تبیین شاخص‌های دانشگاه نسل سوم و بررسی دستیابی نظام آموزش عالی به آنها؛ مورد: دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان

نویسندگان
زهره میرزایی 1
اصغر سلطانی 2
حسین مطهری نژاد 3
1 کارشناسی ارشد برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان
2 دانشیار گروه علوم تربیتی دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان
3 استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان
چکیده
از جمله زمینه‌های توسعه در آموزش عالی حرکت به سمت بهره‌مندی از نظام‌های دانشگاهی با ویژگی‌های نسل سوم است. بر این اساس، هدف پژوهش حاضر تبیین شاخص‌های دانشگاه نسل سوم و بررسی میزان دستیابی دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان به این شاخص‌ها از دیدگاه مدیران دانشگاه و اعضای هیئت علمی بود. پژوهش حاضر از نوع پژوهش‌های کیفی، از نظر شیوه جمع‌آوری داده‌ها توصیفی و طرح آن نیز پیمایشی (زمینه‌یابی) با روش مصاحبه بود. جامعه آماری شامل همه اعضای هیئت علمی و مدیران دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان (629 نفر) بود که 15 نفر با روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها از روش مقوله‌بندی استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که پنج شاخص اصلی دانشگاه نسل سوم شامل مهارت‌آموزی، کارآفرینی، استقلال همه‌جانبه، تعامل دانشگاه با جامعه و خلاقیت و ایده‌پردازی است. همچنین دانشگاه برای دستیابی به این شاخص‌ها نیازمند توجه به زمینه ­سازی برای نهادینه ‌شدن تفکر کارآفرینی، استقلال سیاسی و اقتصادی دانشگاه، ارتباط دانشگاه با صنعت و جامعه، حمایت از شرکت‌های دانش ­بنیان و افزایش فرصت‌های مطالعاتی و  به‌روزرسانی است. نتایج  نشان داد که هیچ­ کدام از ویژگی‌های دانشگاه نسل سوم به ­صورت کامل در دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان وجود ندارد و این دانشگاه هنوز در نسل اول (آموزش‌محور) یا در مرحله گذار به نسل دوم دانشگاهی (پژوهش‌محور) قرار دارد و در برخی از شاخص‌ها از جمله ویژگی دانشگاه وابسته به شبکه(نت) و تحقیقات فرارشته‌ای و میان‌رشته‌ای تا حدودی در حال نزدیک شدن به دانشگاه نسل سوم و در سایر شاخص‌ها از جمله استقلال، بهره‌برداری از دانش و بین‌المللی بودن ضعیف است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Explaining the characteristics of the third generation university and examining their achievement in Iranian higher education: Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman case

نویسندگان English

Zohreh Mirzaie 1
Asghar Soltani 2
Hossein Motaharinezhad 3
1 M.A. in Educational Planning, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
2 Associate professor, Department of Education, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Education, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
چکیده English

