بررسی پایگاه اقتصادی- اجتماعی دانشجویان دانشگاه ‎های دولتی تهران

نویسندگان
یزدان ابراهیمی 1
زهرا چاووشی 2
احمدرضا روشن 3
1 گروه اقتصاد آموزش عالی و بررسی های نیروی انسانی، مؤسسه پژوهش و برنامه ریزی آموزش عالی
2 دانش آموخته دکتری مدیریت آموزش عالی، دانشگاه خوارزمی
3 گروه مطالعات مدیریت آموزش عالی، مؤسسه پژوهش و برنامه ریزی آموزش عالی
10.61838/KMAN.IRPHE.31.2.4
چکیده
هدف از این پژوهش بررسی خاستگاه اقتصادی- اجتماعی دانشجویانی است که در دانشگاه‌های دولتی وابسته به وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری تحصیل می­ کنند. پژوهش حاضر از نظر گردآوری داده ­ها در دستۀ پژوهش­ های توصیفی (غیرآزمایشی) قرار می‌گیرد؛ برای تحلیل داده­ ها با توجه به هدف پژوهش، از روش تحقیق توصیفی از نوع علّی- مقایسه ­ای استفاده شد. جامعه آماری دانشجویان دانشگاه‌های منتخب وابسته به وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری در تهران بودند. حجم نمونه با استفاده از فرمول کوکران 635 نفر بود. نمونه گیری در دانشگاه‎ های منتخب به­ صورت خوشه‎ ای چند مرحله ‎ای و نمونه‎ گیری از داخل خوشه ‎ها به­­ صورت تصادفی صورت گرفت.  ابزار گردآوری داده ­ها پرسشنامه محقق­ ساخته بود که از مصاحبه هدفمند با 10 نفر از افراد متخصص و آگاه به موضوع پژوهش تهیه شد و ضریب پایایی آن به کمک آلفای کرونباخ 0.704 به ­دست آمد. تجزیه و تحلیل داده ‎ها و همبستگی بین متغیر پایگاه اقتصادی اجتماعی با سایر متغیرها با استفاده از نرم ­افزار spss صورت گرفت. یافته ‏ها حاکی از آن است که دسترسی افراد متعلق به پایگاه اقتصادی اجتماعی در دانشگاه‌های دولتی تهران نابرابر است و دانشجویان متعلق به پایگاه‎ های متوسط و متوسط به بالا بیشتر از تحصیل در دانشگاه‌های دولتی بهره ‎مند می‎ شوند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Survey of the Socio-economic Status of Students at Tehran Public Universities

نویسندگان English

Yazdan Ebrahimi 1
Zahra Chavoshi 2
Ahmad Reza Roshan 3
1 Department of Higher Education Economics and Manpower Surveys, Higher Education Research and Planning Institute
2 PhD graduate of Higher Education Management, Kharazmi University
3 Department of Higher Education Management Studies, Higher Education Research and Planning Institute
چکیده English

