فصلنامه پژوهش و برنامه ریزی در آموزش عالی
موقعیت‌های رویارویی جنسیتی در دانشگاه و مصایب آن
نویسندگان
1 استادیار پژوهشکده مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی
2 دکترای سیاستگذاری فرهنگی، پژوهشکده مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی
3 کارشناس ارشد برنامه‌ریزی رفاه اجتماعی
چکیده
موقعیت‌های رویارویی جنسیتی در روابط روزمرۀ دانشگاهی مسائل و مصایبی را ایجاد می کند که شایسته بررسی است. در این میان، مسئلۀ چگونگی رویارویی جنسیتی استادان مرد با دانشجویان زن در کشور ایران و پیامدهای غیرعلمی آن اهمیت بسیار زیادی دارد. در پژوهش حاضر مصایب جنسیتی دانشجویان زن در زمینه روابط موجود در دانشگاه ایرانی بررسی شد. تمرکز این پژوهش بر مناسبات و زیست دانشگاهی بود که طی آن، مضمون ویژگی‌های رویارویی جنسیتی استادان مرد با دانشجویان زن، از نظر بروز و ورود به موقعیت‌های غیرعلمی، طبقه‌بندی و تحلیل شد. برای این منظور، با رویکرد مطالعات فرهنگی و به کارگیری روش کیفی، 146 مصاحبۀ عمقی با دانشجویان زن 10 دانشگاه تحلیل مضمون شد. پرسش‌های این مصاحبه‌ها ناظر بر پرسش از «حفظ حریم» در موقعیت‌هایی است که طی آن مناسبات علمی دانشجویی در روابط استادان مرد با دانشجویان زن به مناسبات غیرعلمی تحریف می‌یابند. یافته‌ها نشان داد که اصل حفظ حریم ارتباط جنسیتی در فرهنگ ایرانی وقتی توسط استادان مرد با قوت زیادی اجرا یا دچار گسست می‌شود، سه‌‌گانۀ خشونت، تبعیض و بهره‌کشی جنسیتی پدید می‌آید که برآیند آنها روی‌همرفته مصایب جنسیتی را برای دانشجویان زن به بار می‌آورد. یافته‌های این پژوهش می‌تواند در سطوح نظریه‌پردازی درخصوص کارکرد دانشگاه، سیاستگذاری دانشگاهی و در سطح اخلاق دانشگاهی نقش مؤثری داشته باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
The gender encountering situations in the university and their miseries
نویسندگان [English]
- Nassereddinali Taghavian 1
- Hamed Taherikia 2
- Maryam Poormirghaffari 3
1 Institute for Social and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran
2 . PhD in Cultural Policy Making, Institute for Social and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran
3 MA in Social Welfare Planning, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
This article is about studying girl students’ gender miseries in the Iranian university. The population of the university is the only mixed sex population in an official and governmental space in which the population is highly by cultural circulation and variations. Due to this fact, the gender encountering happens a lot through the everyday relations of the university. The gender encountering of the girl students with the male professors contains a crucial importance that has been remained silent at other inquiries; however there is some information of sexual exploitation, harassment and discrimination about girl students by male professors. This article mainly concerns about a type of gender encountering, in Iranian university community, which has not been studied before. For this reason, we analyzed 10 universities and conducted in-depth interview with 146 girl students. As the result, our findings demonstrate that the principle of regarding the gender privacy, based on the Iranian culture, by male professors, when it is performed so strictly or it is ruptured then it produces the triadic consequences of gender “harassment”, “discrimination” and “exploitation”. Thus, the inevitable result of these factors is the occurrence of gender misery for girl students.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Gender misery
- University
- Girl student
- Harassment
- Exploitation
- Discrimination
2. Afary, J. (2009). Sexual politics in modern Iran. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Barak, A., Pitterman, Y., & Yitzjaki, R. (1995). An empirical test of the role of power differential in originating sexual harassment. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(4), 497- 517.
4. Bell, M.E., Dolly, J.P., & Terry, H. (1979). Common factors in sex and race discrimination. Psychological Reports, 44, 831-834.
5. Biehl, J., & Locke, P. (2010). Deleuze and the anthropology of becoming. Current Anthropology, 51(3), 317-351.
6. Bondestam, F. (2004). Signing up for the status Quo? Semiological analyses of sexual harassment in higher education: A Swedish Example. Higher Education in Europe, XXIX (1).
7. Bounds, D., Delaney, K.R., Julion, W., & Breitenstein, S. (2017). Uncovering indicators of commercial sexual exploitation. Interpersonal Violence, 00(0): 1-17.
8. Cantalupo, N. Ch., & Kidder, W.C. (2017). A systematic look at a serial problem: Sexual harassment of students by university faculty. Utah Law Review, Forthcoming. Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2971447.
9. Edgar, A., & Sedjwick, P. (2008). Cultural theory: The key concepts. London: Routledge.
10. Faraji, M., & Hamidi, N. (2016). Iranian women’s veiling and hejab. Tehran: Islamic Development Organization (in Persian).
