چالش‌ها و فرصت‌های نهادهای واسط در تحقق دانشگاه کارآفرین: مطالعه موردی چندگانه

نویسندگان
سیدساجد سیدموسوی 1
محمود ابوالقاسمی 2
محمد قهرمانی 2
محمدصادق خیاطیان یزدی 3
1 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
2 دانشیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
3 استادیار پژوهشکده مطالعات بنیادین علم و فناوری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
10.61838/KMAN.IRPHE.31.4.6
چکیده
تحقق دانشگاه کارآفرین موضوع پژوهش ­های بسیاری بوده و همواره تحقق دانشگاه­ های نسل جدید در سیر تطور نسل­ های پی­ در پی دانشگاهی از اهداف و آرزوهای سیاستگذاران و پژوهشگران بوده ­است. در این میان، نقش نهادهای واسط در تحقق دانشگاه کارآفرین کمتر بررسی شده است. نقش نهادهای واسط با چالش­ ها و امکان­ های مهمی روبه روست و انجام دادن مطالعات اکتشافی حول احصای این چالش ­ها ضروری به نظر می­ رسد. این پژوهش با رویکرد کیفی و به روش مطالعه موردی چندگانه انجام شد. پنج نهاد واسط مرتبط با دانشگاه ­های برتر کشور برای مطالعه عمیق ­تر انتخاب و از طریق مصاحبه­ های آزاد و نیمه ­ساختاریافته و مطالعه اسناد، داده ­های لازم از مسئولان و کارشناسان این نهاد جمع ­آوری و به روش تحلیل محتوا تحلیل شدند. یافته­ های پژوهش در قالب شش دسته چالش و فرصت شامل مسائل راهبردی، تأمین مالی، منابع انسانی، حقوقی، مدیریت دانش و محیطی احصا و جمع ­بندی شدند. از مهم ­ترین چالش ­های نهادهای واسط در کشور، تأمین نشدن منابع مالی به ­صورت پایدار، نبود شخصیت حقوقی متناسب با ویژگی­ ها و اقتضائات نهادهای واسط در کشور، اتخاذ راهبردهای غیرواقع­ بینانه، بروز تنش و اختلاف هنگام توزیع سهام بین اعضای تیم و سرمایه ­گذار و نهاد واسط و بی­ توجهی به مدیریت دانش است. از سوی دیگر، فرصت نهادهای واسط در ارتباط سرمایه ­انسانی دانشگاه ­ها، قرابت فیزیکی و ساختاری به دانشگاه­ ها، استفاده از فضای استقرار در داخل دانشگاه و کیفیت بالای سرمایه­ انسانی نهادهای واسط، از جمله فرصت­ های این نهادها در تحقق دانشگاه کارآفرین است. پیشنهادهای پژوهش برای ارتقای عملکرد نهادهای واسط عبارت است از: تعریف شخصیت حقوقی متناسب، پیشبرد عملیاتی راهبردهای اتخاذشده به موازات برگزاری جلسات برنامه­ ریزی و تعیین استراتژی، ایجاد امکان استفاده از فضای استقرار در داخل دانشگاه، کاستن از بروکراسی فرایند همکاری با دانشگاه در جذب پروژه و انعقاد تفاهمنامه بین نهاد واسط و تیم کارآفرین در آغاز همکاری در قالب قرارداد مکتوب، صریح و جزئی.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Mediating for the Transformation of the University: Identifying Challenges and Opportunities

نویسندگان English

seyed sajed seyed mousavi 1
Mahmood Abolghasemi 2
Mohammad Ghahramani 2
Mohammad Sadegh Khayatian Yazdi 3
1 PhD student at Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Institute for Fundamental Studies of Science and Technology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

The realization of entrepreneurial university has been the subject of many researches and the realization of new generation universities has always been the goal and aspirations of policymakers and researchers. Meanwhile, the role of intermediary institutions in the realization of the third generation university has been less investigated. However, the role of intermediary institutions faces important challenges and possibilities that must be given serious attention, and the need to conduct exploratory studies around these challenges seems essential. This article is done with a qualitative approach and multiple case study method. In this research, five intermediate institutions related to the top universities of the country were selected for deeper study and through free and semi-structured interviews and document study, the necessary data were collected from the officials and experts of this institution And it was analyzed by the "content analysis" method. Failure to provide stable financial resources, lack of legal personality in accordance with the characteristics and requirements of intermediary institutions in the country, adoption of unrealistic strategies, occurrence of tension and quarrel in the times of distribution of shares between team members and investors and intermediary institutions, lack of attention to knowledge management are the most important challenges of intermediary institutions in the country.The opportunities of intermediary institutions in relation to the human capital of universities, physical and structural proximity to universities, the use of the establishment space inside the university and the high quality of human capital of intermediary institutions, are opportunities of these institutions for realization of the third generation university. With regard to the mentioned issues, suggestions have been made to improve the performance of intermediary institutions, including "definition of appropriate legal personality", "operational advancement of adopted strategies in parallel with holding planning meetings and determining strategy". Making it possible to use the establishment space inside the university", "reducing the bureaucracy of the process of cooperation with the university in attracting projects" and “Establishing an understanding between the intermediary and the entrepreneur team at the beginning of cooperation in the form of a written, explicit and detailed contract” mentioned.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Intermediary entity
Third generation university
Entrepreneur University
Multiple case study
Qualitative method

