تأثیر سرمایه روانشناختی بر تسهیم دانش با میانجی احساس امنیت روانشناختی؛ مورد: دانشگاه صنعتی شریف

نویسندگان

1 استادیار دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی

2 کارشناس ارشد رشته مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه الزهرا (س)

3 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد رشته مدیریت دولتی گرایش منابع انسانی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی

چکیده

در این مطالعه تأثیر سرمایه روانشناختی بر تسهیم دانش با میانجیگری احساس امنیت روانشناختی بررسی شد. روش پژوهش توصیفی از نوع پیمایشی بود. جامعه آماری کلیه کارکنان غیر هیئت علمی دانشگاه صنعتی شریف به تعداد 584 نفر بودند که نمونه‌ای به حجم 234 نفر انتخاب شد. به­منظور گردآوری داده‌ها از سه پرسشنامه سرمایه روانشناختی لوتانز و همکاران، احساس امنیت روانشناختی ادمونسون و رفتار تسهیم دانش هوف و ریدر استفاده شد. روایی پرسشنامه‌ها با استفاده از روایی محتوا تأیید و پایایی آن با استفاده از آلفای کرونباخ محاسبه شد که به ترتیب 78/0، 71/0 و80/0 بود. نتایج تحقیق نشان داد که متغیر سرمایه روانشناختی بر احساس امنیت روانشناختی و تسهیم دانش تأثیر معنادار دارد. همچنین احساس امنیت روانشناختی بر تسهیم دانش تأثیر معنادار دارد. نتایج حاکی از تأثیر سرمایه روانشناختی بر تسهیم دانش با میانجی احساس امنیت روانشناختی بود. الگوی تجربی به‌دست‌آمده از تحلیل داده‌ها تا حد زیادی منطبق با مدل مفهومی پژوهش بود. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The impact of psychological capital on knowledge sharing with mediating role of psychological safety: Sharif University of Technology Case

نویسندگان [English]

  • Davood Hosseinpoor 1
  • , Maryam Armandi 2
  • Reza Valadi 3

1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allame Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran

2 Master of Educational Administration, Alzhra University

3 Master student in Public Management (HRM), Allame Tabatabaei University

چکیده [English]

