شناسایی و تحلیل شایستگی ها و مسئولیت های دانشجویان دکتری دانشگاه شیراز در برابر راهنمایی‌های پژوهشی استاد راهنما

نویسندگان
نیره حسینی 1
قاسم سلیمی 2
1 استادیار، گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران.
2 دانشیار، دانشکده علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران.
10.61838/KMAN.IRPHE.31.2.2
چکیده
پژوهش حاضر پژوهشی کیفی است که با روش پدیدارشناسی و با هدف کاوش ادراکات مشارکت­ کنندگان پژوهش از شایستگی ­ها و مسئولیت ­های دانشجوی دکتری در نقش یک ارشادشوندة پژوهشی در تعامل با استادراهنمای خود انجام شد. داده ­ها با مصاحبه ­های نیمه ­ساختمند با 20 عضو هیئت علمی و 20 دانشجوی دکتری جمع­ آوری شد که به ­صورت هدفمند و با روش معیارمحور و استراتژی حداکثر تنوع انتخاب شدند. داده ­ها با روش تحلیل مضمون تحلیل شد. بر اساس یافته ­های پژوهش، شایستگی­ های دانشجو در نقش ارشادشوندة پژوهشی مشتمل بر 4 مؤلفة (مضمون سازمان­ دهندة) شایستگی­ های علمی ـ پژوهشی، شایستگی­ های حرفه ­ای، شایستگی­ های میان­ فردی و شایستگی­ های فردی و نیز مسئولیت­ های دانشجو در نقش ارشادشوندة پژوهشی متشکل از دو مؤلفة (مضمون سازمان­ دهندة) رفتارهای وظیفه­ محور و رفتارهای رابطه­ محور است. شناخت شایستگی­ ها و مسئولیت­ های مذکور و توجه بیشتر به آن‌ها و بهسازی وضعیت موجود می ­تواند تحقق رابطة ارشادگری پژوهشی بین استاد و دانشجو و بهره ­برداری از مزایای متعدد آن را تسهیل سازد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Identifying and Analyzing the Competencies and Responsibilities of Doctoral Students at Shiraz University in Relation to Research Guidance by Supervisors

نویسندگان English

Nayyereh Hosseini 1
Ghasem Salimi 2
1 Assistant Professor, Educational Management Department, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
چکیده English

The current research is a qualitative study that was conducted with the phenomenological method, aiming to explore the perceptions of research participants about the competencies and responsibilities of a doctoral student in the role of a research mentee in interaction with their supervisor. The data were collected by conducting semi-structured interviews with 20 faculty members and 20 doctoral students who were selected using purposive sampling and with criteria-based method and maximum diversity strategy. Data analysis was conducted using thematic analysis. Based on the findings, the competencies of students in the role of research mentees include four organizing themes: scientific-research competencies, professional competencies, interpersonal competencies, and individual competencies. The responsibilities of students in the role of research mentees consist of two organizing themes: task-oriented behaviors and relationship-oriented behaviors. Recognizing and paying greater attention to these competencies and responsibilities, as well as improving the current situation, can facilitate the realization of an effective research mentoring relationship between supervisors and students, thereby maximizing its benefits.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

