واکاوی موانع خودکارآمدی پژوهشی در میان دانشجویان؛ مطالعه موردی دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان

نویسندگان
حامد ایزدی 1
بهمن خسروی پور 2
مسلم سواری 3
1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده مهندسی زراعی و عمران روستایی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان، ملاثانی، ایران.
2 استاد، گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان، اهواز، ایران.
3 دانشیار، گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان، اهواز، ایران.
10.61838/KMAN.IRPHE.31.3.5
چکیده
انجام دادن پژوهش از فرایندها و مهارت­ های مهم و اساسی برای دانشجویان، به­ ویژه در مقاطع بالا؛ یعنی تحصیلات تکمیلی است و در بهبود فرایندهای آموزشی و گسترش خدمات علمی در جامعه تأثیر فراوانی دارد. یکی از مهم ­ترین عوامل مؤثر بر انجام دادن تحقیق در دانشجویان، باورهای آن­ها به توانایی­ هایشان در این زمینه است. خودکارآمدی پژوهشی پیش ­بینی چشمگیری برای بهره ­وری پژوهش در میان دانشجویان و به­ عنوان پیش­ بینی کننده مهمی برای پایداری و پیشرفت تحصیلی دانشجویان تأیید می­ شود. هدف این پژوهش واکاوی موانع خودکارآمدی پژوهشی در میان دانشجویان با استفاده از نظریه بنیانی بود. با توجه به مد نظر بودن رویکرد اکتشافی در واکاوی موانع از دیدمان کیفی استفاده شد. جامعه آماری پژوهش دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی دانشگاه­ علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان بودند. روش اصلی گردآوری داده ­ها مصاحبه ­ی عمیق نیمه ساختاریافته بود. پس از مطالعه و ارزیابی و دریافت نظر مشاوران، سؤالات مصاحبه نهایی طراحی و مصاحبه آغاز شد و تا حد اشباع داده­ ها (26 نفر) ادامه یافت. نمونه ­گیری به­ صورت نظری بود و داده­ ها بر اساس دستورالعمل­ های ارائه شده توسط اشتراوس و کوربین طی سه مرحله اصلی کدگذاری باز، کدگذاری محوری و کدگذاری انتخابی تحلیل شد. با تحلیل متن مصاحبه ­ها، طی کدگذاری باز، 123 کد مفهومی استخراج شد. مفاهیم طی سلسله ­مراتب کدگذاری در نظریه مبنایی، در قالب 15 مقوله محوری دسته ­بندی شدند. شرایط علّی (عوامل فردمحور، عوامل دانشگاه ­محور و عوامل محیط­ محور)، شرایط زمینه ­ای (درون دانشگاه و بیرون دانشگاه)، شرایط مداخله­ گر (شخص، دانشگاه و جامعه)، راهبرد (تلاش­ های فردی، اصلاحات دانشگاهی و تعامل با فناوری) و پیامد (اثرهای فردی، شایسته ­گزینی، اشتغال ­زایی و نیروی کار حرفه ­ای و گسترش دانش) طی کدگذاری، نهایی و در قالب مدل مفهومی ارائه شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Analyzing research self-efficacy barriers among students (case study: Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan)

نویسندگان English

Hamed Izadi 1
Bahman Khosravipour 2
Moslem Savari 3
1 PhD student, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Rural Civil Engineering, Khuzestan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Mulathani, Iran.
2 Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Khuzestan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Ahvaz, Iran.
3 Associate Professor, Agricultural Extension and Education Department, Khuzestan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Ahvaz, Iran.
چکیده English

Conducting research is one of the important and essential processes and skills for students, especially at higher levels, postgraduate studies and it will have a great impact on improving educational processes and expanding scientific services in society. One of the most important factors affecting students' research is their beliefs about their abilities in this field. Research self-efficacy is a significant predictor of research productivity among students and it is confirmed as an important predictor for the stability and academic progress of students. The purpose of this research was to analyze the barriers to research self-efficacy among students using grounded theory. Due to considering the exploratory approach in the analysis of obstacles, a qualitative approach was used. The statistical population of this research was graduate students of Khuzestan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. The main method of data collection was semi-structured in-depth interview. After studying and evaluating and receiving the opinions of the consultants, the final interview questions were designed, the initial interview and these interviews continued until data saturation (26 people). Sampling in this method is theoretical sampling and data analysis was done based on the guidelines provided by Strauss and Corbin during three main stages of open coding, axial coding and selective coding. By analyzing the text of the interviews, during open coding 123 conceptual codes were extracted. concepts, during the hierarchy of coding in the basic theory they were categorized in 15 core categories. Causal conditions (person-centered factors, university-centered factors, environment-centered factors), contextual conditions (inside the university, outside the university), intervening conditions (person, university, society), strategy (individual efforts, academic reforms, interaction with technology) and the outcome (individual effects, merit selection, job creation and professional workforce, knowledge expansion) was finalized during coding and presented in the form of a conceptual model.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

