مرور نظام مند اخلاق و شناسایی چیستی آن در یادگیری مشارکتی از منظر دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی دانشگاه تهران

نویسندگان
1 استاد برنامه ریزی درسی، گروه روش ها و برنامه ریزی آموزشی و‌درسی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
2 دانشجوی دکتری برنامه ریزی درسی، گروه روش ها و برنامه ریزی آموزشی و‌ درسی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
10.61838/KMAN.IRPHE.32.2.8
چکیده
صرف تأکید بر یادگیری مشارکتی موجب تحقق آن در آموزش عالی نمی‌شود. ازاین‌رو، اخلاق در یادگیری مشارکتی دانشجویان- به‌عنوان حلقۀ میانجی تحقق یادگیری مشارکتی در آموزش عالی- اهمیت پیدا می‌کند؛ چرا که یادگیری مشارکتی مبتنی بر اصول اخلاقی‌ای است که اثربخشی یادگیری مشارکتی را تضمین می‌کنند. در این پژوهش بررسی پیشینۀ پژوهشی در دو مرحلۀ جداگانه انجام شد تا خلأ پژوهشی دقیق‌تر دیده شود. پژوهش با رویکرد چندروشی و با هدف کاربردی انجام شد. متناظر با دو سؤال، هدف اول فهم کلی از اخلاق در یادگیری مشارکتی دانشجویان بود و مؤلفه‌های مربوط به اخلاق در یادگیری مشارکتی دانشجویان در اسناد شناسایی شد. هدف دوم شناسایی چیستی اخلاق در یادگیری مشارکتی از منظر دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی دانشگاه تهران بود و اینکه دانشجویان مشارکت‌کننده در پژوهش چه تعریفی از اخلاق در یادگیری مشارکتی دارند. ازاین‌رو، دو سؤال جزئی مطرح شد. برای سؤال اول از روش مرور نظام­ مند و برای سؤال دوم از روش گروه کانونی بهره گرفته شد. مرور نظام ­مند با شیوۀ هفت مرحله‌ای رایت و همکاران انجام شد. از غربال 4017 مقاله، 29 مقاله انتخاب و تحلیل آنها با کدگذاری باز و اکتشافی (بالغ‌بر 1000 کد اولیه)، در 4 مضمون اصلی و 15 مضمون فرعی طبقه‌بندی شد. در گروه کانونی با 12 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد و دکتری دانشکدۀ روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی دانشگاه تهران مصاحبه شد. پاسخ سؤال دوم در 47 مضمون فرعی و 15 مضمون اصلی طبقه‌بندی شد. در بخش مروری، نگاه جامع‌تری به تعریف اخلاق در یادگیری مشارکتی شد که شامل تعریف، مبانی نظری، ارتباط، چالش‌ها و راهکارهای اخلاق در یادگیری مشارکتی می‌شد. در یافتۀ گروه کانونی، اخلاق در یادگیری مشارکتی از منظر دانشجویان علوم تربیتی بررسی شد. یافتۀ سؤال دوم نشان داد که دانشجویان بر اشتراک دانش و نداشتن بخل علمی تأکید کرده‌اند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

A systematic review of ethics in students' collaborative learning and identifying what ethics is in collaborative learning from the perspective of University of Tehrans’ students

نویسندگان English

Mohammad Reza Karamati 1
khatoon alipour 2
Sayyedeh Fatemeh Zare Sheikhkalai 2
1 Professor of Curriculum Development, Department of Methods and Educational Programs and Curriculum, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Ph.D. Candidate in Curriculum development, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Simply emphasizing collaborative learning does not guarantee its realization in higher education. Therefore, ethics in students' collaborative learning – as a mediating link for realizing collaborative learning in higher education – becomes important because collaborative learning is based on ethical principles that also ensure the effectiveness of collaborative learning. We conducted a review of the research literature in two separate stages to more accurately identify the research gap. Therefore, the research was conducted with a mixed-methods approach and with an applied purpose. Corresponding to the two questions, in the first objective, we sought a general understanding of ethics in students' collaborative learning, and therefore, we identified components related to ethics in students' collaborative learning in documents. In the second objective, we sought to identify the nature of ethics in collaborative learning from the perspective of graduate students at the University of Tehran to know what definition students participating in the research have of ethics in collaborative learning. Therefore, we raised two specific questions, using a systematic review method for the first question and a focus group research method for the second question. The systematic review was conducted using Wright et al.'s seven-stage method. From screening 4017 articles, 29 articles were selected, the analysis of which was classified with open and exploratory coding (over 1000 initial codes) into 4 main themes and 15 sub-themes. In the focus group, we interviewed 12 master's and doctoral students from the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences at the University of Tehran. The answer to the second question was classified into 47 sub-themes and 15 main themes. In the review section, we had a more comprehensive look at the definition of ethics in collaborative learning, which included the definition, theoretical foundations, communication, challenges, and solutions of ethics in collaborative learning. In the focus group finding, we examined ethics in collaborative learning from the perspective of educational science students (because it had received less attention in the reviewed articles). The finding of the second question showed that students emphasized the sharing of knowledge and the absence of scientific stinginess.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Learning strategies
