برساخت فردی-سازمانی پژوهش از دیدگاه اعضای هیئت‌ علمی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
فریبا دنیوی 1
فاطمه مکی زاده 2
حسین افراسیابی 3
ابوالفضل اسدنیا 4
زهرا فلک الدین 5
1 دانشجوی دکتری پردیس علوم اجتماعی و انسانی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران
2 دانشیار، گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران
3 دانشیار، گروه جامعه شناسی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران
4 استادیار، گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شهید باهنر، کرمان، ایران
5 دکتری جامعه شناسی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران
10.61838/KMAN.IRPHE.30.3.2
چکیده
عوامل مؤثر بر فعالیت‌های آموزشی و پژوهشی اعضای هیئت‌علمی دانشگاه‌ها به‌طور خاص موضوعی پرجاذبه و بحث‌برانگیز است که تحقیقات متعددی را به دنبال داشته است، پژوهش حاضر نیز به‌منظور واکاوی دیدگاه اعضای هیئت‌علمی در مورد فعالیت‌های پژوهشی در دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی انجام‌گرفته است. پژوهش حاضر کیفی با استراتژی داده بنیاد است. برای جمع آوری داده ­ها با 15 نفر از اعضای هیات علمی دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی مصاحبه ساختار نیافته انجام گرفت. داده­ ها با روش شش مرحله ­ای برونو وکلارک شامل آشنا شدن با داده­ ها، ایجاد کدهای اولیه، جستجو و شناخت مضامین، ترسیم شبکه مضامین، تحلیل شبکه مضامین و تدوین گزارش تحلیل شد. شکل‌گیری فعالیت‌های پژوهشی تحت تأثیر پنج عامل کلی مهارت فردی و حرفه‌ای، شرایط آکادمیک، راهبردهای تسهیلگر، ساختارهای سازمان محور و ساختارهای برون‌سازمانی بررسی و مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت. هر یک از این عوامل به‌عنوان مضمون اصلی شامل خرده مضامین فرعی نیز بودند. با مرور مضامین،‌‌ درنهایت از بین مضامین اصلی به‌دست‌آمده «برساخت فردی-سازمانی پژوهش» یعنی عوامل فردی و سازمانی مؤثر بر پژوهش به‌عنوان اندیشه مرکزی و مرتبط با سایر مضامین شناسایی شد. اگر چه عوامل فردی در اختیار پژوهشگران است و آن‌ها تلاش دارند تا ویژگی ­های فردی و حرفه­ای خود نظیر مهارت‌آموزی، انجام وظایف شغلی و افزایش سواد علمی را به جهت انجام پژوهش افزایش دهند اما تا زمانی که عوامل سازمانی که در حیطه اختیار آن‌ها نیست تسهیل کننده امر پژوهش نباشد، نمی ­توان انتظار رشد و توسعه پژوهشی و علمی را داشت.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Individual-organizational construction of research from the opinions of faculty members

نویسندگان English

Fariba Danivi 1
Fatemeh Makkizadeh 2
Hossein Afrasiabi 3
Abolfazl Asadnia 4
Zahra Falakodin 5
1 Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social science, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of knowledge and information science, Faculty of Social Science, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Science, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
4 Assistant professor, Department of knowledge and information science, Faculty of literature and humanities, Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman, Iran
5 PhD, Sociology, Faculty of Social science, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
چکیده English

Factors affecting the educational and research activities of university faculty members is a particularly interesting and controversial topic that has led to numerous researches. The present study was also conducted in order to analyze the opinion of faculty members about research activities in Mohaghegh Ardabili University. In order to collect the findings using interviews, the opinions of experienced and leading research faculty members were analyzed. the participants were 15 faculty members of different fields in three groups of basic sciences, humanities and technical engineering of Mohaghegh Ardabili University. Therefore, in this research, it was tried to select the studied sample from among the policy makers of the relevant fields of the scientific system, faculty members with group management experience, experts and specialists in the research subject, faculty members' research performance evaluation units, faculty members with management experience at the college and university level. , because these people, as cases rich in information and experiences, provide the best background for in-depth studies. The use of a specific method of data analysis in this approach led to the construction of a basic theme called "individual-social structure of research" based on which the proposed model is designed to describe the factors affecting the research activities of faculty members. The formation of research activities was investigated and analyzed under the influence of five general factors of personal and professional skills, academic conditions, facilitating strategies, organization-oriented structures and extra-organizational structures. Each of these factors as the main theme also included sub-themes. By reviewing the themes, among the main themes obtained, "individual-organizational construction of research" was identified as the central idea and related to other themes. Although individual factors are at the disposal of researchers and they are trying to increase their personal and professional characteristics such as learning skills, performing job duties and increasing scientific literacy in order to conduct research, but until the organizational factors that are in It is not within their scope to facilitate research, one cannot expect scientific and research growth and development.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Faculty members
