فصلنامه پژوهش و برنامه ریزی در آموزش عالی
آناتومی مفهوم «دانش آموخته»: تحلیل کیفی برداشت و تجارب دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی و اعضای هیئت علمی
نویسندگان
1 گروه علوم تربیتی دانشگاه کردستان
2 کارشناس ارشد، مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه کردستان
چکیده
هدف این پژوهش آگاهی از برداشت و تجارب اعضای هیئت علمی و دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی از مفهوم دانشآموخته دانشگاهی بود که با رویکردی تفسیری و کیفی و با راهبرد پدیدارنگاری انجام شد. میدان تحقیق دانشگاه کردستان بود. مشارکت کنندگان 42 نفر (25 نفر از اعضای هیئت علمی تمام وقت و 17 نفر از دانشجویان دوره تحصیلات تکمیلی) بودند. نمونهگیری با روش هدفمند و با حداکثر تنوع انجام شد. برای جمعآوری دادهها از یک منشور مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته استفاده شد که تا رسیدن به اشباع نظری ادامه یافت. دادهها با استفاده از کدگذاری نظری تحلیل شدند که شش مقوله توصیف درخصوص مفهوم دانشآموخته با عناوین محصول دانشگاه، سفیر دانشگاه، یادگیرنده مادام‌العمر، کاریاب پراسترس، کنشگر اجتماعی و کاربر دانش در شغل بهدست آمد. دانشجویان بیشتر از اعضای هیئت علمی به مقولات محصول دانشگاه، کاریاب پراسترس و کنشگر اجتماعی تأکید داشتند. اعضای هیئت علمی بیشتر بر مقولات یادگیرنده مادام‌العمر، کاربر دانش در شغل و سفیر دانشگاه تأکید داشتند. بیشترین احساس ناخوشایند از دانش‌آموختگی به دانشجویان و بیشترین حس خوشایند از دانش‌آموختگی به اعضای هیئت علمی مربوط میشد. مفهوم دانشآموخته از دیدگاه زنان در مقایسه با مردان بهدلیل مسائلی مانند ازدواج و نگهداری از فرزندان متفاوت بود. در زمینه برداشتهای متفاوت از مفهوم دانشآموخته به نظر می‌رسد که تنوع نظریهها و برداشتهای سیاسی و اجتماعی تصوراتی را بهوجود می‌آورد که موجب میشود تعریفها، اندازهگیریها و یافتهها یکدست و یکپارچه نباشند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
The concept of alumnus anatomy: a qualitative analysis of faculty membersâ and graduate students' perceptions and experiences
نویسندگان [English]
- Naser Shirbagi 1
- Nematollah Azizi 1
- Shabnam Bahrami 2
1 Department of Education, Kurdistan University
2 Master student in Educational Administration, Kurdistan University
چکیده [English]
members and graduate students about the concept of university graduates. A qualitative and interpretive approach was applied with a phenomenographic strategy. The research field was University of Kurdistan. Participants included 42 individuals (25 full-time faculty members and 17 graduate students). Purposeful sampling with maximum diversity was conducted. A semi-structured interview charter was used to collect data, which continued until theoretical saturation. The data were analyzed based on theoretical coding. At the end, six descriptive categories about the concept of a graduate were obtained as follows: university product, university ambassador, lifelong learner, stressful jobseeker, social activist, and knowledge user in the job. Students emphasized the categories of university product, stressful jobseeker and social activist more than the faculty members. Lifelong learner, knowledge user in the job, and university ambassador categories were mostly emphasized by faculty members. The most unpleasant feeling about graduation was related to students, as well as the most pleasant feeling of graduation was related to faculty members; The concept of graduate was perceived differently by women, in comparison to men, due to some issues such as marriage and child care. In regard to different perceptions of the concept of graduate, it appears that the variety of theories, and political and social perceptions give rise to ideas that make the definitions, measurements and findings unmatched and incongruous.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- faculty members
- students
- graduates
- phenomenography
- employment
2. Arianpour, A., & Arianpour, M. (1984). English to farsi dictionary. Tehran: Amir Kabir Publishing (in Persian).
3. Azri & Petrus Communication (2005, October). Alumni relationship management in Europe EAIE Conference, Krakow. Retrived Octobr 26, 2015 from http://www.petruscommunications.com/resources/ /INTASurvey.pdf.
4. Bab Cock, P. (1986). Webster's third new international dictionary of the english language. (2nded.), London: Pergamon.