The purpose of this article is to survey of the socio-economic status of students at Tehran public universities. By use of descriptive approach, purposeful and snowball sampling method was used to select people for research interviews. Interviews reached to saturation by 10 samples. The data collection tool was a researcher-made questionnaire based on the findings of the first section. Students of selected universities are the statistical population in this stage. The sample was Cochran's formula was 635 people. Quantitative data analysis was done using SPSS. The findings showed that access to public universities in Tehran is unequal.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Socio-economic status
Students
Tehran public universities
Abonory, E., & Mohamadi, A. (2017). Investigating the effect of economic policies on the inequality of educational opportunities in Iran. Quarterly Journal Of Education(132), 93-112. http://qjoe.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-107-121&slc_lang=other&sid=1
Amaral, A. (2018). Universities and the Knowledge Society Revisited. Peter Lang. https://www.cipes.pt/node/3464?language=en
Anders, J., & Jerrim, J. (2014). The socio-economic gradient in educational attainment and labour market outcomes: a cross-national comparison. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10051407/
Ansari, E., & Sanatkhah, A. (2018). Examining the theories of social stratification with emphasis on Iran's social conditions. Quarterly Journal of Social Profesinal Journal of Social Sciences of Islamic Azad University(14), 143-172. https://elmnet.ir/article/10113010-25857
Blanden, J., & Macmillan, L. (2016). Educational inequality, educational expansion and intergenerational mobility. Journal of Social Policy, 45(4), 589-614. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279416000350
Fazaeli, A., Alizadeh Hanjani, A., & Alizadeh Hanjani, H. (2015). Justice in the health sector from the point of view of moral schools. Social Welfare Quarterly, 11-26. https://refahj.uswr.ac.ir/browse.php?a_id=1999&sid=1&slc_lang=fa
Ghasemi A, A., Heydarabadi, A., & Rostami, N. (2013). Family contexts of inequality of educational opportunities, case study: Higher school female students of Ahar city. Quarterly Profesinal Journal of Sociology(1), 125-148. https://www.sid.ir/paper/170180/%C3%98%C2%AE%C3%98%C2%B1%C3%9B%C5%92%C3%98%C2%AF%20%C3%98%C2%A7%C3%99%E2%80%9A%C3%98%C2%B3%C3%98%C2%A7%C3%98%C2%B7%C3%9B%C5%92%20%C3%9A%C2%AF%C3%99%CB%86%C3%98%C2%B4%C3%9B%C5%92%20%C3%98%C2%A2%C3%9B%C5%92%C3%99%20%C3%99%CB%86%C3%99%E2%80%A0%2014
Jamali, E. (2012). The effect of social and economic status on the academic performance of university entrance exam candidates during the years 2001 to 2009. Quarterly Journal of Iranian Higher Education(4). https://www.sid.ir/paper/135835/fa
James, R. (2002). Socioeconomic Background and Higher Education Participation: An analysis of school students 'aspirations and expectations. https://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv:2433
Kazemipour, S. (1999). A model in determining the socioeconomic status of people and measuring social mobility based on a case study in Tehran. Sociological Review, 139-172. https://jnoe.ut.ac.ir/article_14796.html
Khan Afzali, G. (2004). Rawls' theory of justice; Seeking justice or anti-justice. Journals Reference(79), 50-54.
Koen, B. (1991). An introduction to sociology. Farhang Moaaser Publications. https://www.amazon.de/-/en/Introduction-Sociology-Ken-Browne/dp/1509528008
Kosunen, S., Haltia, N., Saari, J., Jokila, S., & Halmkrona, E. (2021). Private supplementary tutoring and socio-economic differences in access to higher education. Higher Education Policy, 34, 949-968. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00177-y
Naderi, B. (2016). Way of life in social strata. Qanunya.
Natkhov, T., & Kozina, N. (2012). Inequality of Educational Opportunity in a Cross-Section of Countries: Empirical Analysis of 2009 PISA Data. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2179525
Oecd. (2018). Education at a Glance, OECD Briefing Note for UK. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2018/09/education-at-a-glance-2018_g1g921ab.html
Palmisano, F., Biagi, F., & Peragine, V. (2022). Inequality of opportunity in tertiary education: evidence from Europe. Research in Higher Education, 1-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-021-09658-4
Pashaei, A., Hassani, M., Mohajeran, B., & Shahbazi, K. (2023). Analyzing the effect of economics education on students' financial literacy and decision-making with the moderating role of the family's socio-economic status. Institution for Research and Planning in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.61838/KMAN.IRPHE.29.4.2
Reinders, S., Dekker, M., & Falisse, J. B. (2021). Inequalities in higher education in low‐and middle‐income countries: A scoping review of the literature. Development Policy Review, 39(5), 865-889. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12535
Roemer, J. E. (1998). Equality of opportunity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042872
Roshan, A. (2003). "Determining Socio-Economic status (SES)".
Roshan, A. (2004). Access to higher education. https://irphe.ac.ir/content/3334/Mr.-Ahmad-Reza-Roshan
Shields, L., Newman, A., & Satz, D. (2017). Equality of educational opportunity. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy SEPIA for Libraries. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/equal-ed-opportunity/?ref=luatkhoa.com
Tavares, O., Sá, C., Sin, C., & Amaral, A. (2022). Equity policies in global higher education: Reducing inequality and increasing participation and attainment. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69691-7
van de Gaer, D. (1993). Equality of opportunity and investment in human capital Catholic University of Louvain]. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=6863044
Wilkinson, R., Pickett, K., & Cato, M. S. (2009). The spirit level. Why more equal societies almost always do better. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00167487.2010.12094298
 

  • تاریخ دریافت 06 خرداد 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 04 مهر 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 10 مهر 1403
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 تیر 1404