The impact of psychological capital on knowledge sharing and the mediating role of  percieved pschological safety is investigated in this study. The research method was a descriptive survey.  The population included non-faculty employees of Sharif University of Technology. A sample of   234 individuals were selected. In order to collect data, three questionnaires were used, including Psychological Capital of Luthans et al.(2007), Percieved Psychological Safety of Edmondson(1999) and Knowledge Sharing of Hooff and Ridder(2004). Questionnaires validity was confirmed by using content validity and their reliability was calculated 0.78, 0.71 and 0.80 respectively using Cronbach's alpha. The results showed that psychological capital had a positive and significant impact on percieved psychological safety and knowledge sharing. In addition, the significant impact of psychological safety on knowledge sharing was confirmed. The results also indicated that percieved psychological safety mediates the impact of psychological capital on knowledge sharing. The Empirical model extracted from data analysis is largely consistent with the conceptual model. 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Psychological capital
  • Knowledge sharing
  • percieved psychological safety
  • Sharif University of Technology
  • Tehran
1. Afrooz, G. A. (1997). Sense of safety. Journal of Peyvand, 231, 3-4 (in Persian).
2. Aghaz, A., & Negintaji, F. (2012). Organizational trust: A key factor in actual knowledge sharing. Journal of Iran Management Sciences, 7 (28), 67-86 (in Persian).
3. Ardalan, M., Ghanbari, S., Zandi, KH., & Seif Panahi, H. (2012). Modeling the relationship between psychological empowerment, workplace spirituality and sense of psychological safety among nurses. Journal of Nursing Management, 2(2), 69-79(in Persian).
4. Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation & barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 64-77.
5. Avey, J. B., Patera, J. L., & West, B. J. (2006). The implications of positive psychological capital on employee absenteeism. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13(2), 41-60.
6. Bergheim, K., Eid, J., Hystad, S. W., Birkeland Nielsen, M., Mearns, K., Larsson, G., & Luthans, B. (2013).The role of psychological capital in perception of safety climate among air traffic controllers. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20(2), 232- 241.
7. Bitmis, M.G., & Ergeneli, A. (2013). The role of psychological capital and trust in individual performance and job satisfaction relationshi: A test of multiple mediation model. 9th International Strategic Management Conference. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, 173 -179.
8. Davari, A., & Rezazadeh, A. (2013). Structral equation modeling with PLS. Jahad Daneshahi Publications, 2ed edition, Tehran (in Persian).
9. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Journal of Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383.
10. Ghahremani, M., Abolghasemi, M., Arefi, M., & Khatami, M. (2011). Evaluating organizational well-being of Shahihid Beheshti University Faculties. Journal of Job and Organizational Consulting, 4(10), 13-30(in Persian).
11. Harandi, A. (2013). Explaining the role of social capital and knowledge transfer in organizational learning in knowledge-based companies. Journal of Technology Development Management, 1(4), 161-182(in Persian).
12. Henttonen, K., Kianto, A., & Ritala, P. (2016). Knowledge sharing and individual work performance: An empirical study of a public sector organization. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(4).
13. Hodges, T. D .(2010). An experimental study of the impact of psychological capital on performance, engagement, and the contagion Effect. (PHD thesis). Faculty of Graduate College. University of Nebraska.
14. Hooff, B. V., & Ridder, J. A. (2004). Knowledge sharing in context: The influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on Knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6), 117-130.
15. Kessel, M., Kratzer, J., & Schultz, C. (2012). Psychological safety, knowledge sharing, and creative performance in healthcare Teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21 (2), 147-157.
16. Kruzich, J. M., Mienko, J. A., & Courtney, M. E. (2014). Individual and work group influences on turnover intention among public child welfare workers: The effects of work group psychological safety. Children and Youth Services Review, 42, 20-27.
17. Lin, H., Lee, H. SH., & Wang, W. D. (2009). Evaluation of factors influencing knowledge sharing based on a fuzzy AHP approach. Journal of Information Science, 35, 25- 44.
18. Luthans, F., Vogelgesang, G. R., & Lester, P. B. (2006). Developing the psychological capital of resiliency. Human Resource Development Review, 5(1), 25-44.
19. Maharati, Y., Kazemi, M., & Hassani Tavabe, A. (2013). Investigating the mediating role of knowledge management in the relationship between environmental uncertainty and organizational innovation. Journal of Change Management, 6(12), 91-112 (in Persian).
20. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396.
21. Matzler, K., Renzl, B., Muller, J., Herting, S., & Mooradian, T. A. (2008). Personality traits and knowledge sharing. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 301-313.
22. McManus, P. (2016). Examining the factors to knowledge sharing within an organizational context. Irish Academy of Management, doctoral colloquium, Dublin.
23. Mc Manus, P., Ragab, M., Arisha, A., & Mulhall, S. (2016). Review of factors influencing employees’ willingness to share knowledge. 18th European Conference on Knowledge Management (ECKM), Belfast, Northern Ireland, 2016.
24. Mohsenin, SH., & Esfidani, M. R. (2013). Structural equation based on partial least squares approach by means of PLS. Ketabe Mehraban Publications, 1st edition, Tehran (in Persian).
25. Newman, A., Schwarz, S., & Borgia, D. (2013). How does microfinance enhance entrepreneurial outcomes in emerging economies? The mediating mechanisms of psychological and social capital. International Small Business Journal, 32(2), 158-179.
26. Oldenkamp, J.H. (2001). Succesvol overdragen van kennis (Successful Knowledge Transfer). Lemma BV,Utrecht.
27. Oliveira, M., Curado, C., Maçada, A., & Nodari, F. (2015). Using alternative scales to measure knowledge sharing behaviour: Are there any differences? Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 132-140.
28. Paulin, D., & Suneson, K. (2012). Knowledge transfer, knowledge sharing and knowledge Barriers: Three blurry terms in KM. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(1), 81-91.
29. Peterson, S. J., Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Zhang, Z. (2011). Psychological capital and employee performance: A latent growth modeling approach. Personnel Psychology, 64, 427-450.
30. Qiu, X.W., Yan, X.C., & Lv, Y.L. (2015) The effect of psychological capital and knowledge sharing on innovation performance for professional technical employees. Journal of Service Science and Management, 8, 545-551.
31. Rehman, M., Mahmood, B. A. K., Salleh, R., & Amin, A. (2011). Review of factors affecting knowledge sharing behavior. International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics in Hong Kong, 3.
32. Schepers, J., Jong, A.D., Wetzels, M., & Ruyter, K.D. (2008). Psychological safety and social support in groupware adoption: A multi-level assessment in education. Computers & Education, 51, 757-775.
33. Tucker, A. L., Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2007). Implementing new practices: An empirical study of organizational learning in hospital intensive care units. Management Science, 53(6), 894-907.
34. Walumbwa, F. O., Peterson, S. J., Avolio, B. J., & Hartnell, Ch. A. (2010). An investigation of the relationships among leader and follower psychological capital, service climate, and job performance. Personnel Psychology, 63, 937-963.
35. Wang, SH., & Noe, R. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resources Management Review, 20,115-131.
36. Weggeman, M. (2000). Kennismanagement: De paraktijk (Knowledge Management: Practice), Scriptum Management, Schiedam.
37. Zhang, Y., Fang, Y., Wei, K. K., & Chen, H. (2010). Exploring the role of psychological safety in promoting the intention to continue sharing knowledge in virtual communities. International Journal of Information Management, 30, 425-436.
38. Zohar, D. (2010). Thirty years of safety climate research: Reflections and future directions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42, 1517-1522.