11. Farley, L. (1978). Sexual shakedown: The sexual harassment of women on the job. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12. Flanders, D.P., & Anderson, P.E. (1973). Sex discrimination in employment theory and practice. ILR Review, 26(3), 938-955.
13. Grossman, H., & Grossman, S. (1994). Gender issues in education. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
14. Higate, P. (2007). Peacekeepers, masculinities, and sexual exploitation. Men and Masculinities, 10(1), 99-119.
15. Izadi Jeiran, A. (2017). Violence and suffering in student life: An antropological inquiry into Iranian Universities. Unpublished Research Report in Persian. Tehran: Institute for Social and Cultural Studies.
16. Jones, S.S., Boocock, K., & Underhill-Sem, Y. (2013). Accessing information about sexual harassment in New Zealand’s universities. Women’s Studies Journal, 27(1), 36-48.
17. Joubert, P. (2009). Sexual harassment of academic staff at higher education institutions in South Africa. (PhD Thesis). South Africa: NWU.
18. Joubert, P., Van Wyk, Ch., & Rothmann, S. (2011). The incidence of sexual harassment at higher education institutions in South Africa: Perceptions of academic staff. Acta Academica, 43(1), 167-188.
19. Keshavarz, K.) 2018(. Problem seeking of female students at Iranian Universities. Tehran: Institute for Social and Cultural Studies (in Persian).
20. Lee, K., Gizzarone, M., & Ashton, M.C. (2003). Personality and the likelihood to sexually harass. Sex Roles, 49(1-2), 59-69.
21. Luzon, G. (2017). Criminalising sexual harassment. Criminal Law, 81(5), 359-366.
22. Mac Kinnon, C.A. (1979). Sexual harassment of working women: A case of sex discrimination. Yale University Press.
23. Michel, A. (1989). Non-aux stereotypes. Vaincere le sexism dans les livers pour entants ET les manuets scolaires. Unesco, France.
24. Najmabadi, A. (2005). Women with mustaches and men without meards: Gender and sexual anxieties of Iranian modernity. Berkely: University of California Press, Pages 377.
25. O’sullivan, S. (2010). Cultural studies as rhizome - rhizomes in cultural studies. Cultural Studies, 20, 81-93.
26. Office for Counseling and Health, Student Affairs Devision, Ministry of Science, Research and Tecknology (2015(. The Features of Student Life: A National Survey. Unpublished Research Report in Persian.
27. Oyewunmi, A. (2013). The promotion of sexual equality and non-discrimination in the workplace: A Nigerian perspective. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 13(4), 324-347.
28. Paidar, P. (1995). Women and the political process in twentieth-century Iran. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Papoli Yazdi, L., & Dezhamkhooee, M. (2018). The archeology of sexual policies. Tehran: Nashre Negahe Moaser (in Persian).
30. Pina, A., Gannon, T.A., & Saunders, B. (2009). An overview of the literature on sexual harassment: Perpetrator, theory, and treatment issues. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14, 126-138.
31. Puigvert, L., Christou, M., & Holford, J. (2012). Critical communicative methodology: Including vulnerable voices in research through dialogue. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42(4), 513-526.
32. Sadeghi, F. (2013). Sexuality, nationalism and modernity in Iran. Tehran: Ghasidehsara (in Persian).
33. Shumba, A., & Matina, A.E.M. (2002). Sexual harassment of college students by lecturers in Zimbabwe. Sex Education, 2(1).
34. Stagoll, C. )2010(. Concepts, in Adrian Parr Edit: The Deleuze Dictionar (53-4). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
35. Sulaiman, A. (2015). Exploring the pattern of sexual harassment in Lagos State higher institutions: A structural model. Pendidikan Malaysia, 40(1), 13-19.
36. Taghavian, N.A. (2016). The interpretation of the experience of oppression: A narrative of female students’ insecurity in Iranian universities. Unpublished Research Report in Persian, Tehran: Institute for Social and Cultural Studies.
37. Taghavian, N.A. (2017). The role of the sexuality in the structure of academic action: Female students and the phenomenon of sexual security. Unpublished Research Report in Persian, Tehran: Institute for Social and Cultural Studies.
38. Taherikia, H. (2017). The cultural life of Iranian university professors. Unpublished research report in Persian, Tehran: Institute for Social and Cultural Studies.
39. Taiwo, M.O, Omole, O.C, & Omole, O.E. (2014). Sexual harassment and psychological consequence among students in higher education institution in Osun State, Nigeria. International Journal of Applied Psychology, 4(1), 13-18.
40. Tayefi, A. (2017). Sociological analisys of the female students’ narratives of sexual harassment by university professors in Iran. Telegram Channel: https://telegram.me/alitayef. (in Persian).
41. UNICEF. )2017(. Life Skills and Citizenship Education (LSCE) Analytical Mapping in the Middle East and North Africa.
42. Whaley, G.L., & Tucker, S.H. (1998). A theoretical integration of sexual harassment model. Equal Opportunities International, 17(1), 21- 29.
43. Zimmer, T.A. (1975). Sexism in higher education: A cross-national analysis. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 55-67.
)