طراحی الگوی پرورش کارآفرینان ترکیبی در میان اعضای هیئت علمی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه کارآفرینی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران
2 دانشیار، گروه کارآفرینی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران
چکیده
هدف اصلی پژوهش طراحی مدل پرورش کارآفرینان ترکیبی در میان اعضای هیئت علمی بود. این پژوهش با رویکرد کیفی انجام شد و راهبرد آن نظریه­ پردازی داده ­بنیاد با به ­کارگیری رهیافت پارادایمی اشتراوس و کوربین بود. برای گردآوری داده­ ها با به ­کارگیری روش نمونه ­گیری هدفمند و گلوله برفی، با 16 نفر از اعضای هیئت علمی کارآفرین و صاحب کسب ­و کار مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته صورت گرفت و از اظهارات، اسناد و نقل‌قول‌ها، کتاب‌ها و مقالات مرتبط با موضوع پژوهش بهره گرفته شد. اعتبار پژوهش با استفاده از معیارهای معرفی ­شده­ لینکلن و گوبا بررسی و داده­ ها در سه مرحله کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی تجزیه و تحلیل شد. یافته ­ها حاکی از ظهور بیش از 200 کد و احصای 40 مفهوم از مصاحبه­ هاست. بر اساس این مفاهیم، شرایط علی شامل انگیزه­ های اقتصادی، نیاز روانی، تغییرات جهانی، تغییر در سیاستگذاری بالادستی، نرخ بالای شکست کسب‌وکارهای نوپا و داستان‌های موفقیت ترکیبی‌هاست. شرایط زمینه ­ای عبارت­ اند از: هنجارها و ارزش ­های حاکم بر جامعه و دانشگاه، آموزش­ های پایه ­ای، موقعیت ­های مکانی، آشفتگی محیط کسب ­و کار، قوانین فضای کسب­ و کار، فرهنگ عمومی غیرکارآفرینانه، رقابت­ های ناسالم، ضد ارزش بودن و ضعف در نظام آموزش و پرورش. ویژگی­ های شخصیتی افراد، صلاحیت و شایستگی­ های کارآفرینانه، ویژگی­ های جمعیت ­شناختی، تداخلات شغلی، تک بُعدی بودن تخصص افراد، تأمین مالی و بهره ­برداری از موقعیت شغلی، ضعف قوانین و آیین­ نامه­ های دانشگاهی،کارآفرینانه نبودن سیستم دانشگاه، مجریان قوانین، هزینه­ های کسب­ و کار و ضعف فرهنگ کارآفرینی اعضای هیئت علمی به‌عنوان شرایط مداخله ­گر شناسایی شدند. مهارت ­افزایی و توسعه­ مهارت‌های کسب ­و کار، دانش ­افزایی و آموزش کارآفرینی، انگیزش افراد، توسعه­ ارتباطات درون و برون دانشگاهی، توسعه­ زیرساخت­ ها، توسعه­ رهبری کارآفرینانه، فرهنگ و گفتمان ­سازی، حمایت و پشتیبانی مالی، اصلاحات قانونی و خط­ مشی­ گذاری و به‌کارگیری فضاهای کاری اشتراکی راهبردهایی جدی برای پرورش کارآفرینان ترکیبی در میان اعضای هیئت علمی هستند. درنهایت، پرورش کارآفرینان ترکیبی طبق نظر مصاحبه شوندگان پیامدهایی نظیر پیامدهای آموزشی، رفاه عینی و ذهنی استادان، توسعه دانشگاه کارآفرین و توسعه­ اقتصادی-اجتماعی را در پی خواهد داشت. می ­توان نتیجه گرفت که عوامل مختلف فردی، شغلی، فرهنگی- اجتماعی، قانونی، اقتصادی-محیطی و ساختاری- نهادی بر پرورش کارآفرینان ترکیبی در میان اعضای هیئت علمی اثرگذار است. برای پرورش این دسته از کارآفرینان لازم است ضمن زمینه­ سازی مناسب و رفع موانع موجود، با برنامه­ ریزی و سیاستگذاری درست اکوسیستم کارآفرینی را در دانشگاه‌ها توسعه داد و با توانمندسازی اعضای هیئت علمی و شبکه ­سازی، پرورش کارآفرینان ترکیبی در میان اعضای هیئت علمی را به پیش برد و از پیامدهای مثبت پرورش این دسته از کارآفرینان بهره‌مند شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Designing a Model for Nurturing Hybrid Entrepreneurs among University Faculty Members

نویسندگان English

Fataneh Baharvand 1
Bijan Rezaee 2
Nader Naderi 2
Yousef Mohamadifar 2
1 PhD. Student, Entrepreneurship Department, Social Sciences Faculty, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Entrepreneurship Department, Social Sciences Faculty, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
چکیده English

