مینیمالیسم و دلالت‌های آن در برنامه درسی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری برنامه ریزی درسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه بیرجند، بیرجند، ایران.
2 دانشیار گروه علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه بیرجند، بیرجند، ایران.
10.61838/KMAN.IRPHE.32.2.7
چکیده
مینیمالیسم یا ساده‌گرایی مفهومی چندوجهی است که بسته به زمینه‌، تعاریف و کاربردهای متنوعی دارد. هدف پژوهش، واکاوی دلالت‌های نظری مینیمالیسم در طراحی عناصر برنامۀ درسی آموزش عالی است. این مطالعه کیفی و مبتنی بر رویکرد جستار نظرورزانه بود؛ رویکردی که امکان تحلیل مفهومی و تلفیق خلاقانۀ مبانی نظری را با تبیین انتقادی فراهم می‌آورد. داده‌ها با استفاده از روش «بررسی مستندات» گردآوری شد و شامل منابعی در حوزه‌های فلسفه، زیبایی‌شناسی، روانشناسی و جامعه‌شناسی مرتبط با مینیمالیسم بود. سپس مفاهیم استخراج‌شده در پیوند با عناصر برنامۀ درسی بررسی شدند. نتایج نشان داد که از منظر مینیمالیستی، اهداف آموزشی باید به‌جای کلی‌گویی‌های متداول، گزینش‌شده، هدفمند و معنادار باشند. محتوای درسی نیازمند بازچینش و حذف اطلاعات زاید است، به‌گونه‌ای که پیوستار مفهومی یادگیری تقویت شود. روش‌های تدریس نیز باید با طراحی فعالیت‌هایی برای یادگیری مستقل، در عین اجتناب از بار شناختی اضافه، هماهنگ باشند. درنهایت، در بخش ارزشیابی، تمرکز باید از سنجش‌های صرفاً کمّی به ارزیابی‌های کیفی و معنادار همچون نمونه‌کار، خودسنجی و روایت یادگیرنده منتقل شود. مینیمالیسم می‌تواند به‌مثابه چارچوبی نظری و انتقادی، در بهبود کیفیت، افزایش معنا و تقویت وضوح در برنامه‌ریزی درسی مؤثر واقع شود. با این حال، اجرای مؤثر آن در بافت آموزش عالی ایران مستلزم مواجهه با چالش‌هایی همچون مقاومت نهادی، ساختارهای ارزشیابی سنتی و نگرش‌های کمّی‌محور است. این رویکرد می‌تواند به مقابله با گسترش بی‌رویه محتوا و روش‌های غیرضروری در آموزش کمک و فضای یادگیری را به محیطی معنادار و یادگیرنده - محور تبدیل کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Minimalism and Its Implications in the Curriculum

نویسندگان English

Hassan Zabet 1
Mohsen Ayati 2
1 PhD student in Curriculum Planning, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran.,
چکیده English