Educational Policies
Ethical responsibility
Learning and social commitment
Abirami, A. M., & Kiruthiga, P. (2018). Collaborative learning tools for data structures. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 31(3), 79-83. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2018/v31i3/16183
Agheorghiesei, D. T., & Poroch, V. (2016). Ethics by movie: An alternative ethics training method for future professionals. A pilot study among Romanian students. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, 53, 11-21. https://doi.org/10.33788/rcis.53.1
Alasti, K., Hatef, M., & Afshar, M. (2023). The study of the role of education in controlling scientific misconduct in Iran: using Grounded Theory. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 27(3), 23-52.
Alwahaishi, S. (2020). Influence of work-based learning on students' ethical orientation. 2020 International Conference on Innovation and Intelligence for Informatics, Computing and Technologies (3ICT),
Anyansi-Archibong, C. (2016). Challenges in ethics education: A process and content analysis. In Leadership and Personnel Management: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1938-1954). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9789-3.ch094
Aslami, M., & Ojaghi, N. (2022). Identifying the Competency Components of Instructors in E-learning Environment Based on a Constructivist Approach. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 28(4), 143-169.
Avci, E. (2017). Learning from experiences to determine quality in ethics education. International Journal of Ethics Education, 2, 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40889-016-0027-6
Azimpour, A., Rasti, A., Soureshjani, F. H., Sheibani, M., Nikfetrat, Y., Nazarizadeh, R., & Karimpour, Z. (2024). A generational study in Iranian university students' moral changes in the post-COVID atmosphere. Discover Psychology, 4(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00036-5
Biem, R., & Morrison, D. (2023). Collaboration and Ethics in Distance Learning Design. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 24(4), 194-213. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i4.7267
Boozaripour, M., Abbaszadeh, A., Shahriari, M., & Borhani, F. (2018). Ethical values in nurse education perceived by students and educators. Nursing Ethics, 25(2), 253-263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733017707009
Boud, D., & Bearman, M. (2024). The assessment challenge of social and collaborative learning in higher education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 56(5), 459-468. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2114346
Caballé, S., Juan, A. A., & Xhafa, F. (2008). Supporting effective monitoring and knowledge building in online collaborative learning systems. In Emerging Technologies and Information Systems for the Knowledge Society: First World Summit on the Knowledge Society, WSKS 2008 (pp. 205-214). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89927-1_29
Camacho-Morles, J., Slemp, G. R., Oades, L. G., Pekrun, R., & Morrish, L. (2019). Relative incidence and origins of achievement emotions in computer-based collaborative problem-solving: A control-value approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.035
Cannistraci, P., Kehm, B., Pieper, B. B., Speerschneider, K., Farber, S. L., & Storandt, B. C. (2018). Difficult to doable: Interprofessional collaborative practice in distance education. Journal of Nursing Education, 57(4), 225-228. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20180320-03
Chen, J., Wang, M., Kirschner, P. A., & Tsai, C. C. (2018). The role of collaboration, computer use, learning environments, and supporting strategies in CSCL: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 88(6), 799-843. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318791584
Chouinard, J. A., & Cousins, J. B. (2021). Developing an ethical rationale for collaborative approaches to evaluation. Evaluation, 27(3), 364-381. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389020925895