The main goal of this research is designing a model for nurturing hybrid entrepreneur among faculty members. This research was conducted with a qualitative approach and Grounded Theory strategy. Semi-structured interview was used as data collection tool. In order to collect data and by using the purposive sampling method, interviews were conducted with 16 faculty members who are entrepreneurs and business owners. The validity of the research was checked using the criteria introduced by Lincoln and Guba. Data analysis was done in three stages of open, axial, and selective coding. The findings indicated the emergence of 200 codes and 40 concepts. Based on these concepts, the causal conditions include "economic motivations", "psychological needs", "global changes", "change in upstream policies", "high failure rate of start-ups", and "success stories of hybrid entrepreneurs". Contextual conditions include "norms and values governing society and university", "basic education", "locations", "business environment confusion", "non-entrepreneurial public culture", "unhealthy competitions", "being anti-value", "cumbersome rules of the business environment", and "weakness in the education system". Furthermore, "people's personality traits", "entrepreneurial competencies", "demographic characteristics", "occupational interactions", "one-dimensionality of people's expertise", "supporting rules and regulations", "financing and exploitation of occupational relations", "weakness of university regulations", "non-entrepreneurial university system", "law enforcers", "business costs", and "weak entrepreneurial culture of faculty members" were identified as intervening conditions. In addition, serious strategies for nurturing hybrid entrepreneurs among faculty members consist of "development of business skills", "knowledge enhancement and entrepreneurship education", "motivation of people", "development of internal and external university communication", "development of infrastructures", "entrepreneurial leadership development", "discourse and culture creation", "financial support", "legal and policymaking reforms", and "using shared workspaces". Finally, nurturing hybrid entrepreneurs will result in consequences such as "educational consequences", "objective and subjective welfare of faculty members", "development of entrepreneurial university", and "social-economic development". According to the findings, it is possible to help the development of hybrid entrepreneurship among faculty members by creating a suitable condition and removing the obstacles. It is also possible to facilitate productivity and development of the society by optimally using the talent, expertise and abilities of knowledgeable people.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Nurturing Entrepreneurs
Hybrid Entrepreneurship
Faculty Members.

References

Adimi, S. A., Shahryari, J., Azadikhah, O., & Rezaei, M. (2021). Investigating the entrepreneurship of technical and vocational trainees (case study of Zahedan). Journal of Skill Training, 9(34), 125-146. https://www.sid.ir/paper/959409/en
Aghaei, T., Teymornjad, K., & Akhavanhezaveh, F. (2013). A study of university entrepreneurship from the perspectives of faculty members of Shahid Beheshti University. Social Development & Welfare Planning, 4(14), 183-208. https://doi.org/10.22054/qjsd.2013.3306
Aladejebi, O. (2020). Hybrid entrepreneurship: combining employment and self-employment in Nigeria. Archives of Business Research, 8(7), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.87.8725
Bagheri, M., & Namazian, M. (2012). Barriers to entrepreneurship in Iran, the role of localization and solutions
National Conference on Entrepreneurship and Management of Knowledge-Based Businesses.
