الگوی شایستگی رؤسای دانشکده ها با تأکید بر حکمرانی دانشگاهی

نویسندگان
محمد جمشید خزایی 1
علی خورسندی طاسکوه 2
صمد برزوبان 3
عنایت اله زمانپور 4
حسین عبدالهی 3
1 دانشجوی دکتری رشته مدیریت آموزش عالی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران
2 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت و برنامه ریزی آموزشی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران
3 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت و برنامه ریزی آموزشی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی تهران،ایران
4 استادیار، گروه سنجش و اندازه گیری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.
10.61838/KMAN.IRPHE.31.3.4
چکیده
این پژوهش با هدف طراحی الگوی شایستگی روسای دانشکده‌ها بر مبنای حکمرانی دانشگاهی انجام شد. با استفاده از رویکرد پژوهش اکتشافی، مؤلفه‌ها و زیرمولفه‌‌‌های الگو بر اساس دریافت نظر صاحب‌نظران و خبرگان آموزش عالی شناسایی گردید. روش این پژوهش از حیث گردآوری داده، کیفی، از حیث هدف، اکتشافی و ازنظر نتیجه، توسعه‌ای است. برای گردآوری داده و اطلاعات در بخش کیفی از استراتژی داده بنیاد و ابزار مصاحبه نیمه ساختارمند استفاده شد. مشارکت‌کنندگان بخش میدانی پژوهش رؤسای دانشکده‌ها در دانشگاه‌های کشور و صاحب‌نظران آموزش عالی کشور بودند. با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند و گلوله برفی و با معیار اشباع نظری با دوازده مشارکت‌کننده مصاحبه انجام شد. تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده و اطلاعات در بخش کیفی از طریق کدگذاری سه مرحله‌ای «باز»، «محوری» و «گزینشی» با استفاده از رهیافت نظام‌مند اشتراوس و کوربین (1997) برای نظریه‌پردازی استفاده شده است. بـا مطالعه داده‌ها و اطلاعـات استخراج‌شده درنهایت، 487 کدباز (مفهوم اولیه)، 292 مفهوم و 31 مقوله شنـاسـایی شدنـد که این مقوله‌ها و مفاهیم به‌صورت شماتیک در قالب شش بعد اصلی طراحی گردید. یافته‌های این پژوهش نشان داد، با توجه به ساختار سیاست‌گذاری متمرکز آموزش عالی در ایران، حکمرانی علمی دانشکده‌ها با موقعیت خاص متناسب با عدم استقلال سازمانی مواجه است. درنتیجه، برای تسهیل حکمرانی علمی دانشکده‌ها، مسئولیت سپاری به روسای دانشکده‌ها با ابتنا بر شایستگی‌های استخراج‌شده این پژوهش از قبیل «مهارت خط‌مشی گذاری»، «مهارت سیاسی»، «ارتقا شاخص‌های کیفی آموزش»، «مهارت‌های نرم»، «تفکر سیستمی»، «مسئولیت‌پذیری و پاسخگویی»، «آگاهی از حکمرانی جهانی»، «مهارت تصمیم‌گیری»، «تعامل با ذی‌نفعان»، «حاکمیت اخلاقی»، «دانش و تخصص آکادمیک»، «تعهد به ارزش‌های دانشگاهی» ضروری است.
کلیدواژه‌ها: الگوی شایستگی، حکمرانی علمی، حکمرانی دانشگاهی، مهارت‌های نرم، تعامل با ذی‌نفعان، روسای دانشکده‌ها

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The competency pattern of faculty deans with emphasis on Academic governance

نویسندگان English

Jamshid Khazaei 1
Ali Khorsandi Taskoh 2
Samad Borzoyan 3
Enayatollah Zamanpour 4
Hosein Abdolahi 3
1 PhD student in Higher Education Management, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Management and Planning, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Management and Planning, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Measurement and Measurement, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

