طراحی و اندازه‌گیری شاخص ترکیبی سرمایه انسانی از نوع آموزش

نویسندگان
شهرام مصلی 1
علیرضا امینی 2
غلامرضا گرایی نژاد 3
علی اکبر خسروی نژاد 4
1 دانشجوی دوره دکتری اقتصاد واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی
2 دانشیار گروه اقتصاد واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی
3 استادیار گروه اقتصاد واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی
4 . استادیار گروه اقتصاد واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی
10.52547/irphe.28.2.1
چکیده
نبود شاخصی جامع برای اندازه ­گیری تغییرات سرمایه انسانی در ابعاد مختلف کمیت و کیفیت آموزش در کشور موجب شده است تا برنامه­ ریزان و سیاستگذاران آموزشی با کمبود اطلاعات برای برنامه ­ریزی آموزش کشور مواجه باشند. در این پژوهش با الهام گرفتن از الگوی ساخت شاخص ­های ترکیبی منتشر شده توسط سازمان همکاری اقتصادی و توسعه و نیز مشورت با پانزده نفر از استادان متخصص دانشگاهی در حوزه سرمایه انسانی و با اتکا به مبانی نظری و طراحی پرسشنامه ­ای با مقیاس لیکرت و پس از آزمون آلفای کرونباخ به­ منظور ارزیابی پایایی پژوهش، شاخص ­های تشکیل­ دهنده سرمایه انسانی از نوع آموزش در دو حوزه کمیت و کیفیت وزن ­دهی شدند. با استفاده از داده­ های آماری موجود 18 شاخص­ مرتبط با کمیت و کیفیت سرمایه انسانی از نوع آموزش برای دوره 1396-1389 انتخاب و سپس داده ­ها نرمال شدند و با استفاده از تحلیل تصمیم ­گیری چند معیاره و روش سوارا وزن­ دهی و به روش حسابی تجمیع شدند. در انتها، نتایج اندازه ­گیری شاخص جامع سرمایه انسانی از نوع آموزش به تفکیک کمیت و کیفیت ارائه شده است که قابلیت بررسی علل افزایش و کاهش آن در قالب شاخص ­های تشکیل­ دهنده کمیت و کیفیت وجود دارد. نتایج به ­دست آمده نشان داد که کیفیت سرمایه انسانی متناسب با کمیت آن رشد نداشته و حتی در برخی از سال­ ها با کاهش نیز مواجه بوده است که بیانگر کم ­توجهی دولت به ارتقای کیفیت آموزش در کشور است.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Designing and measuring the composite human capital index of education type

نویسندگان English

Shahram Mosalla 1
Alireza Amini 2
Gholamreza Geraei Nejad 3
Ali Akbar Khosravi Nejad 4
1 Student of Economics, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate professor, Department of Economics, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant professor, Department of Economics, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
4 Assistant professor, Department of Economics, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

The lack of a comprehensive index to measure the changes in human capital in various dimensions of the quantity and quality of education in the country has caused educational planners and policy makers to face a lack of information for planning the country's education.  This research was inspired by the model of making composite indicators published by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD, 2008) and consulting with fifteen academic  professors in the field of human capital. Based on the theoretical foundations, a Likert scale questionnaire was designed. After performing Cronbach's alpha test to evaluate the reliability of the research, the composite indicators of human capital of education type were weighed in two contexts of quantity and quality. Using the available statistical data, 18 indicators related to the quantity and quality of human capital of the education type for the period 2010-2017 were selected. The data were normalized and weighted using multiple criteria decision analysis and SWARA method and were aggregated by arithmetic method. Finally, the results of measuring the comprehensive index of human capital in the form of education by quantity and quality are presented which has the ability to investigate the causes of its increase and decrease, in the form of indicators of quantity and quality. The results showed that the quality of human capital has not grown in proportion to its quantity and has even decreased in some years, which indicates the government's lack of attention to improving the quality of education in the country.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

