طراحی و اعتباریابی الگوی ویژگی‏ های اعضای هیأت علمی مرزگستر

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
سعید نوراللهی 1
سیروس قنبری 2
1 دانشجوی دکترای مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران
2 استاد، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران
10.61838/KMAN.IRPHE.30.3.1
چکیده
هدف پژوهش طراحی و اعتباریابی الگوی ویژگی‏ های اعضای هیأت علمی مرزگستر در دانشگاه ‏های دولتی بود. پژوهش با بهره‌گیری از روش ترکیبی متوالی-اکتشافی انجام شد. در بخش کیفی شناسایی ویژگی‏ های اعضای هیأت علمی مرزگستر در دانشگاه ‏های دولتی شهر تهران مدنظر بود. بدین منظور 15 نفر از اعضای هیأت علمی دانشگاه‌های دولتی شهر تهران به‌صورت هدفمند و بر اساس داشتن تجربه مرزگستری انتخاب و مورد مصاحبه قرار گرفتند. مصاحبه‌ها با استفاده از کدگذری باز، محوری و انتخابی تحلیل شدند. با کدگذاری مصاحبه‌ها 48 کد باز، 9 کد محوری شناسایی شده و در سه طبقه قرار گرفتند که نام‌های ویژگی‌های فردی مرزگستر دانشگاهی، ویژگی‌های شغلی مرزگستر دانشگاهی و ویژگی‌های سازمانی مرزگستر دانشگاهی برای این طبقات انتخاب شد. این سه مولفه شکل‌دهنده الگوی ویژگی‏ های اعضای هیأت علمی مرزگستر هستند. در بخش کمی، پژوهش به‏ دنبال اعتباریابی الگوی به ‏دست ‏آمده از بخش کیفی به‏ واسطه طراحی پرسشنامه و پیمایش کمی بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش در این بخش، اعضای هیأت علمی دانشکده‌های فنی-مهندسی دانشگاه‌های دولتی شهر تهران به تعداد 2189 نفر بود که حجم نمونه با استفاده از فرمول کوکران به تعداد 327 نفر تعیین و نمونه‌گیری به روش تصادفی طبقه‌ای- نسبی انجام شد. گردآوری اطلاعات با استفاده از پرسشنامه 19 سوالی محقق‌ساخته (حاصل از تحلیل مصاحبه‌ها در بخش کیفی) انجام شد. داده‌ها با روش‌های تحلیل عاملی تأییدی مرتبه اول و دوم تحلیل شدند. یافته‌ها نشان داد؛ بار عاملی بُعد ویژگی‌های فردی مرزگستر دانشگاهی برابر با 89/0، بار عاملی بُعد ویژگی‌های شغلی مرزگستر دانشگاهی برابر با 73/0، بار عاملی بُعد ویژگی‌های سازمانی مرزگستر دانشگاهی برابر با 85/0 است که با توجه به مقدار تی به‌دست‌آمده در سطح 01/0 معنادار است. شاخص‌های برازش CFI= 0.98، GFI=0.92، AGFI= 90 و RMSEA=0.05 نیز نشان داد ابزار اندازه‌گیری دارای روایی مناسب است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Designing and Validating the Model of the Characteristics of Boundary Spanner Faculty Members

نویسندگان English

Saeid Norollahee 1
Siroos Ghanbari 2
1 Department: Educational Science, Bu -Ali Sina University, Hamedan
2 Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
چکیده English