This study was conducted with the aim of designing a competency model for faculty deans based on academic governance. Using an exploratory research approach, the components and subcomponents of the model were identified based on the opinions of higher education experts and scholars. The method of this study is qualitative in terms of data collection, exploratory in terms of purpose, and developmental in terms of results. A data-driven strategy and semi-structured interview tool were used to collect data and information in the qualitative section. The participants in the field study were faculty deans in specialized universities and higher education experts in the country. Twelve participants were interviewed using purposive and snowball sampling methods and with a theoretical saturation criterion. Data and information analysis in the qualitative section was conducted through three-stage coding: "open", "axial", and "selective" using the systematic approach of Strauss and Corbin (1997) for theory building. By studying the extracted data and information, 462 open codes (initial concepts), 267 concepts, and 30 categories were identified, and these categories and concepts were schematically designed in the form of six main dimensions. The findings of this study showed that, given the centralized policy-making structure of higher education in Iran and the lack of organizational independence of specialized universities, the scientific governance of faculties faces a special situation. As a result, to facilitate the scientific governance of faculties, it is necessary to assign responsibility to faculty deans based on the competencies extracted from this study, such as "policy-making skills", "political skills", "improving educational quality indicators", "soft skills", "system thinking", "responsibility and accountability", "awareness of global governance", "decision-making skills", "interaction with stakeholders", "ethical governance", "academic knowledge and expertise", and "commitment to academic values".