Minimalism is a multifaceted concept whose definitions and applications vary depending on context. The aim of this study is to examine the theoretical implications of minimalism for designing curriculum components in higher education. This research adopts a qualitative approach grounded in the speculative essay methodology—a strategy that enables conceptual analysis and creative synthesis of theoretical foundations through critical reflection. Data were collected through the “documentary review” method, drawing upon sources in philosophy, aesthetics, psychology, and sociology related to minimalism. The extracted concepts were then analyzed in connection with curriculum elements. The results indicate that, from a minimalist perspective, educational objectives should be selected, purposeful, and meaningful rather than vague and conventional. Curriculum content requires restructuring and the elimination of redundant information to enhance the conceptual continuity of learning. Teaching methods should align with the design of activities that foster independent learning while avoiding extraneous cognitive load. Finally, assessment practices should shift from purely quantitative testing toward meaningful and qualitative evaluations such as portfolios, self-assessment, and learner narratives. Minimalism can serve as a critical and theoretical framework for improving quality, enhancing meaning, and increasing clarity in curriculum planning. However, its effective implementation within Iran’s higher education system requires confronting challenges such as institutional resistance, traditional evaluation structures, and dominant quantitative mindsets. This approach may help counteract the excessive expansion of content and unnecessary teaching practices, transforming the learning environment into a meaningful and learner-centered space.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Minimalism
higher education
curriculum
conceptual design
meaningful assessment
speculative essay
Abbaszadeh, M. (2012). Reflection on reliability and validity in qualitative research. Journal of Applied Sociology, 23(1), 19-34.
Agahi, S., & Salwén, H. (2025). A Protocol for Minimalist Curriculum Mapping. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 13, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.13.33
Azizi Alavijeh, A., Emamjomeh, M., Mehrmohammadi, M., Assareh, A., & Ahmadi, G. (2023). From the Mushfake identity to the enrichment of the student teacher identity. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 29(4), 103-122. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.irphe.29.4.6
Baudrillard, J. (2016). The consumer society: Myths and structures. https://www.torrossa.com/gs/resourceProxy?an=5018669&publisher=FZ7200
Baule, S. M., Beasley, L., Bergerson, H., Bojic, D. L., Carter, E., Danneman, J., Dufault, C., Flugum, M., Gunnink, S. R., & Hansen, M. L. M. (2024). How is Technology Shaping the Future of Study? https://openriver.winona.edu/educationeddbooks/4/
Botha, M. (2017). A theory of minimalism. Bloomsbury Publishing. Botha, M. (2017). A theory of minimalism, Bloomsbury Publishing.
Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007). Rethinking assessment in higher education. Routledge London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203964309
Carraher Wolverton, C., & Guidry Hollier, B. N. (2019). A minimalist design for distance learning. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(7), 1457-1465. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-09-2017-0237
Carroll, J. M. (1990). An overview of minimalist instruction. Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences,
Carroll, J. M. (1998). Minimalism Beyond the Nurnberg Funnel. Interactions-New York, 5(4), 35. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4616.001.0001
Farasatkhah, M., Ghazi, M., & Bazargan, A. (2008). Quality Challenge in Iran's Higher Education: A Historical Review. Iranian Studies, 41(2), 115-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/00210860801913321
Fraser, S. P., & Bosanquet, A. M. (2006). The curriculum? That's just a unit outline, isn't it? Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 269-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600680521
Gabriele, A. (2007). A minimalist approach to improving performance in modern American schools. Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the ISSS-2007, Tokyo, Japan.
Ghafouri, M., & Hassaskhah, J. (2024). A qualitative inquiry of minimalistic mindset outcomes on Iranian English language teachers' well-being. Discover Psychology, 4(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44202-024-00142-5
Gilbert, C. (2024). An Appraisal of Minimalism in Education and Impacts on Language Pedagogy. FUO-Journal of Educational Research, 3(1). https://foej.fuotuoke.edu.ng/index.php/foej/article/download/17/26
Greaney, P. (2016). An Introduction to literary minimalism in the American short story. Philgreaney Wordpress, 30-33.
Hosseini Largani, M., & Charbashlou, H. (2022). Curriculum Design and Development in Selected Universities: criteria extraction for designing an optimal university curriculum model. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 28(3), 143-172. https://doi.org/10.52547/irphe.28.3.143
Ismail, A. M. A. (2025). Minimalist Design Concepts as a Holistic Educational Approach in Sustainable Packaging Design Methodology. Journal of Design Sciences and Applied Arts, 6(1), 38-47. https://doi.org/10.21608/jdsaa.2024.244932.1386
Kamali, H., Yamani Duozi Sorkhabi, M., & Arefi, M. (2023). An analysis of understanding curriculum in higher education studies in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 27(3), 143-175. https://journal.irphe.ac.ir/article_703037.html
Kant, I. (2000). Critique of the Power of Judgment. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804656
Khan, M. A., & Law, L. S. (2015). An Integrative Approach to Curriculum Development in Higher Education in the USA: A Theoretical Framework. International Education Studies, 8(3), 66-76. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n3p66
Khosravi, R., & Ghasemi, N. (2024). A speculative essay on pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) in primary education. The 4th National Conference on Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK), Zanjan, Iran.
Lloyd, K., & Pennington, W. (2020). Towards a Theory of Minimalism and Wellbeing. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 5(3), 121-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-020-00030-y
Mahmoodi booreng, M., & Ayati, M. (2020). Explaining the psychological foundations of Flow theory in curriculum elements. Educational Psychology, 16(57), 265-282. https://doi.org/10.22054/jep.2021.50138.2914
Marandi Heydarloo, M., Adib, Y., Fathi Azar, A., & Mahmoodi, F. (2018). Service learning: Applying educational theory to practice. Curriculum Studies, 15(59), 1-17.
Marcuse, H. (2013). One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203995211
Masboogh, S., & Delshad, S. (2015). Minimalism features in a narrative of Nahj al-Balaghah. Nahj Al-Balaghah Research Quarterly, 3(11), 55. https://nab.basu.ac.ir/article_1287.html
Mehrmohammadi, M. (2013). Speculative essays in education. Tarbiat Modares University Press.
Mehrmohammadi, M. (2017). Speculative essay: A genre of philosophical research in education. Iranian Curriculum Studies Quarterly, 12(4), 7-24.
Meloni, P. (2023). The Roots of Minimalism: How Simple Living Became a Movement. Medium.
Mulder, M. (2017). Competence theory and research: A synthesis. In Competence-Based Vocational and Professional Education: Bridging the Worlds of Work and Education (pp. 1071-1106). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41713-4_50
Nguna, S. (2020). Exploring the Application of Carroll's Minimalist Theory in Effective Instructional Design for Online Learning in Higher Education https://www.academia.edu/47433286/Exploring_the_Application_of_Carrolls_Minimalist_Theory_in_Effective_Instructional_Design_for_Online_Learning_in_Higher_Education
Obendorf, H. (2009). Minimalism: designing simplicity. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-371-6
Ramezani Sadr, A., Salehi, K., Moghaddamzadeh, A., Khodaee, E., & Javadipour, M. (2024). Classroom Assessment Quality Criteria in Universities Based on Three Assessment Approaches. Ihej, 16(2), 91-115. http://ihej.ir/article-1-2042-fa.html
Sasaki, F. (2021). On minimalist living: Goodbye to excess belongings. Qoqnoos Publishing.
Selvakumar, P., Sameer, B. M., Portia, R., Das, A., & Pachar, S. (2025). Curricula Design and Accreditation. In Instructional Approaches for Health Professions Education (pp. 431-458). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-4334-0.ch015
Selwyn, N. (2021). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/education-and-technology-9781350145566/
Strickland, E. (2000). Minimalism: Origins. Indiana University Press. https://doi.org/10.2979/3496.0
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Altering Element Interactivity and Intrinsic Cognitive load. In Cognitive Load Theory (pp. 203-218). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4_16
Tyler, R. W. (2013). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. In Curriculum studies reader E2 (pp. 60-68). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226086644.001.0001
Van der Meij, H. (1995). Principles and heuristics for designing minimalist instruction. Technical Communication, 42(2), 243-261. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/stc/tc/1995/00000042/00000002/art00007
 

  • تاریخ دریافت 10 اردیبهشت 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 17 شهریور 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 04 مهر 1404
  • تاریخ انتشار 10 تیر 1405