competencies of research mentee
responsibilities of research mentee
doctoral student
supervisor
research mentoring relationship
Altbach, P. G. (2007). Doctoral education: Present realities and future trends. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4012-2_5
Amador-Campos, J. A., Peró-Cebollero, M., Feliu-Torruella, M., Pérez-González, A., Cañete-Massé, C., Jarne-Esparcia, A. J., & Guàrdia-Olmos, J. (2023). Mentoring and research self-efficacy of doctoral students: a psychometric approach. Education Sciences, 13(4), 358. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040358
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic Networks: An Analytic Tool for Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307
Boeren, E., Lokhtina-Antoniou, I., Sakurai, Y., Herman, C., & McAlpine, L. (2015). Mentoring: A Review of early career researcher studies. Frontline Learning Research, 3(3), 68-80. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1091054
Borders, L. D., Wester, K. L., Granello, D. H., Chang, C. Y., Hays, D. G., Pepperell, J., & Spurgeon, S. L. (2012). Association for Counselor Education and Supervision guidelines for research mentorship: Development and implementation. Counselor Education and Supervision, 51(3), 162-175. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.2012.00012.x
Briggs, C. A. (2006). Research Mentorship in Counselor Education. Oregon State University. https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/graduate_thesis_or_dissertations/4f16c636g
Curtin, N., Malley, J., & Stewart, A. J. (2016). Mentoring the next generation of faculty: Supporting academic career aspirations among doctoral students. Research in Higher Education, 57(6), 714-738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9403-x
Echresh, S., Beiramipoor, A., & Parsa, A. (2023). A phenomenological study of the challenges of transitioning to virtual learning in Iranian universities with regard to the Corona pandemic. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 29(1), 113-138. https://doi.org/10.61838/irphe.29.1.5
Faraji Dehsorkhi, H., Arasteh, H., Navehebrahim, A., & Abdollahi, B. (2016). Identifying doctoral admissions criteria: a qualitative study. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 21(4), 71-97. https://journal.irphe.ac.ir/article_702885_en.html
Haider, Z., & Dasti, R. (2022). Mentoring, research self-efficacy, work-life balance and psychological well-being of doctoral program students. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 11(2), 170-182. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-07-2020-0036
Hernandez, P. R., Ferguson, C. F., Pedersen, R., Richards-Babb, M., Quedado, K., & Shook, N. J. (2023). Research apprenticeship training promotes faculty-student psychological similarity and high-quality mentoring: A longitudinal quasi-experiment. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 31(1), 163-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2023.2164973
Hosseini, N. (2020). Model of Supervisor-PhD student research mentoring: A mixed method study. Shiraz University. https://journal.irphe.ac.ir/article_702986_en.html?lang=fa
Keyser, D. J., Lakoski, J. M., Lara-Cinisomo, S., Schultz, D. J., Williams, V. L., Zellers, D. F., & Pincus, H. A. (2008). Advancing institutional efforts to support research mentorship: A conceptual framework and self-assessment tool. Academic Medicine, 83(3), 217-225. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b13e318163700a
Kostovich, C., Saban, K., & Collins, E. (2010). Becoming a nurse researcher: the importance of mentorship. Nursing Science Quarterly, 23(4), 281-286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318410380260
Laverick, D. M. (2016). The Mentoring Process. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39217-2
Lee, H. F., Miozzo, M., & Laredo, P. (2010). Career patterns and competences of PhDs in science and engineering in the knowledge economy: The case of graduates from a UK research-based university. Research Policy, 39(7), 869-881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.001
Maisel, N. C., Halvorson, M. A., Finney, J. W., Bi, X., Hayashi, K. P., Blonigen, D. M., & Cronkite, R. C. (2017). Institutional Incentives for Mentoring at the US Department of Veterans Affairs and Universities: Associations With Mentors' Perceptions and Time Spent Mentoring. Academic Medicine, 92(4), 521-527. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001507
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. Jossey-Bass. https://books.google.com/books/about/Qualitative_Research.html?id=tvFICrgcuSIC
Muthuswamy, S., & Molfino, R. (2017). Student-Supervisor Relationship in the Process of Managing a Ph. D.: Engineering Perspective. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 143(4), 02517001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000327
Nerad, M. (2004). The PhD in the US: Criticisms, facts, and remedies. Higher Education Policy, 17(2), 183-199. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300050
Pfund, C., Byars-Winston, A., Branchaw, J., Hurtado, S., & Eagan, K. (2016). Defining attributes and metrics of effective research mentoring relationships. AIDS and Behavior, 20(2), 238-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1384-z
Sanfey, H., Hollands, C., & Gantt, N. L. (2013). Strategies for building an effective mentoring relationship. The American Journal of Surgery, 206(5), 714-718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.08.001
Steber, H. S., Fishler, K. P., & McBrien, S. B. (2023). Characterizing the research mentorship experience of genetic counseling students. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 32(6), 1301-1313. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1811
Ulrich, C. M., & Grady, C. (2003). Research mentors: an understated value? Nursing Research, 52(3), 139. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200305000-00001
Vierra, K. D., Beltran, D. R., Denecker, L., & Robnett, R. D. (2024). "Research Mentors Should Support Students of Color by Taking an Extra Step." Undergraduates' Reasoning about Race and STEM Research Mentorship. Education Sciences, 14(2), 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020162
Wekullo, C. S., Ouda, J. B., Keseko, E., Shiundu, J. O., & Poipoi Moses, W. (2024). Mentorship for capacity building among young scholars in knowledge translation, research, and practice in universities in Kenya. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 32(2), 165-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2024.2323475
Young, B. R., Williamson, H. J., Burton, D. L., Massey, O. T., Levin, B. L., & Baldwin, J. A. (2015). Challenges and benefits in designing and implementing a team-based research mentorship experience in translational research. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 1(4), 233-246. https://doi.org/10.1177/2373379915600174
 

  • تاریخ دریافت 08 فروردین 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 27 مهر 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 19 آبان 1403
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 تیر 1404