5. Brew, A. (2001). Conceptions of research: A phenomenographic study. Studies in Higher Education 26, 271-285.
6. Cabrera, A.F., Weerts, D.J., & Zulick, B.J. (2005). Making an impact with Alumni surveys. New Directions for Institutional Research, 126, 5-17.
7. Chicago University (2008, October). Report of the joint task force on alumni relations. Retrived Octobr 17, 2015 from www.uchicagoabg.org/images.htmlfile.
8. Danayeefard, H., & Kazemi, S. (2010). Improvement of interpretative research in the organization: A review of the philosophical foundations and the process of the implementation of the phenomenological method. Quarterly Journal of Improvement Management Studies, (61), 121-147 (in Persian).
9. Dunkin, R. (2000). Using phenomenography to sudy organizational change. In J. A. Bawden & E. Walsh (eds). Phenomenography, (137-152) Melbourne: RIMIT University Press.
10. Fazeli, E. (2000). Job-student relationship students in the field of psychology. Tehran: Institute for Research and Planning in Higher Education (in Persian).
11. Flick, A. (2006). Intrucucation to qualitative research. Translation by H. Jalili, Tehran: Publishing Ney.
12. Gall, M.D., Gall, J.P., & Borg, W.R. (2006). Educational research: An introduction. (8th ed.), Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
13. Grant, D.L. (1999). Intellectual life of alumni. The Journal of Higher Education, 70, 533-541.
14. Hanson, S. (2000). Alumni characteristics that predict promoting and donating to alma mater: Implications for Alumni relations. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Department of Educational Foundations and Research, University of North Dakota.
15. Järvinen, P. (2004). On research methods. Tampere, Finland: Opinpajan Kirja.
16. Kellogg, K. (1996). An analysis of the collaborative programming between student affairs and Alumni relations professionals at select post-secondary institutions in missouri. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Graduate School, University of Missouri Columbia.
17. Konzak, E., & Teague, D. (2009). Reconnect with your Alumni and Connect Donors. Thecnical Service Quarterly, 26(3), 217-225.
18. Midgen, J. (1987). Alumni survey of entry goals, satisfaction, and job benefits associated degree. Community Junior College Research Quarterly of Research and Practice, 11(3), 179-188, DOI: 10.1080/0361697870110305.
19. Mirkamali, M. (1994). An analysis of job capabilities among the universities graduates. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, (4), 13-38.
20. Mitchell, E., Zaitseva, E., & Clifford, E. (2008, December). Valuing the voice of past students: A dual perspective, Society for Research into Higher Education, Annual Conference 2008, 9-11 December, Liverpool, UK.
21. Mohammadpour, A. (2011). Method of qualitative research (steps and practical procedures in qualitative methodology). Vol. 2. Tehran: Publications of Sociologists (in Persian).
22. Penelope, M., Andreas, F., & Lars-Owe, D. (2013). A phenomenographic study of students' conceptions of quality in learning in higher education in Rwanda longitudinal study of their stability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 321-325.
23. Polit, D.F., & Hungler., B.P. (2013). Essentials of nursing research: Methods, appraisal, and utilization. (8 th ed.), Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
24. Polson, J. (2003). Adult graduate students challenge institutions to change. New Direction for Student Services, (102), 59-68(in Persian).
25. Rakhsh, M., Farajzadeh, Z., Isadpanah, A., & Saadatjoo, S. (2012). The study of factors affecting the quality of education from the viewpoint of nursing graduates working in hospitals in Birjand, New Care, 11 (3), 196-202.
26. Rust, A.A., & Vys, C.S. (2014). The importance of a university identity for students and alumni: The case of the cape Peninsula University of Technology South Africa. J. Soc. Sci., 40(1), 20-40.
27. Saunders, G.S., & De Graff, E. (2012). Assessment of curriculum quality through alumni research. Europian Journal of Engineering Education, 37(2), 133-142.
28. Seviance Technology (2011, Octobr). Bridging gaps through strongeralumni relations. Retrived Octobr 27, 2015 from http://efytimes.com/e1/69632/Press-Release/Bridging-Gaps-Through-Stronger-Alumni-Relations.
29. Singer, T.S., & Hughey, W.A. (2002). The role of alumni association in student life. New Direction for Student Services. No.100, Wiley Predicals. Inc. 51-68.
30. Techler, U. (1999). Higher education policy and thr word of work: Changing conditions and challenges. Higher Education Policy, 12, 285-312.
31. The University of British Columbia (UCB) Alumni Citation (2010). What is alumni engagement? Alumni Report, 1-13.
)