university
research activity
thematic analysis
Mohaghegh Ardabili University
Akbari, P. (2010). The role and importance of productivity (Vol. 25). https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=fa&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Akbari%2C+P.+%282010%29.+The+role+and+importance+of+productivity.+Political-economic+information.+280%2C+178-195+%5BIn+Persian%5D.&btnG=
Alibeygi, A. (2008). An analysis of the research productivity of faculty members: The case of Razi university. QJ Res. Plann. Higher Educ, 46(no), 125-154. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=8522e8834321d72d06427eefe291b380ba436a0c
Alipoor, F., Romiani, Y., & Yarahmadi, M. (2023). Designing and validating the attraction model of faculty members in Farhangian University with an emphasis on upstream documents: a mixed study. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 29(4), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.irphe.29.4.7
Arab-Rahmatipour, M., Mirhosseini, Z., & Saeedi, A. (2023). Investigating the relationship between knowledge sharing and science production from the viewpoints of faculty members of Knowledge and Information Science at Tehran's public universities. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 27(1), 183-210. https://journal.irphe.ac.ir/article_703024_5b810e55932af3177fb41cfcd5911b28.pdf
Armijos Valdivieso, P., Avolio Alecchi, B., & Arévalo-Avecillas, D. (2022). Factors that influence the individual research output of university professors: The Case of Ecuador, Peru, and Colombia. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 21(4), 450-468. https://doi.org/10.1177/15381927211008684
Barzegar, A. (1994). A look at the concept of scientific policy. Rahyaft, 3. http://ensani.ir/fa/article/141773/%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%87%DB%8C-%D8%A8%D8%B1-%D9%85%D9%81%D9%87%D9%88%D9%85-%D8%B3%DB%8C%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AA-%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%85%DB%8C
Blix, A. G., Cruise, R. J., Mitchell, B. M., & Blix, G. G. (1994). Occupational stress among university teachers. Educational Research, 36(2), 157-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188940360205
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. pearson. https://thuvienso.hoasen.edu.vn/handle/123456789/12789
Dabirian, S., Resvanfar, A., & Asadi, A. (2010). The influence of organizational factors on individual productivity of agricultural extension experts. Asian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2(3), 78-83. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ahmad-Rezvanfar/publication/45266767_The_Influence_of_Organizational_Factors_on_Individual_Productivity_of_Agricultural_Extension_Experts/links/0912f50ebfd5e53c5a000000/The-Influence-of-Organizational-Factors-on-Individual-Productivity-of-Agricultural-Extension-Experts.pdf?_sg%5B0%5D=started_experiment_milestone&origin=journalDetail
Davarpanah, M. R. (2007). Scientometric challenges in the field of humanities compared to other fields Management in education and training. Studies in Education and Psychology, 8(2), 125-146. https://www.sid.ir/paper/440779/fa
Faraji Armaki, A., Arasteh, H., & Ferasatkhah, M. (2012). Developing a Model for Increasing Research Productivity of University Faculty Member: a Case Study of Shahid Beheshti University. Journal of Management and Planning In Educational System, 5(1), 95-117. https://mpes.sbu.ac.ir/article_98371_b88060df6907061d73a99a6c8c5080b2.pdf
Gall, M., Borg, W., & Gall, J. (2016). Quantitative and qualitative research methods in educational sciences and psychology. Translated by Ahmad Reza Nasr, et al, 1398(11), -. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=fa&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Gall%2C+M.%2C+Borg%2C+W.%2C+%26+Gall%2C+J.+%282011%29.+Quantitative+and+qualitative+research+methods+in+educational+sciences+and+psychology.+Vol.+I.+Translated+by+Ahmad+Reza+Nasr+et+al.+Tehran%3A+SAMAT+and+Shahid+Beheshti+University+Publications+%5BIn+Persian%5D.&btnG=
