نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری رشته برنامه‌ریزی درسی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی
2 دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی
چکیده
مشارکت در تدوین برنامه درسی و ارتقای فرهنگ برنامه ریزی درسی به ارتقای کارآمدی و اثربخشی برنامه درسی کمک می کند. با وجود این، به نظر می رسد متولیان آموزش عالی درک و باور درستی از فرهنگ برنامه ریزی درسی در دانشگاهها ندارند. هدف این پژوهش تدوین الگوی مفهومی ارتقای فرهنگ برنامه ریزی درسی آموزش عالی بود. این پژوهش از نوع پژوهشهای کیفی بود و با استفاده از رویکرد مبتنی بر داده انجام شد . جامعه آماری کلیه متخصصان در حوزه سیاستگذاری یا دارای سوابق اجرایی در آموزش عالی و متخصصان برنامه درسی آموزش عالی بودند. در پژوهش حاضر با استفاده از طرح کیفی و نمونه گیری هدفمند، مصاحبه عمیق با 29 نفر از متخصصان و صاحبنظران حوزه آموزش عالی صورت گرفت. به منظور تعیین روایی داده‌های کیفی از روش چک کردن اعضا استفاده شد. یافته ها نشان داد که مقوله محوری مطالعه حاضر ارتقای الگوی فرهنگ برنامه ریزی درسی آموزش عالی بود که در سه بعد دانش برنامه ریزی درسی، دغدغه برای برنامه ریزی درسی و عمل به برنامه ریزی درسی تحلیل و با توجه به شرایط علّی، شرایط زمینه ای و شرایط میانجی راهبردهایی تدوین و مدل نهایی بر اساس آن ارائه شد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Developing a model for promotion of curriculum design culture in Iran's higher education based on grounded theory approach
نویسندگان [English]
- Hosein Mohsenpour Kebriyaei 1
- Kourosh Fathi Vajargah 2
- Mahboobeh Arefi 2
- Abasalt Khorasani 2
1 Ph.D. Student of Schedule of Curriculum of Shahid Beheshti University
2 Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University
چکیده [English]
Engagement in curriculum design process and promotion of curriculum design culture contribute to curriculum efficiency and effectiveness. However, it seems that the higher education authorities do not have a clear understanding of the role of curriculum design at universities. This research aimed to define and propose a conceptual framework for the promotion of curriculum design culture in universities and institutions of higher education. This research was a qualitative research type that was conducted using the grounded theory approach. The research population consisted of all curriculum experts, curriculum planners, and policy-makers of the higher education system of Iran. Using qualitative research design and selective sampling, in-depth interviews were conducted with 29 higher education authorities and experts. To establish the validity of the qualitative data, the method of participants checking was deployed. The results of the research indicated that the promotion of curriculum design culture in higher education system acts as the core category, which itself made of three dimensions, namely knowledge of curriculum design, concern for curriculum design and execution of curriculum programs. The development strategies and a final model were proposed based on causal conditions, core phenomena and context conditions.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Higher Education
- Curriculum design culture in higher education
- grounded theory
2. Alipour, N., & AliPour, L. (2016). Multicultural and ethnic education in curriculum. Quarterly Journal of Psychology and Educational Sciences, (11), 167-182 (in Persian).
3. Analoui, F. (1995). Management skills and senior. International Journal of PublicSector Management, (3)8, 68-52.
4. Arasteh, H. (2003). The role of higher education in Iran prospect 2026. Rahyaft Journal, 3, 33-42 (in Persian).
5. Azubuike, O.C., & Charity Oguzor, U. (2013). Consideration of culture in the development of homeeconomics curriculum in Nigeria. Journal of Educational and Social Research MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy, 3(9), 183-188.
6. Belting, P.E. & Belting, N.B. (2011). The modern high school curriculum. Cosmo Publication, NewDelhi- India.
7. Berge, Z.L. (2003). Barriers to online teaching in post-secondary institutions: Can policy changes fix it?. Available at http://www. westga. edu/~distance/Berge 12 .html, 1998 Retrieved October192003.