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Competency model
academic governance
university governance
soft skills
stakeholder engagement
faculty deans
Abrantes, R., & Figueiredo, J. (2021). Information systems and change in project based organizations. Procedia Computer Science, 181, 367-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.184
Afkhami Rohani, H., Rahmanseresht, H., & Marjani, S. (2015). University Governance and Evaluation of Websites and Portals. Higher Education Letter, 7(28), 75-96. https://journal.sanjesh.org/m/article_14841.html?lang=en
Amanda, Z., Clark, K. G., & Shapiro, A. (2024). Implementing Information Governance in Academic Libraries. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0472-3.ch010
Amiri Farahabadi, J., Abolghasmi, M., & Soleymani, S. (2018). The Study of the Convergence of University Governance and Quasi-Market Actions in Iran's Higher Education. Ihej, 10(4), 61-86. https://www.sid.ir/paper/135868/en
Apkarian, N., Henderson, C., Stains, M., Raker, J., Johnson, E., & Dancy, M. (2021). What really impacts the use of active learning in undergraduate STEM education? Results from a national survey of chemistry, mathematics, and physics instructors. PLoS One, 16(2), e0247544. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247544
Beck, U. (2000). World risk society as cosmopolitan society? Ecological questions in a framework of manufactured uncertainties. Theory, Culture & Society, 13(4), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276496013004001
Beierle, T. C., & Konisky, D. M. (2001). What are we gaining from stakeholder involvement? Observations from environmental planning in the Great Lakes. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 19(4), 515-527. https://doi.org/10.1068/c5s
Bordbar, G., & Shakeri, F. (2011). An Analytic Study on Competency Based Selection and Appointment of the Head of Departments in Yazd University. Research in Production and Operations Management, 2(2), 101-120. https://jpom.ui.ac.ir/article_19772_en.html
Broucker, B., De Wit, K., & Leisyte, L. (2015, 2015/08/26-2015/08/28). New public management or new public governance for the higher education sector? An international comparison. European Group of Public Administration,
Bulkeley, H., & Mol, A. P. (2003). Participation and environmental governance: consensus, ambivalence and debate. Environmental Values, 12(2), 143-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/096327190301200201
Carnegie, G. D., & Tuck, J. (2010). Understanding the ABC of university governance. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69(4), 431-441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2010.00699.x
Cavale, S., & Katarki, S. B. (1996). GATT and the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry-Meeting the Challenges. Student Advoc., 8, 63. https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/nlsind8§ion=12
Chilvers, J. (2008). Environmental risk, uncertainty, and participation: mapping an emergent epistemic community. Environment and Planning A, 40(12), 2990-3008. https://doi.org/10.1068/a39279
Chong, E. (2013). Managerial competencies and career advancement: A comparative study of managers in two countries. Journal of Business Research, 66(3), 345-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.08.015
Dadash Karimi, Y., Mirsepassi, N., & Najafbeigi, R. (2019). Designing a Model for the Higher Education Governance. Public Organizations Management, 7(3), 11-28. https://doi.org/10.30473/ipom.2019.44417.3478
Day, D. V., Riggio, R. E., Tan, S. J., & Conger, J. A. (2021). Advancing the science of 21st-century leadership development: Theory, research, and practice. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(5), 101557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101557
Felt, U., Wynne, B., Callon, M., Gonçalves, M. E., Jasanoff, S., Jepsen, M., & Tallacchini, M. (2007). Taking European knowledge society seriously: Report of the expert group on science and governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission. https://hal.science/hal-02823887/
Ghaffari, R. (2019). Manager's Competency, Axiomatic Instruments in Pursuit of Organizational Good Governance and Green Human Resources Management in Cooperative Agencies, Work and Social Welfare. Refahj, 18(70), 241-270. https://doi.org/10.29252/refahj.18.70.241
Gholipour, H., & Abiri, R. (2022). Exploring the Scope of Science Governance: A Scoping Review. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 28(4), 69-93. https://doi.org/10.22034/irphe.2022.705224
Haider, S. A., Akbar, A., Tehseen, S., Poulova, P., & Jaleel, F. (2022). The impact of responsible leadership on knowledge sharing behavior through the mediating role of person-organization fit and moderating role of higher educational institute culture. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 100265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100265
Haslam, S. (2012). Psychology in organizations: The Social Identity approach. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446278819
Hendrickson, K. A., & Francis, K. A. (2020). Investigating authentic university academic care at a US non-mainland HBCU. In Improving classroom engagement and international development programs: International perspectives on humanizing higher education (pp. 59-74). https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120200000027006
HosseiniNasab, S. M., ShamiZanjani, M., & Gholipor, A. (2021). A competency model for chief digital officer as organizational governor of digital transformation. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 36(3), 835-860. https://doi.org/10.52547/jipm.36.3.835
Hwang, S. J., Quast, L. N., Center, B. A., Chung, C. T. N., Hahn, H. J., & Wohkittel, J. (2015). The impact of leadership behaviours on leaders' perceived job performance across cultures: Comparing the role of charismatic, directive, participative, and supportive leadership behaviours in the U.S. and four Confucian Asian countries. Human Resource Development International, 18(3), 259-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2015.1036226
Jackson, N. C., & Dunn-Jensen, L. M. (2021). Leadership succession planning for today's digital transformation economy: Key factors to build for competency and innovation. Business Horizons, 64(2), 273-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.11.008
Jamali, A. R., Bhutto, A., Khaskhely, M., & Sethar, W. (2022). Impact of leadership styles on faculty performance: Moderating role of organizational culture in higher education. Management Science Letters, 12(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2021.8.005
Jayasri, I. (2022). Academic Governance: Insights and the Way Forward. Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionales. https://doi.org/10.32725/acta.2022.007
Kansal, J., & Jain, N. (2019). Development of competency model and mapping of employees competencies for organizational development: A new approach. [Journal not provided]. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jimmy-Kansal/publication/334001448_Development_of_Competency_Model_and_Mapping_of_employees_Competencies_for_Organizational_Development_A_New_Approach/links/5d126cdba6fdcc2462a62b62/Development-of-Competency-Model-and-Mapping-of-employees-Competencies-for-Organizational-Development-A-New-Approach.pdf
