نویسندگان
1 دکترای رشته آموزش عالی برنامه ریزی توسعه، دانشگاه مازندران
2 استاد گروه علوم انسانی و اجتماعی دانشگاه مازندران
چکیده
هدف پژوهش حاضر تبیین دوره دکتری پژوهشمحور در چشمانداز سناریوهای بین‌المللیسازی علم و فناوری بود. این پژوهش با رویکرد کیفی از طریق مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته با 37 نفر از مطلعان کلیدی شامل دانشجویان و دانشآموختگان در رشتههای علوم انسانی- اجتماعی و علوم و مهندسی، استاد راهنمای پروژه دکتری پژوهشمحور، مجریان و خبرگان وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری در حیطه سیاستگذاری و کارشناسی انجام شد. از آنجا که بیشترین جذب دوره دکتری پژوهشمحور در مؤسسات پژوهشی بوده است، نمونه مورد نظر از پژوهشگاههای وابسته به وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری انتخاب شدند. نتایج بهدست آمده نشان داد که انگیزه شکلگیری دوره مبتنی بر نظریه حداکثرسازی سود، موجب شکلگیری نظام منفعت طلبی شده است که بدون در نظر گرفتن منافع ملی، بر اساس منافع افراد، گروهها، نهادها و احزاب سیاسی در جهت سیطره کمیتگرایی آموزشعالی شکل گرفته است. غلبه این انگیزه‌ها در نظام منفعت، به ضعف نظام آموزشی-پژوهشی و اختلال ادراکی دانشجویان منجر شده است. بر اساس سناریوهای پیش رو در چارچوب ماتریس سناریوهای علم و فناوری در کشور، وضعیت کنونی درونگرایی متمرکز است که در این پژوهش با توجه به بین‌المللی شدن دوره دکتری پژوهشمحور و ورود به شبکه باز جهانی پیشنهادهایی ارائه شد تا علاوه بر توسعه ظرفیتهای زیرساختی و افزایش توانمندی پژوهشی و یادگیری، کیفیت دورههای دکتری پژوهش محور و محصولات آن نیز ارتقا یابد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Explaining research-based doctoral program in perspective of internationalization of science and technology scenarios
نویسندگان [English]
- Maryam Baradaran Haqir 1
- Ebrahim Salehi Omran 2
1 Phd. in Development Planning in Higher Education, Mazandaran University
2 Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Mazandaran University
چکیده [English]
This study aimed to explain the research-based doctoral program in perspective of internationalization of science and technology scenarios. This qualitative research was conducted through semi-structured interviews with 37 key informants including students and alumnus of human and social sciences and engineering, doctoral research-oriented supervisors, executives and experts from the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology in the area of policymakers. Since most recruitment of doctoral research-oriented programs is in research institutions, the sample of the research was selected from institutions affiliated to the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. The result indicated that the motivation behind developing the program is formed based on the interests of individuals, groups, institutions and political parties in order to dominate quantity-oriented higher education. Overcoming these incentives in the benefit system led to the weakness of teaching and research system and students' perception disorder. Based on the current scenarios, within the matrix scenarios of science and technology in the country, the present situation is more focused introvert. Considering the internationalization of research-based doctoral programs and entry to the global open network, the recommendations were proposed to develop infrastructure and increase research and learning capacity, quality of research-based doctoral programs and its products..
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Research-based doctoral
- Internationalization
- Self-interest system
- The utility maximization theory
2. Abdolvahabi, M., Romiani, U., & Zarif, S. (2014). Examining students’ basic skill significant difference in the era of globalization: Shahid Chamran University case. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 19 (4), 51-74 (in Persian).
3. Ahmadi, A. (2013). Interview in the University Portal. 17 November 2013 (in Persian).
4. Alladin, I. (1992). International cooperation in higher education: The globalization of universities. Higher Education in Europe, 17 (4).
5. Altbach, P.G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. A Report Prepared for the UNESCO 2009 World Conference on Higher Education, Published with support from SIDA/SAREC.
6. Amin Mozaffari, F., & Yousefi Aghdam, R. (2009). Academic socialization of students in the University of Tabriz. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 2(3), 17-32 (in Persian).
7. Bernstein, B., Evans, B., Fyffe, J., Halai, N., Hall, F., Jensen, H., Marsh, H. & Ortega, S. (2014). The continuing Evolution of the Research Doctorate. Edited by Maresi Nerad & Barbara Evans. Published by: Sense Publisher
8. Bienkowska, D., & Klofsten, M. (2012). Creating entrepreneurial networks: Academic entrepreneurship, mobility and collaboration during PhD education. Higher Education, (64), 2, 207-222. Retrieved from www.springerlink.com.