8. Bjarnason, S., Cheng Ming, K., & Fielden, L. (2009). A new dynamic: Private high education. UNISCO, World Conference on High Education 2009, Printed in France.
9. Briggs, C.L. (2007). Curriculum collaboration: A key to continuous program renewal. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(6), 676-711.
10. Carter, J.T., Draugalis, J.R., Bruce, S.P., & Gonyeau, M.R. (2011). The role of curriculum committees in pharmacy education. Am J. Pharm Educ, 75(8), 154.
11. Chantal, J., Gervedink, Jules, M., Pieters & Joke, M.V. (2013). Influence of culture on curriculum development in Ghana: An undervalued factor?. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(2), 225-250.
12. Cleqq, S.R., Kornberger, M., & Pitsis, T. (2005). Managing & organizations: An introduction to theory & practice book. Sydney.
13. Creswell, J. (2015). Quality quality and research design. translated by Danayeifard, H., and Kazemi, H., Second Edition, Tehran: Saffar Publishing (in Persian).
14. Darling-Hammond, L. (2005). Teaching as a profession: lessons in teacher preparation and professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(3), 237-240.
15. Dewett, T., Whittier, N.C., & Williams, S.D. (2007). Internal diffusion: The conceptualizing innovation implementation. Competitiveness Review, 17(1-2), 8-25.
16. Fathi Vajargah, K., & Momeni Mahmoie, H. (2008). Investigating the role of factors affecting the participation of faculty members in the academic planning. Iranian Higher Education, 1 (1), 139-165 (in Persian).
17. Philsoophian, M., & Akhavan, P. (2017). The effect of knowledge sharing behavior on organizational performance (Case Study: Iranian Space Agency). Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 32(3), 713-730(in Persian).
18. Foley, A., & Yildirim, N. (2011). The relationship between game design and instructional design. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 15(2).
19. Fred, R.D., Meredith, E.D., & Forest, R.D. (2010). What are business schools doing for business today?. Business Horizons, 54(1), 51-62.
20. Gaff, J.G. (1975). Toward faculty renewal: Advances in faculty, instructional, an organizational development. San Francisco, CA: Josse-Bass.
21. Gao, Y., Zhang, P.P., Wen, S.F., & Chen, Y.G. (2017). Challenge, opportunity and development: Influencing factors andtendencies of curriculum innovation on undergraduate nursing education in the mainland of China. Chinese Nursing Research, 4, 113-116.
22. Gervedink Nijhuis, C.J., Voogt, J.M., & Pieters, J.M. (2012). The cultural complexity of international collaboration: Conditions for sustainable curriculum development in Ghana. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36, 647- 658.
23. Hacker, M., & Rowe, J. (2007). The impact of a national curriculum development on teaching and learning behaviors. International Journal of Science Education, 19(9), 112-123.
24. Helton, S.P. (2000) Factors that influnce higher education faculty involvement in curriculum and insruction. In Partial fullfillment of The reguirements for the degree doctor of philosophy. University of Virginia.
25. Hrebiniak, L.G., & Joyce, W.F. (1985). Organizational adaptation: Strategic choice and environmental determinism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(3), 336-349.
26. James, C.H. (2011), Where were the auditors? Using AAERs in introductory or advanced auditing courses. Journal of Accounting Education, 28(2), 114-127.
27. Khazaee, T., Hedayati, H., Mogharab, M., & Madarshahian, F. (2010). Assessment of nursing and midwifery faculty members' teaching skills from the members and student's viewpoints. Modern Care Journal, 7(1-2, 43-48 (in Persian).
28. Khosravi, M., Fathi Vajargah, K., Maleki, H., & Norouzi, D. (2013). An analysis of acceptance of curriculum innovations in the higher education system: A case study of the Iranian university curriculum revision. Quaterly Educational Psychology, 9(27), 135-166 (in Persian).
29. Lattuca, L.R., & Stark, J.S. (2009). Shaping the college curriculum: Academic plans in context. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Second Edition, San Francisco.