Baradaran, M., & Hoseinpour, N. (2013). The relationship between social capital with subjective welfare among the staff of Ministry of Welfare and Social Security. Social Welfare, 13(49), 35-56. https://www.sid.ir/paper/56862/en
Demir, C., Werner, A., Kraus, S., & Jones, P. (2022). Hybrid entrepreneurship: a systematic literature review. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 34(1), 29-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2020.1764738
Denkenberger, D., Way, J., & Pearce, J. M. (2015). Educational pathways to remote employment in isolated communities. Journal of Human Security, 11(1), 34-44. https://doi.org/10.12924/johs2015.11010034
Ezzerhouni, A., & El Malki, T. (2022). Transitory hybrid entrepreneurship: a path to full-time entrepreneurship. International Journal of Accounting, Finance, Auditing, Management and Economics, 3(6-1), 6-1. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7378240
Faramarzinia, Z., Farhadirad, H., & Mehralizadeh, Y. (2016). Analysis of the feasibility of implementing an Entrepreneurial University model: A case study of Shahid Chamran University. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 18(71), 65-86. https://doi.org/10.22047/ijee.2016.31970
Ferreira, C. C. (2020). Experiential learning theory and hybrid entrepreneurship: factors influencing the transition to full-time entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(8), 1845-1863. https://www.emerald.com/ijebr/article/26/8/1845/117368
Folta, T. B., Delmar, F., & Wennberg, K. (2010). Hybrid entrepreneurship. Management Science, 56(2), 253-269. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1094
Gonzalez-Pernía, J. L., Jung, A., & Peña, I. (2015). Innovation-driven entrepreneurship in developing economies. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 27(9-10), 555-573. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1075602
Hasani, M., & Mahdizadeh, H. (2020). A comparison study on entrepreneurial competencies of hybrid entrepreneurs, wageworkers and other entrepreneurs. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 12(4), 541-560. https://doi.org/10.22059/jed.2020.289506.653127
Hoppe, M. (2016). Policy and entrepreneurship education. Small Business Economics, 46(1), 13-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9676-7
Indudewi, Y. (2015). Success factors of hybrid entrepreneurs: case study of Universitas Ciputra Academician. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5), 90-84. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5s5p84
Institute for Higher Education, R., & Planning. (2022). The first report in a series of reports "Explaining the country's progress in expanding justice in the field of higher education in the first forty years of the Islamic Revolution of Iran.".
Islamic Parliament Research, C. (2022). Review and pathology of the faculty promotion system; proposed package for revising the faculty promotion regulations, Deputy Director of Social and Cultural Researches, Cultural and Education Studies.
Keykha, A., & Ezati, M. (2021). Identifying factors hindering ecosystem development, entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial university. Innovation Management Journal, 10(2), 55-97. https://www.nowavari.ir/article_134308_en.html?lang=en
Khodadosti, M., Mohamadifar, Y., & Naderi, N. (2024). Conceptualization of hybrid entrepreneurs' success model in Iran. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 16(5), 347-367. https://doi.org/10.22059/jed.2024.356514.654159
Kurczewska, A., Mackiewicz, M., Doryń, W., & Wawrzyniak, D. (2020). Peculiarity of hybrid entrepreneurs - revisiting Lazear's theory of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 21, 277-300. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2020.11959
Lahikainen, K., Kolhinen, J., Ruskovaara, E., & Pihkala, T. (2019). Challenges to the development of an entrepreneurial university ecosystem: The case of a Finnish university campus. Industry and Higher Education, 33(2), 96-107. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091326
Luc, S., Chirita, G., Delvaux, E., & Kepnou, A. (2018). Hybrid entrepreneurship: employees climbing the entrepreneurial ladder. International Review of Entrepreneurship. https://www.tara.tcd.ie/bitstreams/6730c6be-5f82-4e38-8627-704218c7b369/download
Mohammadipour, R., Hasani, S. F., Yousefi, M., & Darabi, A. (2013). Obstacles to entrepreneurship and the role of entrepreneurship in the development of Iran's economy. The First National Conference on Business Management.