9. Bok, D. (1990). Universities and the future of America. Duke University Press, Durham and London, Retrieved from http://books.google. com
10. Bozeman, B., & Lee, S. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 674-702.
11. Document of Strategic Development of Science and Technology (2011). Ministry of Science, Research and Technology (in Persian).
12. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘‘Mode 2’’ to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123. Retrieved from www.elsevier.nlrlocatereconbase.
13. Fairweather, J.S. (1990). The university's role in economic development: lessons for academic leaders. Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 22 (3), 5-11
14. Farasatkhah, M. (2008). Check the current situation and desirable scientific institutions in Iran with emphasis on higher education. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 2, 43-58 (in Persian).
15. Fathi Vajargah, K., Arefi, M., & Zamani Manesh, H. (2012). Evaluating admission barriers of foreign students into universities and institutions of higher education. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 17 (4), 65-80 (in Persian).
16. Fazeli, N. (2004). Globalization and global trends in revolution of higher education and solution of higher education in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Social Science, 33, 1-41(in Persian).
17. Fazeli, N. (2014). Culture and university. Saless Publisher, Version 2 (in Persian).
18. Gibbons, M., Limoge, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage Publication.
19. Haghdoost, A., Sadeghi Rad, B., Fasihi Harandi, M., & Rooh’l Amini, A. (2008). Phd education model in medical fields in Iran and the application of research based curriculum. Hakim, 11 (4), 8-15 (in Persian).
20. Harman, G. (2004). New directions in internationalizing higher education: Australia's development as an exporter of higher education services. Higher Education Policy, 17 (1), 101-120
21. Hashemian Isfahani, M. (2010). Science and technology foresight. Backup document of strategic development of Science and technology studies. Tehran: University Publication Center (in Persian).
22. Hawawini, G. (2011). The internationalization of higher education institutions: A critical review and a radical proposal. Instead working paper collection.
23. Hoddell, S., Street, D., & Wildblood, H. (2002). Doctorates- converging or diverging patterns of provision. Quality Assurance in Education, 10 (2), 61-70.
24. Javdani, H. (2013). Universities and globalization; concepts & approaches. Tehran: Institute for Research and Planning in Higher Education (in Persian).
25. Jensen, M.B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E. & Lundvall, B.Å. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 36 (5), 680-693 (in Persian).
26. Kehm, B.M. (2006). Doctoral education in Europe and North America: A comparative analysis. Portland Press Ltd.
27. Kitagawa, F. (2011). Industrial doctorates-employer engagement in research and skills formation. Published by the Centre for Learning and Life Chances in Knowledge Economies and Societies.
28. Knight, J., & De Wit, H. (1995). Strategies for internationalization of higher education: Historical and conceptual perspectives. Chapter 1, Retrieved from www.uni-kassel.de/wz1/mahe/course/module6_3/10_knight95.pdf.
29. Lee, H., & Mizzo, M. (2015). How does working on university-industry collaborative projects affect science and engineering doctorates’ careers? Evidence from a UK research-based university. J. Technol Transf, 40, 293-317.
30. Lee, Y. (1995). Technology transfer and the research university: A research for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration. Research Policy, 22. 843-863.
31. Mahdinejad, M. (2013). Interview in 28 October 2013: Isna (in Persian)
32. Matas, C. (2012). Doctoral education and skills development: An international perspective. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 10 (2), 163-191.
33. Melin, G. (2000). Pragmatism and self-organization research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy, 29, 31-40.
34. Nerad, M. (2010, October). The internationalization of doctoral education: A two-way street; Promoting Productive Educational Experiences. AC 21 International Shanghai, October 19-20. Retrieved from http://www.cirge.washington.edu.
35. Schwartz, P. (2009). Art vision: Planning for the future In a world of uncertainty. Translator: Alizadeh, A., Tehran: Defence Industries Training and Research Institute Future studies Defense Science and Technology Center (in Persian).
36. Scott, R. A. (1992). Campus developments in response to the challenges of internationalization: The case of Ramapo College of New Jersey (USA). Springfield: CBIS Federal.
37. Usher, R. (2002). A diversity of doctorates: Fitness for the knowledge economy?. Higher Education Research and Development Journal, 21 (2), 143-154.
38. Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2006). What is changing in academic research? Trends and futures scenarios. Forthcoming in the European Journal of Education. 41(2), 169-202.
39. Yadegari, M. (2013, April). Speaking at the first Congress of the Challenges and Strategies for the Development of Research-based Graduate Studies in Iran, 22 April (in Persian).
)