The aim of the research was to design and validate the model of the characteristics of Boundary Spanner faculty members in state universities. The research was conducted using the sequential-exploratory combined method. In the qualitative part, it was considered to identify the characteristics of Boundary Spanner faculty members in the public universities of Tehran. For this purpose, 15 faculty members of Tehran's public universities were selected and interviewed in a targeted manner and based on their Boundary Spanning experience. The interviews were analyzed using open, central and selective coding. By coding the interviews, 48 open codes and 9 central codes were identified and placed in three classes, and the names of the personal characteristics of the academic boundary spanner, the job characteristics of the academic boundary spanner and the organizational characteristics of the academic boundary spanner were chosen for these classes. In the quantitative part, the research sought to validate the model obtained from the qualitative part by designing a questionnaire and a quan titative survey. The statistical population of the research in this department was 2189 faculty members of technical-engineering faculties of Tehran state universities, and the sample size was determined using Cochran's formula to the number of 327 people and sampling was done by stratified-proportional random method. Data collection was done using a researcher-made 19-question questionnaire (resulting from the analysis of interviews in the qualitative section). The data were analyzed by confirmatory factor analysis methods. The findings showed; The factor loading of the dimension of personal characteristics of the academic boundary spanner is equal to 0.89, the factor loading of the dimension of the job characteristics of the academic boundary spanner is equal to 0.73, the factor loading of the dimension of the organizational characteristics of the academic boundary spanner is equal to 0.85, which according to the t value obtained at the level of 0.1 0 is significant. The fit indices of CFI=0.98, GFI=0.92, AGFI=90 and RMSEA=0.05 also showed that the measurement tool has good validity.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