One of the areas of development in higher education is the move towards benefiting from the third-generation university systems. Accordingly, the main purpose of this study was to explain the characteristics of a third generation university and to examine their achievement from point of view of administrators and faculty members at Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman. The current study was a qualitative and descriptive survey research design.  The population was comprised all administrators and faculty members at Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman (N=629). Fifteen individuals were selected through purposive sampling method for interviews. The categorizing method was used for data analysis. Results showed that from interviewees’ point of views, the five main characteristics of the third generation university included skill training, entrepreneurship, inclusive autonomy, interaction between university and the society, and creativity and idea production. The founding also indicated that the university should consider characteristics such as establishment of entrepreneurial thinking, political and economic autonomy, cooperation with industry and society, supporting knowledge based enterprises and increasing academic sabbatical, and updating activities. Results showed that none of the characteristics of a third generation university is fully integrated in Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman and it could be said that this university is still in the first generation (knowledge-based) or at the transition to the second-generation university (research-based). However, in some of the characteristics, including the attribute of the university-based network and interdisciplinary and interdisciplinary research is somewhat closer to the third-generation university and it is weak in other characteristics such as autonomy, utilization of knowledge and internationalization.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Third Generation University
Entrepreneurship University
Internationalization
University autonomy
Iranian higher education
References
1. Altbach, P.G., & Knight, J. (2006). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. The NEA 2006 Almanac of Higher Education. NEA, Washington.
2. Asgharzadeh, N., & Khorasani, A. (2018). A proper model for the language of instruction in Iran’s universities in the event of internationalization: Grounded Theory. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 23(4), 45-68 (in Persian).
3. Bennett, N., Dunne, E., & Carré, C. (2000). Skills development in higher education and employment. Taylor & Francis, Inc., 7625 Empire Dr., Florence, KY 41042.
4. Cillo, V., Caggiano, V., & D'Emilia, C. (2015). Wellbeing and entrepreneurial university. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 2, 129-136.
5. Clark, B.R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation (Issues in higher education). New York: Elsevier.
6. Desk of Future Studies in Iranian Higher Education (2018). The future of social impact of university in Iran, Panel N. 23. Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, Institute for Research and Planning in Higher Education (IRPHE) (in Persian).
7. Enayati, T., & Aalipour, A. (2014). Suggesting a model for the academic humanities spin off incubators, move to the fourth generation university. Journal of Science and Technology Parks and Incubators, 10(39), 20-28 (in Persian).
8. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: The invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research policy, 32(1), 109-121.
9. Farasatkhah, M. (2017). Occasionality of university in Iran: Some new and critical debates on university studies, science research and higher education. Tehran: Agah (in Persian).
10. Farasatkhah, M. (2018). University and higher education: Global perspectives and Iranian issues. Tehran: Nashreney (in Persian).
11. Farasatkhah, M. (2013). Conceptual framework for futurity oriented university planning. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 19(3), 1-21 (in Persian).
12. Farasatkheh, M. (2010). A survey of interactions between higher education and other systems of production and services. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 16(3), 45-64 (in Persian).
13. Finn, A., Ratcliffe, J., & Lorcan, S. (2007). University futures: The direction, shape and provision of higher education in the University of the Future. Dublin Institute of Technology.
14. Forouzanfar, M.H., Mahmoudabadi, M., & Ziaie Adib, S.M. (2018). The realization of the third generation university: The new challenge for entrepreneurship (Case study: Educational, technical and vocational centers of Kerman province). 3th International Conference on Management and Etrepreneuership, Tehran.
15. Gall, M.D., Gall, J.P., & Borg, W.R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th Ed.). (A. R. Nasr et al., Trans.). Tehran: SAMT Publications (in Persian).
16. Gibb, A.A. & Hannon, P. (2006). Towards the entrepreneurial university? International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 4, 73-110.
17. Habibi Rezaei, M., & Siahmansouri, Y. (2012). The realization of third generation universities through the development of academic centers. Journal of Nasha Elm, 3(1), 43-49 (in Persian).
18. Hoseinzadeh, F., Firozie, H., & Siahposhtkhachki, A. (2018). Towards the third generation of medical universities. The Journal of Medical Education and Development, 12 (4), 239-245 (in Persian).
19. Kanter, R.M. (1983). The change masters. NY City: Simon & Schuster.
20. Khoinejad, G. (2001). Research methods in educational sciences. Tehran: Samt Publications (in Persian).
21. Khorsandi Taskooh, A., & Panahi, M. (2016). Critical analysis of international university ranking; Policy recommendations for Iran's higher education. Journal of Iranian Higher Education, 8(3), 111-136 (in Persian).
22. Knight, J., & de Wit, H. (2018). Internationalization of higher education: Past and future. International Higher Education, 95, 2-4.
23. Kordnaeij, A., Ahmad, P., Ghorbani, Z., & Niakan Lahiji, N. (2012). Examination the characteristics of the third generation university in Tarbiat Modares University. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 5(3), 47-64 (in Persian).
24. Makki Aal Agha, B. (2007). The role of university in enterprenership development. New Thoughts in Educational Sciences, 2(4), 115-127 (in Persian).
25. Mehdi, R. (2015). The status of skill training in third generation universities. Quarterly Journal of Skill Trainin, 14, 103-117 (in Persian).
26. Mian, S.A. (2006, December). Can entrepreneurial university model help Pakistan leapfrog into the knowledge economy? Some reflections. In Proceedings of First International Conference on Assessing Quality in Higher Education, Lahore, December (pp. 11-13).
27. Moore, R. (2004). Education and society: Issues and explanations in the sociology of education. Cambridge: Polity Press.
28. OECD (2004). Education in a new international setting: Curriculum development for internationalization-guidelines for country case study. Paris: OECD (CERI).
29. Pawlowski, K. (2009). The 'Fourth Generation University' as a creator of the local and regional development. Higher Education in Europe, 34 (1), 51-64.
30. Rahmani Miandehi, G., & Nasrabadi Lavasani, Z. (2001). University independence in future. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 7(2), 65-102 (in Persian).
31. Safarzadeh, H., Ahmadi Sharif, M., & Kargarian Marvdasti, G. (2009). Journal of Technology of Education, 4(2), 137-151 (in Persian).
32. Sani, P., & Gharibpour, M. (2012). Management in third generation universities: Entrepreneur University. Third International Conference in Applied Research in Management and Accounting, Thran: Shahid Beheshti University (in Persian).
33. Sarmad, Z., Bazargan, A., & Hejazi, E. (2016). Research methods in behaviroal sciences. Tehran: Agah Publications (in Persian).
34. Sayyari, S., & Gharamaleki, A. (2010). Interdisciplinary studies: Foundations and approaches. Journal of Islamic Philosopghy and Theology, 43(2), 59-82 (in Persian).
35. Shahverdiani, S. (2010). Examining the effect of environmental factors on creation and development of incubators centers for universities: A new approach on entrepreneurial university and the relationship between industry and university. Journal of Industry and University, 2(7, 8), 45-56 (in Persian).
36. Sperrer, M., Müller, C., & Soos, J. (2016). The concept of the entrepreneurial university applied to universities of technology in Austria: Already reality or a vision of the future? Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(10), 37-44.
37. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Wissema, J. (2010). Leading the third generation university: Towards a comprehensive management theory of the 3GU. Wissenschaftsmanagement, 5, 42-46.
39. Wissema, J.G. (2009). Towards the third generation university: Managing the university in transition. USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
40. Zuti, B., & Lukovics, M. (2017). 'Fourth Generation' universities and regional development. San Francisco, California. Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3022721.

  • تاریخ دریافت 15 اسفند 1401
  • تاریخ انتشار 15 اسفند 1401