graduate
research self-efficacy
Graduate students
ground theory
Abedi, A., Arizi, H., & Mohammadzadeh, F. (2006). An introduction to the meta-analytical research method in educational research. Journal Field and University, 49(12), 1-18.
Baltes, B., Hoffman-Kipp, P., Lynn, L., & Weltzer-Ward, L. (2010). Students' Research Self-Efficacy during Online Doctoral Research Courses. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 3(3), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v3i3.187
Black, M. L., Curran, M. C., Golshan, S., Daly, R., Depp, C., Kelly, C., & Jeste, D. V. (2013). Summer research training for medical students: impact on research self‐efficacy. Clinical and Translational Science, 6(6), 487-489. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12062
Forester, M., Kahn, J. H., & Hesson-McInnis, M. S. (2004). Factor structures of three measures of research self-efficacy. Journal of Career Assessment, 12(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072703257719
Gravand, H., Karshki, H., & Ahanchian, M. (2013). The relationship between research self-efficacy and research performance in students of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 14(1), 41-51. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Masoud-Rezaei-28/publication/369927748_THE_RELATIONSHIP_BETWEEN_RESEARCH_SELF-EFFICACY_RESEARCH_ANXIETY_AND_ATTITUDE_TOWARD_RESEARCH_A_STUDY_OF_AGRICULTURAL_GRADUATE_STUDENTS/links/64353d49609c170a130cae55/THE-RELATIONSHIP-BETWEEN-RESEARCH-SELF-EFFICACY-RESEARCH-ANXIETY-AND-ATTITUDE-TOWARD-RESEARCH-A-STUDY-OF-AGRICULTURAL-GRADUATE-STUDENTS.pdf
Hemmings, B., & Kay, R. (2010). Research self‐efficacy, publication output, and early career development. International Journal of Educational Management, 24(7), 562-574. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541011079978
Kahn, J. H. (2001). Predicting the scholarly activity of counseling psychology students: A refinement and extension. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(3), 344. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.48.3.344
Karsheki, H., & Bahmanabadi, S. (2012). Evaluation of the components and factor structure of research self-efficacy in graduate students. Research and Planning Quarterly in Higher Education, 19(2), 114-191.
Kazemi Vardanjani, A., Heydari Sureshjani, S., & Drees, F. (2016). Investigating the components of research self-efficacy in graduate students. Research Quarterly in Medical Science Education, 9(2), 65-57. https://doi.org/10.29252/rme.9.2.65
King, M. (2000). The mentoring of graduate students. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/items/1f447d67-2924-44fc-ab2e-927350c8b7a7
Lamar, M. R., & Helm, H. M. (2017). Understanding the researcher identity development of counselor education and supervision doctoral students. Counselor Education and Supervision, 56(1), 2-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12056
Liu, X., Zhou, J., Xue, Y., & Qian, S. (2019). Analysis of property management ecological behavior in China based on the grounded theory: The influencing factors and the behavior model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 44-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.300
Mullikin, E. A., Bakken, L. L., & Betz, N. E. (2007). Assessing research self-efficacy in physician-scientists: the clinical research appraisal inventory. Journal of Career Assessment, 15(3), 367-387. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072707301232
Petko, J. T., Sivo, S. A., & Lambie, G. W. (2020). The research self-efficacy, interest in research, and research mentoring experiences of doctoral students in counselor education. Journal of Counselor Preparation and Supervision, 13(1), 3. https://research.library.kutztown.edu/jcps/vol13/iss1/3/
Poh, R., & Abdullah, A. G. B. K. (2019). Factors influencing students' research self-efficacy: A case study of university students in Malaysia. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 19(82), 137-168. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.82.8
Roshniyan Ramin, M., & Aghazadeh, M. (2013). Research self-efficacy among master's students in psychology and educational sciences. Research in Curriculum Planning, 2(12), 1-9.
Salehi, M., Karsheki, H., Ahanchian, M., & Karimi-Monaghi, H. (2011). Validation of research self-efficacy scale of graduate students of Mashhad and Ferdowsi Universities of Medical Sciences. Journal of Education in Medical Sciences, 12(6), 396-409.
Sawtelle, V., Brewe, E., & Kramer, L. H. (2013). Sequential logistic regression: A method to reveal subtlety in self-efficacy. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1193&context=sferc
Shafiei, M., Salimi, Q., Mohammadi, M., & Mokhtari, Z. (2017). Research self-efficacy and professional decision-making self-efficacy of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences students; Providing an explanatory model. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 18(7), 49-59.
Vaccaro, N. (2009). The relationship between research self-efficacy, perceptions of the research training environment and interest in research. https://search.proquest.com/openview/0c77ccd1f2e4924478f827cea3024967/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
Wildauer, J. (2017). Reflected Academic self-efficacy: How teacher behavior influences self-efficacy in the classroom. Minnesota State University, Mankato. https://search.proquest.com/openview/c3e91f62df39109a6c447773f9bf7f82/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
Yasini, A., & Taban, M. (2015). Presenting and testing the explanatory model of the research self-efficacy of humanities students in the research-oriented space and environment: case study, universities in the west of the country. Quarterly Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 4(32), 1-22.

  • تاریخ دریافت 10 مرداد 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 30 مهر 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 28 آبان 1403
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 مهر 1404