Cimino, R., Pascal, J., Chadha, A., Girgis, K., Khan, A., & Ortiz, M. (2022). Talk (engineering) ethics to me: Student group discussions about ethical scenarios. ASEE Annual Conference proceedings,
Dahlin-Ivanoff, S., Berge, I., & Barenfeld, E. (2024). Research collaboration with older people as a matter of scientific quality and ethics: A focus group study with researchers in ageing and health. Research Involvement and Engagement, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-024-00540-y
Davis, K., Tan, L., Miller, J., & Israel, M. (2022). Seeking approval: International higher education students' experiences of applying for human research ethics clearance in Australia. Journal of Academic Ethics, 20(1), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09415-1
De Hei, M. S. A., Strijbos, J. W., Sjoer, E., & Admiraal, W. (2015). Collaborative learning in higher education: Lecturers' practices and beliefs. Research Papers in Education, 30(2), 232-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2014.908407
Dinu, V., Câmpian, V., Vasiliu, C., Tăchiciu, L., & Dabija, D. C. (2022). Ethics and integrity in the context of economic research within doctoral schools. Amfiteatru Econ, 24, 912-933. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2022/S6/912
Erbil, D. G. (2020). A review of flipped classroom and cooperative learning methods within the context of Vygotsky theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1157. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01157
Fleischmann, K. R., Robbins, R. W., & Wallace, W. A. (2011). Collaborative learning of ethical decision-making via simulated cases. Proceedings of the 2011 iConference,
Genlott, A. A., & Grönlund, Å. (2016). Closing the gaps: Improving literacy and mathematics by ICT-enhanced collaboration. Computers & Education, 99, 68-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.04.004
Gillies, R. M. (2023). Promoting cognitive and affective dispositions through collaborative learning. In The Routledge International Handbook of Gender Beliefs, Stereotype Threat, and Teacher Expectations (pp. 307-317). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003172758-25
Holmes, J. (2012). Education futures: University grads don't make the grade. Woods Bagot.
Howland, S. J., Claussen, S., Jesiek, B. K., & Zoltowski, C. B. (2022). Influences on US undergraduate engineering students' perceptions of ethics and social responsibility: Findings from a longitudinal study. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 27(2), 88-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2022.2110810
Huang, M., Ouyang, Y., Huang, Q., & Xu, G. (2025). Understanding Moral Courage from Nurse Leaders' Perspectives: A Qualitative Exploration. Journal of Nursing Management, 2025(1), 6468962. https://doi.org/10.1155/jonm/6468962
Ignacio, J., Chen, H. C., & Roy, T. (2022). Advantages and challenges of fostering cognitive integration through virtual collaborative learning: A qualitative study. BMC Nursing, 21(1), 251. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00890-4
Jafari, E., & Alamolhoda, J. (2023). Lived experience of faculty members of ethics in virtual education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28(1), 387-405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09681-2
Juneja, K. K. (2021). Innovative pedagogy with computer-supported collaborative learning in teaching English language. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 9(3), 551-556. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2103551J
Kanchana, S., & Cherukuri, J. (2024). Augmenting teaching-learning process through discussion forum and Padlet. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2024/v38i1/15562
Keramati, A., Keramati, M. R., & Arefian, M. H. (2024). Students' reflection on the effect of collaborative learning on the learning environment and academic achievement in online reflective platforms. Reflective Practice, 25(2), 117-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2024.2305868
Keramati, M. R., & Gillies, R. (2022). Perceptions of nursing students on the effect of cooperative learning on academic achievement and learning environment. Nurse Education Today, 115, 2043388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2043388
Krasnof, B. (2016). Culturally responsive teaching: A guide to evidenced-based practices for teaching all students equitably. Equity Assistance Center at Education Northwest.
Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.098
LaChance, A. M., Pascal, J., Gan, D., Welsh, J. J. P., Pauly, T. J., & Paul, P. (2021). Teaching environmental justice principles to chemical engineering seniors: An antiracist, collaborative approach. 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access,
Lipponen, L. (2023). Exploring foundations for computer-supported collaborative learning. In Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 72-81). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003195888-14
LoPresto, M. C. (2020). Collaborative learning and formative assessment in astronomy. In Active Learning in College Science: The Case for Evidence-Based Practice (pp. 791-801). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01953-6_45
Luchini, K., Quintana, C., Curtis, M., Murphy, R., Krajcik, J., Soloway, E., & Suthers, D. (2023). Using handhelds to support collaborative learning. In Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 704-705). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003195888-98
Lunshof, J. E., & Rijssenbeek, J. (2024). Collaborative ethics: innovating collaboration between ethicists and life scientists. Nature Methods, 21(9), 1571-1574. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-024-02320-8
Mickel, A., Heidebrink-Bruno, A., Hosseiny Marani, A., Barone, I., Lee, O., & Baumer, E. P. (2023). The cultural production of everyday ethics in two university STEM labs. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 43(1-2), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/02704676221135690
Mkumbwa, R. D., Pancras, G., & Sirili, N. S. (2025). Going paperless: the strengths and limitations of electronic research ethics information management system in a health training institution in Tanzania. BMC Health Services Research, 25(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-12151-0
Mohammadi, M., Youzbashi, A., & Eskandar, F. (2023). The role of teaching ethics in student intentions and brand value. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 27(2), 199-227.
Murray, J. W. (2017). I hate/don't hate/still hate group projects! A tripartite ethical framework for enhancing student collaboration. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1377507. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1377507
Niu, Y., Dong, Y., Zhang, J., Zhang, S., & Cao, Y. (2025). The value of athletics class with the use of virtual reality games for better communication and socialization of students. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 693-714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13206-9
Nurdiana, R., Effendi, M. N., Ningsih, K. P., Abda, M. I., & Aslan, A. (2023). Collaborative partnerships for digital education to improve students' learning achievement at the Institute of Islamic Religion of Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas, Indonesia. International Journal of Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.12034/ijtl.v1i1.1234
Peramunugamage, A., Ratnayake, U. W., & Karunanayaka, S. P. (2023). Systematic review on mobile collaborative learning for engineering education. Journal of Computers in Education, 10(1), 83-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-022-00182-x
Pischetola, M., Møller, J. K., & Malmborg, L. (2023). Enhancing teacher collaboration in higher education: The potential of activity-oriented design for professional development. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 7571-7600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11490-x
Porkodi, S., Saranya, R., Sultana, A., & Mittal, P. (2023). Assessing the impact of collaborative learning practices on competency development in entrepreneurship program: A study of higher education students in Delhi NCR region of India. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 22(5), 2350021. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649223500214
Puntambekar, S. (2013). Mixed methods for analyzing collaborative learning. In The International Handbook of Collaborative Learning (pp. 220-230). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203846772-18
Queiruga Dios, M., Bullón Pérez, J. J., Queiruga-Dios, A., Hernández Encinas, A., & González Arrieta, A. (2018). Analysis of professional ethics in engineering undergraduate degrees. International Joint Conference SOCO'17-CISIS'17-ICEUTE'17,
Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2023). Factors affecting students' learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2371-2391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886
Rajiah, K. (2018). Technology enhanced collaborative learning in small group teaching sessions using Padlet application - A pilot study. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, 11(9), 4143-4146. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00765.3
Ren, X. (2023). Investigating the experiences of online instructors while engaging and empowering non-traditional learners in eCampus. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 237-253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11153-x
Rick, J., Guzdial, M., Holloway-Attaway, K. C. L., & Walker, B. (2023). Collaborative learning at low cost: CoWeb use in English composition. In Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 435-442). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003195888-84
Rivera, V. A., & Su, N. M. (2024). Teaching Ethics & Activism in a Human-Computer Interaction Professional Master's Program. Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education,
Shorten, A., Walma, D. A. C., Bosworth, P., Shorten, B., Chang, B., Moore, M. D., & Watts, P. I. (2023). Development and implementation of a virtual 'collaboratory' to foster interprofessional team-based learning using a novel faculty-student partnership. Journal of Professional Nursing, 46, 155-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.03.007
Simonette, M., Queiroz, V., & Spina, E. (2023). Ethics in collaborative educational environments: A reflection paper. EDULEARN23 Proceedings,
Sprague, A. P., & Diaz-Sprague, R. (2019). Tying ethics to teamwork training in a minimodule. Proceedings of the 8th Computer Science Education Research Conference,
Stockleben, B., Thayne, M., Jäminki, S., Haukijärvi, I., Mavengere, N. B., Demirbilek, M., & Ruohonen, M. (2017). Towards a framework for creative online collaboration: A research on challenges and context. Education and Information Technologies, 22, 575-597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9483-z
Streiner, S. C., Burkey, D. D., Young, M. F., Cimino, R. T., & Pascal, J. (2021). Engineering ethics through high-impact collaborative/competitive scenarios (e-ethiccs).