30. Li, D., & Edwards, V. (2013). The impact of overseas training on curriculum innovation and change in English language education in Western China. Language Teaching Research, 17(4), 390- 408.
31. Li, Y., Wei, F., Ren, S., & Di, Y. (2015). Locus of control, psychological empowerment andintrinsic motivation relation to performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30, 422-438.
32. Mahmud, S., & Bretag, T. (2013). Postgraduate research students and academic integrity: ‘It's about good research training’. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35 (4), 432-43.
33. Mahdiyon, R., Zavar, T., Ghasemzadeh, A., Nawazik, F., & Shakeri SiahKamari, Sh. (2016). The role of information and communication technology skills in educational and research performance of faculty members. Quartery Journal of Educational Measureent and Evaluation Studies, 6(13), 133-156 (in Persian).
34. Marsh, C.J. & Willis, G. (2007). Curriculum: Alternative approaches. Ongoing Issues. Pearson Education, Inc. 4th Ed. USA.
35. Mazzoli, J.A. (2000). Faculty perceptions of influnce on the curriculum in higher Education. Submitted in partial Fullfilment of reguirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy. University of South Carolina.
36. Mehrmohammadi, M. (2002). Curriculum: Viewpoints, views and attitudes. Mashhad: Astan Quds Razavi Publishing (in Persian).
37. Mesmer-Magnus, J., & DeChurch, L. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 535-546.
38. Nakpodia, E.D. (2010). Culture and curriculum development in Nigerian schools. African Journal of History and Culture (AJHC), 2 (1), 001-009.
39. Nitenson, S. (2005). Adoption and implementation of radical innovation. (Dissertation doctoral). Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements of philosophy in the graduate school of the Golden GAte University.
40. Offorma, Ch.G. (2016). Integrating components of culture in curriculum planning. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 8(1), 1-8.
41. O’Neill, G. (2010). Initiating curriculum revision: Exploring the practices of educational developers. International Journal for Academic Development.
42. Ryder, J., Banner, I., & Homer, M. (2014). Teachers’ experiences of science curriculum reform. SSR March 95(352).
43. Saidi, F.E. (2005). It developing a curriculum model for the education of architects within the needs of a changing South Africa. University of Pretoria etd.
44. Saketi, P. (2002). New challenges of academic planning, roundtable on challenges of higher education in Iran. Shahid Beheshti University Press, Tehran (in Persian).
45. Sharifian, F., Mirshah Jafari, S.E., Sharif, S.M., & Mosapour, N. (2013). The viewpoints of curriculum and graduate students on how students participate in curriculum development. New Approaches to Education, 8(17), 47-88 (in Persian).
46. Sharifian, F., Mirshah Jafari, S.E., Sharif, S.M., & Mosapour, N. (2014). Investigating the present status of the participation of managers and employers in higher education curriculum. Educational Planning Studies, 3(6), 83-113(in Persian).
47. Shawer, S.F. (2017). Teacher-driven curriculum development at the classroom level: Implications for curriculum, pedagogy and teacher training. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 296-313.
48. Sheton, C.K., & Darling, J.R. (2002). The quantum skills model in management: A new paradigm to enhance effective leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, (6)22, 273-264.
49. Short, E. (1999). Methodology of curriculum studies. Translated by Mehrmohammadi, M. et al., Tehran: Research Institute for Education Studies and Samt (in Persian).
50. Silva, E.G. & Teixeira, A.A.C. (2008). Surveying structural change: Seminal contributions and a bibliometric account. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 19, 273-300.
51. Stark, J. (1997). Program level curriculum planning. Journal Research in Higher Education, 38(1).
52. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2008). Basics of qualitative research. Translated by Mohammadi, B., Tehran: Human Science & Cultural Studies Center Publication (in Persian).
53. Tseng, Y.F., & Lee, T.Z. (2009). Comparing appropriate decision support of human resource practices on organizational performance with DEA/AHP model. Expert Systems with Applications. 36(3, 2), 6548-58.
54. Wolf, P. (2007). Curriculum development in higher education: Faculty-driven processes and practices. Jossey-Bass.
)