References

Aghajari, R., & Varij Kazemi, A. (2023). Market-oriented approaches to higher education in the 1390s. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 29(4), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.61838/KMAN.IRPHE.29.4.1
Akrami, Z. (2024). Designing and Validating the Model of Empowering Faculty Members to Encourage Students to Engage in Entrepreneurial Activities. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 30(1), 58-78. https://doi.org/10.61838/KMAN.IRPHE.30.1.4
Aliyyah, R. R., Rosyidi, U., & Rugaiyah, R. (2019). Higher Education Scholarship: Gate to Develop Educational Human Resource Quality. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 1(4), 349-358. https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v1i4.1501
Armstrong, K. E., Class, L., Leidinger, K. P., Martinelli, L., & Schulze, L. (2023). Overdependence in Silicon Valley on the Technology Industry. In The Strategic Management of Place at Work: Why, What, How and Where (pp. 343-356). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29463-1_18
Bagheri, S. F., Nazarian, R., Hadinejad, M., & Damankeshideh, M. (2022). The Impact of Macroeconomic, Financial, Economic and Economic Crisis Indicators on Trade Cycles of Iran and Selected Islamic and Developed Developing Countries. Financial Economics, 16(2), 303-323. https://srb.sanad.iau.ir/en/Article/1063267?FullText=FullText
Balarezo, J., & Nielsen, B. B. (2017). Scenario planning as organizational intervention: an integrative framework and future research directions. Review of International Business and Strategy, 27(1), 2-52. https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-09-2016-0049
Bessant, J., & Rush, H. (1995). Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer. Research Policy, 24(1), 97-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(93)00751-E
Blankesteijn, M., Bossink, B., & van der Sijde, P. (2021). Science-based entrepreneurship education as a means for university-industry technology transfer. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17(2), 779-808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00623-3
Bolboli, S. A., & Reiche, M. (2013). A model for sustainable business excellence: implementation and the roadmap. The TQM Journal, 25(4), 331-346. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542731311314845
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2009). 'Mode 3' and 'Quadruple Helix': toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3-4), 201-234. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
Cham Asemani, M., Farasatkhah, M., & Mirkamali, S. M. (2023). Presenting the Conceptual Model of Innovative University Based on the Meta-Synthesis Method (With Emphasis on Distinction of Entrepreneurship and Innovation). Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 29(3), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.61838/irphe.29.3.3
Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Pergamon.
Clark, B. R. (2003). Sustaining change in universities: Continuities in case studies and concepts. Tertiary Education and Management, 9(2), 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2003.9967096
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell.pdf
Danilwan, Y., & Dirhamsyah, I. P. (2022). The Impact of the Human Resource Practices on The Organizational Performance: Does Ethical Climate Matter? Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(3), 1-16. https://repository.uniga.ac.id/file/dosen/1958926854.pdf
Delavar, A. (2010). Qualitative methodology. Rahbord, 18(1).
Dill, D. D. (1995). University-industry entrepreneurship: the organization and management of American university technology transfer units. Higher Education, 29(4), 369-384. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383958
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
El-Masri, M., Orozco, J., Tarhini, A., & Tarhini, T. (2015). The impact of IS-business alignment practices on organizational choice of IS-business alignment strategies.
Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Research Policy, 27(8), 823-833. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00093-6
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix-University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge-Based Economic Development. EASST Review, 14(1), 14-19. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2480085
George, B., Walker, R. M., & Monster, J. (2019). Does strategic planning improve organizational performance? A metaanalysis. Public Administration Review, 79(6), 810-819. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13104
Ghahramani, M., Haji Kajeh Loo, S. R., & Abuchenari, A. (2012). The Role of Transformational Leadership in Promoting the University to an Entrepreneurial Organization: Case of Shahid Beheshti University. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 4(4), 185.
Hajibabaei, N., & Rezaei, A. (2022). Providing a Local Model for NGOs Empowerment. Development of Humanities, 2(4), 103-130. https://hsd.ias.ac.ir/article_182853_en.html
Huoponen, O. L. (2018). Barriers to startup establishment: Pre-Incubator and incubator program OAMK LABs. https://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/146501
Jakubik, M. (2020). Enhancing human capital beyond university boundaries. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 10(2), 434-446. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-06-2019-0074
