: Evidence from two Spanish regions (Catalonia and Navarre). The Journal of Economies, (92), 42-67.
8. European Commission (2006). Community strategic guidelines on cohesion. Official Journal of the European Commission. 291/11 (21.10.2006) Brussels.
9. Florida, R. (1995). Towards the learning region. Futures, (5), 527-536.
10. Fongwa, S.N. (2010). The contribution of higher education to regional socio-economic development: The University of Buea, Cameroon, as a growth pole. (Unpublished M.Ed. dissertation). University of the Western Cape.
11. Goddard, J., & Puukka, J. (2008). The engagement of higher educational institutions in regional development: An overview of the opportunities and challenges. Higher Education Management and Policy, 20(2), 3-33.
12. Goddard, J.B., & Chatterton, P. (2003). The response of universities to regional needs. In F. Boekema, E. Kuypers and R. Rutten (Eds.). Economic geography of higher education: knowledge, infrastructure and learning regions. London: Routledge.
13. Hahne, U. (1985). Regionalentwicklung durch Aktivierung intraregionaler Potentiale-Zu den Chancen, endogener “Regionalentwicklung. Schriften des Instituts für Regionalforschung der Universität Kiel Band 8. München: V. Florentz.
14. Iran’s Higher Education Spatial Plan (2015). The policies and regulations governing higher education. Supreme Council for Cultural Revolution (in Persian).
15. Kettunen, J.(2004). The strategic evaluation of regional development agencies and knowledge economy: Harnessing the potential of universities. Environment and Planning, 17, 685-699.
16. Mahdi, R., & Shafiee, M. (2018). Role and capacity building of fourth generation universities for local and regional development. Journal of Industry and University, 10(35 and 36), 1-22 (in Persian).
17. Mehralizadeh, Y., Kord Zanganeh, A., & Homayoun Nia, A. (2012). Pathology of Iran's higher education spatial planning: An analysis of the experience of higher education before and after the Islamic revolution of Iran. Quarterly Journal of Iranian Higher Education Association, 5 (1), 93-132 (in Persian).
18. Nevyanc, A. (2009). Procedures about new dimension on contribution and vision. International Conference on Modeling New Economics Streams.
19. Nishat Faisal, M., Banwet, D.K., & Shankar, R. (2006). Supply chain risk mitigation: Modeling the enablers. Business Process Management Journal, 12(4), 535-552.
20. OECD (2007) Higher education and regions: globally competitive, locally engaged. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
21. Porter, M.E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York, U.A.: The Free Press.
22. Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
23. Samari, E., & Geraeenezhad, Gh. (2013). The conceptual status of higher education spatial planning in land use planning: A guideline for university development. Quarterly Journal of Iranian Higher Education Association, 5(3), 117-142 (in Persian).
24. Samari, E., Yamani, M., Salehi Omran, E., & Geraeenezhad, Gh. (2014). Investigating and identifying the effective factors in the process of university development in Iranian state universities. Journal Management System, 2(4), 68-90 (in Persian).
25. Schläger-Zirlik, P. (2003). Der Ansatz der Lernenden Region in der Stadt-und Regionalentwicklung-dargestellt am Beispiel der Übertragung des Stadtmarketinggedankens auf ausgewählte Städte in Transformationsländern. Bayreuth (Dissertation Universität Bayreuth).
26. Schnell, K., Scherer, R., & Held, Th. (2005). Wissensmanagement Regionaentwicklung Schweiz. Machbarkeitsstudie. Staatssekretariat Fur Wirtschaft. Bern.
27. Sternberg, R. (2001). New economic geography und neue regionale wachstumstheorie aus wirtschaftsgeographischer Sicht. In: Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, Jg. 45, Heft 3-4, 159-180.
28. Strauf, S., & Scherer, R. (2018). Universities and their contribution to regional development. Manuscript. University of St. Gallen.
29. Strauf, S., Scherer, R., & Bieger, T. (2007). The role of universities for regional labour markets: The example of central Switzerland. In Kopycinska, D. (ed.) (2007). The policy of the EU Member States in relation to labor market competitiveness. Economics & Competition Policy. Vol 9: Katedra Mikroekonomii Uniwersytetu Szczecinskiego. Szczecin.
30. Trippl, M., Sinozic, T., & Smith, H.L. (2015). The role of universities in regional development: Conceptual models and policy institutions in the UK, Sweden and Austria. European Planning Studies, 1-19.
31. U.S. News (2019). Best regional universities ranking. Retrieved from https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/regional-universities
32. United Nations Development Program (2007). www.undp.org
33. Yamani, M. (2001). An introduction to the study of academic performance. Shahid Beheshti University of Tehran Press (in Persian).
34. Yamani, M. (2012). Quality in higher education. Tehran. Samt Press (in Persian).