composite index
education
quantity and quality of human capital
Iran
1. Azariadis, C., & Drazen, A. (1990). Threshold externalities in economic development. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105(2), 501-526.
2. Bandura, R.A. (2008). Survey of composite indices measuring country performance. 2008 Update. Studies Working Paper 2008-02, United Nations Development Programme, Office of Development.
3. Barro, R.J. (1998). Notes on growh accounting. NBER Working paper, No. 6654.
4. Becker, G.S. (1962). Investment in human capital: A teoretical analisis. Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), Part 2.
5. Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
6. Education at a Glance (2019). OECD Indicators2, https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/education-at-a-glance-2019_f8d7880d-en.
7. Farasatkhah, M. (2008). A study of conditions for qualitative and quantitative promotion of accessibility to higher education in Iran. Institute for Research and Planning in Higher Education, Vol. 1, No. 2 [in Persian].
8. Farhang, M. (1990). Culture of economic sciences. Eighth edition. Tehran: Peykan Publications [in Persian].
9. Fereidouni, S., & Rouhani, Sh. (2019). Higher education expansion policy in Iran and its impact on educational justice. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 25(2), 1-21[in Persian].
10. Fereidouni, S. (2017). Higher education expansion with emphasis on social impact: a grounded theory approach. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 23(4), 69-96 [in Persian].
11. Funtowicz, S.O., Munda, G., & Paruccini, M. (1990). The aggregation of environmental data using multicriteria methods. Environmetrics, 1(4), 353-36.
12. Gu, W., & Wong, A. (2010). Estimates of human capital in Canada: The lifetime income approach. Economic Analysis Research Paper Series 11F0027M No.062, Economic Analysis Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa.
13. Kersuliene, V., Zavadskas, E., & Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11 (2), 243-258.
14. Le, T., Gibson, J., & Oxley, L. (2005). Measures of human capital: A review of the literature. New Zealand: Treasury,Working Paper 05/10.
15. Little, R.J.A., & Rubin, D.B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data. Wiley Interscience, J. Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.
16. Little, D., & Rubin, D. (1991). Statistical analysis with missing data. Journal of Educational Statistics, 16(2) 150-155 (6 pages).
17. Mankiw, N.G., Romer, D., & Weil, D.N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economoc growh. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 35(41), 407-437.
18. Nabian, A. (2014). Presenting new MCDM framework based on SWARA-VIKOR in personnel selection. Applied Mathematics in Engineering, Management and Technology, 2(1), 28-36.
19. Naderi, A. (2015). Advanced issues in the economics of education. University of Tehran Publishing Institute [in Persian].
20. Nardo, M., Paisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffman, A., & Giovannini, E. (2005). Handbook on constructing composite indicators. Methodology and user Guide. OECD Statistics Working Paper 2005/3,OECD Statistics Directorate.
21. Nilsson, R. (2003). OECD system of leading indicators: Practices and tool, OECD statistics directorate. Paper presented at OECD/ESCAP Workshop on Composite Leading Indicators and Business Tendency Surveys, Bangkok, 24 - 26 February.
22. OECD (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators methodology and user guide.
23. Rezaei, M., & Yaghoubi, P. (2014). The share of high-tech exports (Hi-Tech) in the Iranian economy. Office of Energy and Mining Energy Studies [in Persian].
24. Saisana, M., Tarantola, S., & Saltelli, A. (2005). Uncertainty and sensitivity techniques as tools for the analysis and validation of composite indicators. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 168(2), 307-323.
25. Salehi, M.J. (2005). Calculation of private human capital return in Iran. Institute for Research and Planning in Higher Education, No. 35-36 [in Persian].
26. Salehi, M.J. ( 2015). Presenting a model for measurement of human capital monetary value and its estimation in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 21(1), 21-28 [in Persian].
27. Tarantola, S., Jesinghaus, J., & Puolamaa, M. (2000). Global sensitivity analysis: A quality assurance tool in environmental policy modeling. In Saltelli A., Chan K., Scott M. (eds.). Sensitivity analysis. pp. 385-397. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
28. Todaro, M. (1998). Economic development in the third world. Tehran: Program and Budget Organization Publications [in Persian].
29. Trinh, L., & Gibson, J. (2003). Cost- and income-based measuresof human capital. Department of Economics, New Zealand: University of Waikato.
30. United Nations Economic Commission For Europe (2016). Guide on measuring human capital. United Nations New York and Geneva.
31. World Bank Group (2018). The human capital project.
32. World Economic Forum (2017-2018). The global competitiveness index.

  • تاریخ دریافت 15 اسفند 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری 16 خرداد 1402
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 خرداد 1401