فصلنامه پژوهش و برنامه ریزی در آموزش عالی
بررسی رابطه بین سبکهای تفکر و میزان خلاقیت با قابلیتهای کارآفرینی دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی در دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان
نویسندگان
1 گروه روانشناسی دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان
2 دانشجوی دکترای رشته روانشناسی تربیتی دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان
چکیده
هدف این پژوهش بررسی رابطه بین سبکهای تفکر و میزان خلاقیت با قابلیتهای کارآفرینی دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان بود. روش تحقیق توصیفی از نوع همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری کلیه دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان بودند که به روش نمونهگیری طبقهای تعداد 150 نفر بهعنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. برای جمعآوری اطلاعات مربوط به سبکهای تفکر از پرسشنامه استاندارد استرنبرگ، برای سنجش خلاقیت از پرسشنامه محقق ساخته 37 سؤالی و برای سنجش قابلیتهای کارآفرینی از پرسشنامه محقق ساخته 39 سؤالی استفاده شد. دادهها با استفاده از آزمون رگرسیون چندگانه از طریق نرم افزار آماری spss21 تحلیل شدند. نتایج در سطح معناداری P<0/05 نشان داد که سبکهای تفکر مولد میتوانند پیشبینی کننده میزان خلاقیت و قابلیتهای کارآفرینی دانشجویان باشند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Investigating the relationship between thinking styles and creativity with entrepreneurial capabilities in graduate students at Bu-Ali Sina University
نویسندگان [English]
- Abolghasem Yaghoobi 1
- Azam Mirzasafi 2
1 Department of Psychology, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan
2 Doctoral student of Psychology, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan
چکیده [English]
This study was conducted to evaluate the relationship between thinking styles and level of creativity with entrepreneurial capabilities of Bu-Ali Sina University graduate students. The research method was descriptive- correlational. The statistical population included all Bu-Ali Sina University graduate students. Using, stratified random sampling, 150 individuals were selected. To collect information related to thinking styles, Sternberg's standard questionnaire was used. A researcher-made questionnaire with 37 questions to measure creativity, and a 39 item researcher-made questionnaire to measure entrepreneurial ability were utilized. Data were analyzed using multiple regression test through SPSS21. Results indicated that (P < /em> <0/05) productive thinking styles can predict the creativity and entrepreneurial capabilities of students.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- creativity
- Entrepreneurship
- Simple thinking style
- Generative thinking style
- Iran
2. Boroumand Nasab, M. (2002). A review of the simple and multiple relationships between creativity, the motivation of progress and self-esteem with entrepreneurship in students at Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. (Ph. D thesis). Department of Education and Psychology (in Persian).
3. Burch, J. (1986). Profiling the entrepreneur. Business Horizons, 13-16.
4. Ching, Y.S., & Chann, L. (2012). The relationship among creative, critical thinking and thinking style in Taiwan ltinght School Students. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31.
5. Drucker, P. (1985), Innovation and entrepreneurship. NY: Harper Collins Publisher.
6. Emamipour, S., & Seif, A.A. (2009). A study on the development of thinking styles in students and their relationship with creativity and academic Achievement. Quarterly of Educational Innovations, 25(21), 30-35 (in Persian).
7. Grigorenko, E.L., & Sternberg, R.J. (2010). Styles of thinking. abilities and academic performance. Exceptional Children.
8. Hezarjaribi, J. (2011). The study of the entrepreneurship of graduates of the humanities in the fields of social and cultural publications in Tehran. (Ph.D. thesis). Department of Literature and Humanities, Isfahan University (in Persian).
9. Javaheri, F. (2013). Obstacles to women's entrepreneurship: The impact of gender inequality on women's entrepreneurship in Iran. Journal of Sociology of Iran, 5(2), 13-23 (in Persian).
10. Keras, K. (2010). From Sternberg, a new take on what makes kids Tufts - worthy. Tufts Daily, November.
11. Kuratko, D., & Montagno, R. (1989). The entrepreneurial spirit. Training and Development Journal. 43 (10), 83-87.
12. Lumbe, J. (2012). Thinking styles and accessing information on the world wide web. Bangor, University College of North Wales.
13. Moghimi, S.M. (2004). Creativity in civil society institutions. Tehran: Tehran University Press (in Persian).
14. Postigo, S. (2012). Entrepreneurship education in Argentina: The case of Sananders University. In Proceedings of the Conference Entitled, The Internationalizing in Entrepreneurship Education and Training, Malyasia.
15. Samad Aghaei, J. (2004) Creativity: Essence of entrepreneurship. Tehran: University of Tehran. Tehran University Entrepreneurship Center (in Persian).
16. Shaver, K.G., Willams, S.I., & Scott, L.R. (2009). Entrepreneurial beliefs. Creativity and risk-taking: Personality or situation. Unpublished Manuscript, College of William and Mary.
17. Shokri, O., Kadivar, P., Farzad, V., & Daneshvarpour, V. (2008). The relationship between thinking styles and learning approaches with students' academic achievement. Quarterly Journal of New Cognitive Science, 30(2), 35-48 (in Persian).
18. Sternberg, R. J., & Lobart, R.K. (2005) Thinking styles inventory. Yale University Unpublished Test.
19. Sternberg, R.J. (2003). A three facet model of creativity in R.J. Sternberg (ED). The Nature of Creativity Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Zhang. L.F. (2014). Thinking styles and big five personality traits revisited. Journal Elsevier Personality and Individual Difference, 40.
)