Sutherland, K., Brock, G., de Villiers Scheepers, M. J., Millear, P. M., Norman, S., Strohfeldt, T., & Black, A. L. (2023). Non-traditional students' preferences for learning technologies and impacts on academic self-efficacy. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 35, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09354-5
Tammeleht, A., Koort, K., Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., & Löfström, E. (2022). Knowledge-building process during collaborative research ethics training for researchers: Experiences from one university. International Journal of Ethics Education, 7(1), 147-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-022-00142-2
Tang, B. L., & Lee, J. S. C. (2020). A reflective account of a research ethics course for an interdisciplinary cohort of graduate students. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(2), 1089-1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00149-4
Tran, M., & Fiesler, C. (2024). 'It's not exactly meant to be realistic': Student perspectives on the role of ethics in computing group projects. Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research,
Tshuma, L. S., & Chasokela, D. (2025). The Rise of Online Learning and the Technological Revolution in Higher Education. In Insights into International Higher Education Leadership and the Skills Gap (pp. 447-470). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3443-0.ch017
VanDeGrift, T., Dillon, H., & Camp, L. (2017). Changing the engineering student culture with respect to academic integrity and ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23, 1159-1182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9859-0
Vijayalakshmi, D., & Kanchana, J. (2020). Evaluating the effectiveness of collaborative learning in fashion studies. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 991-1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.143
Virgili, E. T. (2013). Online collaborative learning and ethics of care. Estudios sobre Educación, 24(24), 149-171. https://doi.org/10.15581/004.24.149-171
Vojdani, F., & Karamī Qahī, M. T. (2022). Female students' experience and understanding of the problems with virtual teaching in the quarantine period from a moral viewpoint. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 15(55), 71-98.
Wang, M., Jiang, L., & Luo, H. (2023). Dyads or quads? Impact of group size and learning context on collaborative learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1168208. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1168208
Yang, X. (2023). A historical review of collaborative learning and cooperative learning. TechTrends, 67, 718-728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00823-9
Yeom, H. A., Ahn, S. H., & Kim, S. J. (2017). Effects of ethics education on moral sensitivity of nursing students. Nursing Ethics, 24(6), 644-652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733015584791
Zabar, S., Adams, J., Kurland, S., Shaker-Brown, A., Porter, B., Horlick, M., & Gillespie, C. (2016). Charting a key competency domain: Understanding resident physician interprofessional collaboration (IPC) skills. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 31, 846-853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-016-3671-8
Zhang, Q., Peck, K. L., Hristova, A., Jablokow, K. W., Hoffman, V., Park, E., & Bayeck, R. Y. (2016). Exploring the communication preferences of MOOC learners and the value of preference-based groups: Is grouping enough? Educational Technology Research and Development, 64, 809-837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9442-0
Zhou, X., & Tsai, C. W. (2023). The effects of socially shared regulation of learning on the computational thinking, motivation, and engagement in collaborative learning by teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 8135-8152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11310-7
Živojinović, L., Stojanović, D., Labus, A., Bogdanović, Z., & Despotović-Zrakić, M. (2023). Harnessing Instagram® for collaborative learning in higher education. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2236487
 

  • تاریخ دریافت 21 اردیبهشت 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 21 آبان 1404
  • تاریخ انتشار 10 تیر 1405