Kaykha. (2020). Presenting a model of managers' competencies in the University of Medical Sciences based on thematic analysis. Medicine and Cultivation, 29(1), 24-36.
Lo, W. Y. W., & Tang, H. H. H. (2017). Dancing with global trends: Higher education policy and university governance in Hong Kong, 1997-2012. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 49(1), 53-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2017.1252736
Lubis, F. M., Rony, Z. T., & Aryanto, T. (2019). Digital leadership in managing work motivation of millennial employees. Asia Proceedings of Social Sciences, [Volume Not Provided], [Page Not Provided]. https://doi.org/10.31580/apss.v4i2.757
Macnaghten, P., & Chilvers, J. (2014). The future of science governance: Publics, policies, practices. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(3), 530-548. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1245j
Meraku, A. (2017). Role of leadership in organizational effectiveness. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 5(11), 336-340. https://doi.org/10.18178/joebm.2017.5.11.535
Migliore, L. A. (2012). Leadership, governance, and perceptions of trust in the higher education industry. Journal of Leadership Studies, 5(4), 30-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.20241
Mitchelmore, S., & Rowe, J. (2010). Entrepreneurial competencies: a literature review and development agenda. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 16(2), 92-111. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552551011026995
Munawir, M., Raharjo, K., Djalil, M. A., Syahputra, H., Muslim, B., & Adam, M. (2019). Dimensions of identity strength and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) in establishing good university governance and performance of religious ideology-based higher educations. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, [Volume Not Provided]. https://www.emerald.com/jarhe/article/11/2/250/193820
Nedeva, M., Tirado, M. M., & Thomas, D. A. (2023). Research governance and the dynamics of science: A framework for the study of governance effects on research fields. Research Evaluation, 32(1), 116-127. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac028
Nermend, M., Singh, S., & Singh, U. S. (2022). An evaluation of decision on paradigm shift in higher education by digital transformation. Procedia Computer Science, 207, 1959-1969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.255
Nunn, N. (2008). The long-term Effects of Africa's slave trades. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(1), 139-176. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2008.123.1.139
Obrecht, M., Feodorova, Z., & Rosi, M. (2022). Assessment of environmental sustainability integration into higher education for future experts and leaders. Journal of Environmental Management, 316, 115223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115223
Peters, B. G. (2024). Measuring governance: a political science perspective
Handbook on Measuring Governance. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802200645.00015
Quyên, Đ. T. N. (2014). Developing university governance indicators and their weighting system using a modified Delphi method. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 828-833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.144
Rambe, P., & Makhalemele, N. (2015). Relationship between managerial competencies of Owners/managers of emerging technology firms and Business performance: A conceptual framework of internet café performance in South Africa. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 14(4), 677. https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v14i4.9357
Redallah, A., Bentahar, S., & Bouchelaghem, A. (2023). Academic governance at the university Salah Boubnider Constantine 3. Jurnal EduScience (JES). https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v10i1.3942
Rony, Z. T., Lestari, T. S., Ismaniah, Y., Yasin, M., & Lubis, F. M. (2023). The complexity of leadership competence in universities in the 21st century. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2), 2276986. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2276986
Rony, Z. T., Lubis, F. M., Santoso, B., & Ryzkita, A. (2020). The relevance of political skills for leaders and managers in the Industrial revolution 4.0: A case study of the Indonesian private television industry. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity & Change, 12(1), 447-465. https://repository.ubharajaya.ac.id/3210/1/The%20Relevance%20of%20Political%20Skills.pdf
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 25(1), 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390002500101
Santiago, R., Carvalho, T., & Sousa, S. (2015). NPM reforms and professionals in health and higher education in Portugal. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(11), 757-768. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.979199
Saputra, K. A. K. (2023). Introduction to energy accounting in higher education: A theoretical discussion. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research Studies, 3(4), 594-599. https://doi.org/10.55677/ijssers/V03I4Y2023-09
Shyamala, S., & Gurudutta, J. (2024). Corporate governance dynamics in Indian academia: challenges and case study evaluations. In EPRA International Journal of Environmental, Economics, Commerce and Educational Management. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra17869
Sundaram, L. S. (2023). Existential Risk and Science Governance. In. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0336.03
Tabassi, A. A., Abdullah, A., & Bryde, D. J. (2019). Conflict Management, team coordination, and performance within multicultural temporary projects: Evidence from the construction industry. Project Management Journal, 50(1), 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972818818257
Tai, M. K., & Abdull Kareem, O. (2020). Headteacher change leadership competency: a study in Malaysian primary schools. Professional Development in Education, 46(2), 292-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1561494
Trakman, L. E. (2015). Public Responsibilities for Electoral Fraud Beyond Correlative Rights and Duties. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law, 31, 17. https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/merko31§ion=17
Trepanier, S., & Crenshaw, J. T. (2013). Succession planning: A call to action for nurse executives. Journal of Nursing Management, 21(7), 980-985. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12177
Wahab, A., & Tyasari, I. (2020). Entrepreneurial leadership for university leaders: A futuristic approach for Pakistani HEIs. Asia Pacific Management Review, 25(1), 54-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2019.09.002
Young, M. D. (2023). The development of educational leaders: History and contemporary practice in the United States
International Encyclopedia of Education. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.05050-8
Zakeri, M., & Kohandani, B. (2020). Preparing Competence-based CID Police Agents in Detecting Stolen Vehicles (Vol. 14). https://doi.org/10.22034/det.2020.94642

  • تاریخ دریافت 13 آذر 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 12 فروردین 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 07 بهمن 1404
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 مهر 1404