Haidari, G., Farajpahlou, A.H, Asadnia, A. (2013). Analysis research motivational and inhibitor factors among Iranian graduate students of Library and Information Science. Quarterly of Information Science and Codicology, 19(10), 107-124. https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/1116804
Hosseiny Shavoun, A., & Jahed, H. (2012). The Viewpoint of faculty members on research obstacles at Tabriz University. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 4(4), 49-65. https://jstp.nrisp.ac.ir/article_12858_e12731bab08c6e00f1d14b8dcf056299.pdf
Jacob, B. A., & Lefgren, L. (2011). The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity. Journal of Public Economics, 95(9), 1168-1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.05.005
Kabakci, I., & Odabasi, H. F. (2008). The Organization of the Faculty Development Programs for Research Assistants: The Case of Education Faculties in Turkey. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 7(3), 56-63. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1102947
Kamali, Y. (2018). Methodology of Thematic Analysis and its Application in Public Policy Studies. Iranian Journal of Public Policy, 4(2), 189-208. https://doi.org/10.22059/ppolicy.2018.67875
Kinman, G. (1998). Pressure points: A survey into the causes and consequences of occupational stress in UK academic and related staff. Association of University Teachers London. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gail-Kinman/publication/266473393_A_Survey_into_the_Causes_and_Consequences_of_Occupational_Stress_in_UK_Academic_and_Related_Staff/links/551be18a0cf2fe6cbf75f764/A-Survey-into-the-Causes-and-Consequences-of-Occupational-Stress-in-UK-Academic-and-Related-Staff.pdf
Lashkari, N., Salehi, M., & Zamani, F. (2021). Presenting a futures research model to improve the quality of research activities in Islamic Azad universities of Mazandaran province. Quarterly Journal of Medical Sciences Education and Development Center, 12(1), 119-130. https://www.sid.ir/paper/415328/en
Mirsepasi, N., & Afghahi, B. (2012). Comparative analysis of organizational intelligence in higher education: A case study. Journal Of Research and Planning In Higher Education, 18(3), 67-86. https://www.sid.ir/paper/68074/en
Mohseni Nia, M. J. (1999). Budget and planning in education (Vol. 1).
Nguyen, T. L., & Tuamsuk, K. (2021). Faculty–librarian administrative structure and collaborative activities supporting teaching and research at Vietnamese universities: A qualitative study. Ifla Journal, 47(2), 236-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035220944945
Roshani Ali Benasee, H., Hassani, M., & Ghalavandi, H. (2021). Identifying the Dimensions and Components of Research Development for Designing a Conceptual Model (Case Study: Faculty Members of Urmia University). Journal of Management and Planning In Educational System, 14(2), 169-196. https://doi.org/10.52547/mpes.14.2.169
Shafiee, F. S., & Sobhani, H. (2018). Analyzing and explaining the research performance of faculty members with mixed approach and multilevel modeling, case study: University of Tehran. Journal of Educational Planning Studies, 7(13), 97-120. https://eps.journals.umz.ac.ir/article_751_164.htmlhttp:/eps.journals.umz.ac.ir/article_2024.html?lang=en
Shams, A.-H. (2016). Productivity Enhancement Alternatives Among Academic Staff Members. Management and Development Process, 29(2), 71-98. http://jmdp.ir/article-1-2282-en.html
Tahazadeh, M. (2012). Faculty and its position in the university (Vol. 4). https://ensani.ir/fa/article/320844/%D9%87%DB%8C%D8%A6%D8%AA-%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%85%DB%8C-%D9%88-%D8%AC%D8%A7%DB%8C%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%87-%D8%A2%D9%86-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%B4%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%87
Teater, B., Lefevre, M., & McLaughlin, H. (2018). Research activity among UK social work academics. Journal of Social Work, 18(1), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017316652002
Zamani, A., & Pouratashi, M. (2022). Teamwork in faculty members' research activities: Difficulties and solutions. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 28(3), 85-111. https://journal.irphe.ac.ir/jufile?ar_sfile=3883430
 

  • تاریخ دریافت 08 آبان 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 05 بهمن 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 16 بهمن 1402
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 مهر 1403