boundary spanner
boundary spanning
faculty members
characteristics of faculty members
Christopherson, E. G., Howell, E. L., Scheufele, D. A., Viswanath, K., & West, N. P. (2021). How science philanthropy can build equity. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 19(4), 48-55. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=fa&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=1.%09Christopherson%2C+E.+G.%2C+Howell%2C+E.+L.%2C+Scheufele%2C+D.+A.%2C+Viswanath%2C+K.%2C+%26+West%2C+N.+P.+%282021%29.+How+science+philanthropy+can+build+equity.+Stanford+Social+Innovation+Review%2C+19+%284%29%3A+48%E2%80%9355.&btnG=#d=gs_cit&t=1721029918989&u=%2Fscholar%3Fq%3Dinfo%3A_W-rah26H2QJ%3Ascholar.google.com%2F%26output%3Dcite%26scirp%3D0%26hl%3Dfa
Curnin, S. (2018). Organizational Boundary Spanning. Global Encyclopedia of Public Adminnstration, public policy, and Government.
Eshtehardi, M., & Ali, S. (2022). Structural-interpretative modeling of strategies for achieving the mission of education in an entrepreneurial and community-oriented university. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 28(2), 33-64. https://doi.org/10.52547/irphe.28.2.33
Esmaeili, M., Yamani Doozi Sorkhabi, M., Haji Hosseini, H., & Kiamanesh, A. (2023). A Survey on Relationship between Engineering Colleges of Tehran’s Public Universities and Industry, within the Framework of National Innovation System. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 17(1), 27-46. https://journal.irphe.ac.ir/article_702746_0f17a7b407adc6481372d809e8242997.pdf
Ghoraishi Khorasgani, M. s., & Nazarzadeh Zare, M. (2021). A Look at the Challenges of Boundary-Spanner Academic Leaders [Research]. Iranian Higher Education, 13(2), 72-95. http://ihej.ir/article-1-1658-en.html
Hatch, M., Parrish, J., Heppell, S., Augustine, S., Campbell, L., Divine, L., Donatuto, J., Groesbeck, A., & Smith, N. (2023). Boundary spanners: a critical role for enduring collaborations between Indigenous communities and mainstream scientists. Ecology and Society, 28(1), -. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13887-280141
Hill, L. B. (2016). Advancing undergraduate STEM reform through multi-institutional networks: The role of formal boundary spanners. Michigan State University. https://www.proquest.com/openview/1c648a7ea356313a9b4fdb028e0a0938/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
Ho, J., Kang, T., & Shaari, I. (2021). Leading from the middle: vice-principals in Singapore as boundary spanners. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(2), 145-161. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JEA-05-2020-0123/full/html
Keszey, T. (2018). Boundary spanners’ knowledge sharing for innovation success in turbulent times. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(5), 1061-1081. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2017-0033
Kousgaard, M. B., Joensen, A. S. K., & Thorsen, T. (2015). The challenges of boundary spanners in supporting inter-organizational collaboration in primary care – a qualitative study of general practitioners in a new role. BMC Family Practice, 16(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0231-z
Messenger, H., & Bloisi, W. (2020). Experience, skill and competence: boundary spanning capabilities for leadership and management of transnational education. In Leadership Strategies for Promoting Social Responsibility in Higher Education (pp. 141-160). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S2055-364120200000024013/full/html
Nair, U. K., & Tandon, A. (2015). Boundary Objects and End User Engagement: Illustrations from the Social Enterprise Domain. In S. Sahadev, K. Purani, & N. Malhotra (Eds.), Boundary Spanning Elements and the Marketing Function in Organizations: Concepts and Empirical Studies (pp. 137-159). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13440-6_9
Nazarzadeh Zare, M., & Ghoraishi Khorasgani, M. S. (2022). Boundary-spanning leadership as a necessity for academic administrators. International Journal of Educational Management, 36(4), 527-540. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJEM-09-2021-0384/full/html
Oonk, C., Gulikers, J. T. M., den Brok, P. J., Wesselink, R., Beers, P.-J., & Mulder, M. (2020). Teachers as brokers: adding a university-society perspective to higher education teacher competence profiles. Higher Education, 80(4), 701-718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00510-9
Papadimitriou, A. (2020). Beyond rhetoric: reinventing the public mission of higher education. Tertiary Education and Management, 26(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-019-09046-9
Prysor, D., & Henley, A. (2018). Boundary spanning in higher education leadership: identifying boundaries and practices in a British university. Studies in Higher Education, 43(12), 2210-2225. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1318364
Purcell, J. W., Pearl, A., & Van Schyndel, T. (2020). Boundary spanning leadership among community-engaged faculty: An exploratory study of faculty participating in higher education community engagement. Engaged Scholar Journal, 6(2), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.15402/esj.v6i2.69398
Rubens, A., Spigarelli, F., Cavicchi, A., & Rinaldi, C. (2017). Universities’ third mission and the entrepreneurial university and the challenges they bring to higher education institutions. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 11(03), 354-372. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-01-2017-0006
Sahadev, S., Purani, K., & Malhotra, N. (2015). Managing Boundary Spanning Elements: An Introduction. In S. Sahadev, K. Purani, & N. Malhotra (Eds.), Boundary Spanning Elements and the Marketing Function in Organizations: Concepts and Empirical Studies (pp. 1-8). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13440-6_1
Satheesh, S. A., van Meerkerk, I., Verweij, S., Busscher, T., & Arts, J. (2024). Enabling boundary spanners in public–private collaboration: The impact of support and role autonomy on reducing role stress. Public Administration, 102(2), 405-424. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12927
Seoin, Y. (2018). Boundary Spanning Leadership and Creative Performance: Exploring Psychological Mechanisms and Boundary Conditions Seoul National University Graduate School]. https://s-space.snu.ac.kr/handle/10371/141259
Van Meerkerk, I., Edelenbos, J. (2018). Facilitating conditions for boundary-spanning behavior in governance networks. Public Management Review, 20(4), 503-524. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017. 1302248
Weerts, D. J., & Sandmann, L. R. (2010). Community Engagement and Boundary-Spanning Roles at Research Universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(6), 632-657. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2010.11779075
Williams, P. (2002). The Competent Boundary Spanner. Public Administration, 80(1), 103-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00296
Williams, P. (2010). Special agents: The nature and role of boundary spanners.
Williams, P. (2012). Collaboration in public policy and practice: Perspectives on boundary spanners. Policy Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=fa&lr=&id=JjNQaWLjj58C&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=25.%09Williams+P.+(2012).+Collaboration+in+public+policy+and+practice:+Perspectives+on+boundary+spanners.+Bristol:+The+Policy+Press.&ots=ZHQTw-d_Yj&sig=nMlCyHsieYMD9MAUUMs7vDa6G1w#v=onepage&q=25.%09Williams%20P.%20(2012).%20Collaboration%20in%20public%20policy%20and%20practice%3A%20Perspectives%20on%20boundary%20spanners.%20Bristol%3A%20The%20Policy%20Press.&f=false
Zhang, C., Wu, F., & Henke, J. W. (2015). Leveraging boundary spanning capabilities to encourage supplier investment: A comparative study. Industrial Marketing Management, 49(no), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.04.012

  • تاریخ دریافت 17 تیر 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 20 دی 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 12 تیر 1403
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 مهر 1403