Kanda, W., Hjelm, O., Clausen, J., & Bienkowska, D. (2018). Roles of intermediaries in supporting eco-innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205, 1006-1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.132
Kim, H., Batten, J. A., & Ryu, D. (2020). Financial crisis, bank diversification, and financial stability: OECD countries. International Review of Economics & Finance, 65, 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2019.08.009
McClure, K. R. (2016). Building the innovative and entrepreneurial university: An institutional case study of administrative academic capitalism. The Journal of Higher Education, 87(4), 516-543. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.11777412
McQuinn, K., O'Toole, C., Economides, P., & Monteiro, T. (2018). Quarterly Economic Commentary Summer 2018. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/197520/1/QEC20182.pdf
Mehdi, M., Hosseini Davarani, S. M., & Firouzabadi, M. (2018). Financing mechanisms of higher education, Case study universities in Germany. Journal of Financial Analysis, 3(2), 27-36. https://ijfa.ir/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/ijfa.ir-mahdi-mehdi.pdf
Meigounpoory, M. R., Arabiun, A., Poorbasir, M. M., & Mobini Dehkordi, A. (2019). Entrepreneurial University Campus Ecosystem (EUCE) Design with Interpretive Structural Modelling. Technology of Education Journal, 13(4), 969-980. https://jte.sru.ac.ir/article_980_en.html
Mills, A. J., Durepos, G., & Wiebe, E. (2009). Encyclopedia of Case Study Research. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412957397
Mohammadpour, S., Salarzehi, H., Kamalian, A. R., Yaghoubi, N. M., & Mehdi, M. (2021). Identification and analysis of the strategic drivers of entrepreneurial university using cross impact analysis approach. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 23(89), 133-156. https://search.proquest.com/openview/c6ee9bee43676ef6bb474e3d137e5c7c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2031971
Najah, N., Setiadi, D., & Fahruddin, F. (2022). Development of human resources management in increasing the quality of education reviewing from planning aspects. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 5(7), 82-88. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v5i7.334
Raeisoon, M., Abbaspour, A., Rahimian, H., Khorsani Taskoh, A., & Borzoian Shirvan, S. (2018). An exploration of the organizational structure components of universities of medical sciences in transition to third generation university. Journals of Birjand University of Medical Sciences, 25, 1-15. https://www.sid.ir/paper/95696/en
Ratten, V. (2017). Entrepreneurial universities: the role of communities, people and places. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 11(3), 310-315. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-03-2017-0021
Rostami Tangaki, A., Ostovar Sangri, K., & Zarrabi, H. (2024). The effect of scientific compilation and inflation of laws on legislative transparency. Economic Jurisprudence Studies, 6, 821-836. https://journal.ihrci.ir/article_204901_en.html
Shiri, N., Khoshmaram, M., & Mehdizadeh, H. (2024). Evaluating the Role of Entrepreneurship Education in the Development of Entrepreneurial Mindsets of Iranian Students. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 30(2), 16-33. https://doi.org/10.61838/KMAN.IRPHE.30.2.2
Sinambela, E. A., Darmawan, D., & Mendrika, V. (2022). Effectiveness of Efforts to Establish Quality Human Resources in the Organization. Journal of Marketing and Business Research (MARK), 2(1), 47-58. https://ejournal.metromedia.education/index.php/mark/article/view/43/0
Soleimani, M. (2012). Science and technology parks and incubators with a global perspective. Journal Roshd-e-Fanavari, 8(32), 2-10. https://www.sid.ir/paper/144945/en
Tyllström, A., & Murray, J. (2021). Lobbying the client: The role of policy intermediaries in corporate political activity. Organization Studies, 42(6), 971-991. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619866486
Willig, C., & Rogers, W. S. (2017). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526405555
Wissema, J. G. (2009). Towards the third generation university: managing the university in transition. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848446182
Yasari, M., Hosseini Dronkolaei, S. Z., & Taheri, F. (2023). Identifying the dimensions of university incubators in third generation universities. Journal of Executive Management, 14(28), 483-512. https://jem.journals.umz.ac.ir/m/article_4065_e09aa71a27dac717ef9401f88cb70488.pdf
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Vol. 5). Sage. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=FzawIAdilHkC&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=Yin,+R.+K.+(2009).+Case+Study+Research:+Design+and+Methods,+Sage.+%09&ots=l-3T4ejV4u&sig=H7w4VeMZ7bk6_wI3GfrQ3a_6mKg
Ziyae, B., Rezvani, M., Mobaraki, M. H., & Tajpour, M. (2019). Internationalization pattern of University with an Entrepreneurial Approach (case study: Iranian Universities). Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 12(2), 301-320. https://jed.ut.ac.ir/article_73477_en.html
Zouaoui, H., & Zoghlami, F. (2023). What do we know about the impact of income diversification on bank performance? A systematic literature review. Journal of Banking Regulation, 24(3), 286-309. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-022-00201-8
 

  • تاریخ دریافت 07 مهر 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 22 اسفند 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 07 خرداد 1404
  • تاریخ انتشار 10 آذر 1404