Mousavi, S. H., Salehi Omran, I., Farasatkhah, M., & Towfighi, J. (2018). Providing a model for development of entrepreneurial university in Iran. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 19(76), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.22047/ijee.2018.98838.1481
Netshikulwe, P. (2023). The role of entrepreneurial support structures on hybrid entrepreneurial activity
Research project submitted to the Gordon Institute of Business Science. https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/95894
Pourjavid, S., Khosravipour, B., & Alibaygi, A. (2021). Components of institutionalizing the fourth generation of universities in agricultural higher education in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Education Administration Research, 12(55), 170-186. https://doi.org/10.22092/jaear.2021.124304
Qaderzadeh, O., & Faraji, S. (2014). An analysis of experience of dual-job teachers; a qualitative study of reasons and consequences. Strategy for Culture, 7(26), 119-146. https://www.jsfc.ir/article_15128_en.html?lang=en
Raffiee, J., & Feng, J. (2014). Should I quit my day job?: a hybrid path to entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 936-963. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0522
Rol, Y., & Atson, N. (2014). Entrepreneurial characteristics amongst university students: Some insights for entrepreneurship education and training in Turkey. Education + Training, 48(1), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910610645716
Salamzadeh, A., Salamzadeh, Y., & Daraei, M. R. (2011). Toward a Systematic Framework for an Entrepreneurial University: A Study in Iranian Context with an IPOO Model. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 3(1), 30-37. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED530376
Sarfraz, A. M. (2010). Can entrepreneurial university model help Pakistan leapfrog into the knowledge economy? Some reflections
Prosperity through Quality Education. In.
Schulz, M., Urbig, D., & Procher, V. (2016). Hybrid entrepreneurship and public policy: the case of firm entry deregulation. Journal of Business Venturing, 31, 272-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.01.002
Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167
Suresh, J., & Ramraj, R. (2012). Entrepreneurial ecosystem: case study on the influence of environmental factors on entrepreneurial success. European Journal of Business and Management, 4(16), 95-102. https://www.academia.edu/download/30077161/Entrepreneurial_Ecosystem.pdf
Tabatabaei, F., Abbaspour, A., Rahimian, H., & Ghiasi nadoushan, S. (2020). Designing a model for Nurturing entrepreneurs at public universities in Tehran. Innovation Management in Defensive Organizations, 3(2), 125-150. https://doi.org/10.22034/qjimdo.2020.210436.1233
Thornberry, N. (2006). Lead like an entrepreneur. Blacklick, OH: McGraw-Hill. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130000795019858688
Volchek, D., Saarenketo, S., & Jantunen, A. (2015). Structural Model of Institutional Environment Influence on International Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies
In: Institutional Impacts on Firm Internationalization. In (pp. 190-216). London: Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137446350_9
Yan, X. (2021). Employment and entrepreneurship education for university students based on improved ACO algorithm and embedded database. Microprocessors and Microsystems, 104087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpro.2021.104087
Yarmohammadzadeh, P., Mahdion, R., & Beikzadeh, S. (2021). Identifying the factors affecting the tendency of graduate professors and students to knowledge-based entrepreneurship from the perspective of experts. Journal of Iranian Higher Education, 12(4), 128-154. https://ihej.ir/article-1-1440-en.html
Yunita, T., Wijayanti, M., Bukhari, E., & Prasety, E. T. (2022). The Dilemma of Innovative Behavior of Hybrid Entrepreneurs in the Role of Employee. Journal Maksipreneur: Manajemen, Koperasi, dan Entrepreneurship, 11(2), 253-268. https://doi.org/10.30588/jmp.v11i2.932
Zahedifar, F., Labadi, Z., & Parseteh Qombavani, F. (2022). Identifying and developing a model for the development of entrepreneurial competencies of university faculty members. Journal of Education Development in Medical Sciences, 14(44), 34-41.
Zampetakis, L. A. (2007). Entrepreneurial behavior in the Greek public sector. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 13(1), 19-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550710725165
Zhao, F. (2016). Academic entrepreneurship: case study of Australian universities. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 5, 91-97. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000004773863246
 

  • تاریخ دریافت 03 بهمن 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 31 فروردین 1404
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 فروردین 1405