فصلنامه پژوهش و برنامه ریزی در آموزش عالی
بهره وری واحدهای آموزشی و پژوهشی در دانشگاههای جامع دولتی ایران
نویسندگان
1 عضو هیئت علمی دانشکده مهندسی صنایع دانشگاه صنعتی ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران
2 کارشناس ارشد مهندسی صنایع-سیستم‌های اقتصادی- اجتماعی، مؤسسه آموزش عالی الغدیر، تبریز، ایران
چکیده
بهدلیل کمبود نیروهای متخصص در برهه‌ای از زمان، دانشگاههای متعددی بدون توجه به سطح کیفی جامعه گسترش یافتند و این امر موجب افت کیفیت و متناسب نبودن تعداد دانشآموختگان با نیاز جامعه شد. امروزه، این کمبودها مرتفع شده و نیاز به کمّیت جای خود را به افزایش کیفیت تحصیلی داده است. در پژوهش حاضر تلاش شده است تا با استفاده از روشی مناسب وضعیت دانشگاههای بزرگ دولتی کشور بر اساس آخرین اطلاعات در دسترس ارزیابی و تحلیل شود. این بررسی با شاخصهای کارایی و بهرهوری واحدهای آموزشی و پژوهشی 20 دانشگاه مادر در تمام سطوح تحصیلی و اندازهگیری عوامل مؤثر بر آنها انجام شد و نتایج نشان داد که کارایی دانشگاهها در بخش آموزش نسبت به بخش پژوهش بیشتر است، درحالیکه روند رشد بهرهوری بخش پژوهش مثبت و بخش آموزش منفی است و در شرایط یکسان، بیشتر دانشگاهها بهطور نسبی ناکارا و فقط دانشگاههای شهید بهشتی و تهران در بخشهای آموزش و پژوهش نسبت به سایر دانشگاهها کارا هستند؛ سایر دانشگاهها رشد متوازنی ندارند و اتخاذ مدیریت برنامه‌ریزی راهبردی و ایجاد فضای رقابت برای بهبود بهرهوری دانشگاهها ضرورت دارد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Productivity of educational units in Iran's comprehensive public universities
نویسندگان [English]
- Rahim Dabbagh 1
- Lila Javaherian 2
1 Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Urmia University of Technology
2 Graduated Student of Industrial Engineering, Alghadir Higher Education Institute
چکیده [English]
Because of the shortage of experts in some periods, many universities were established without considering quality. This caused a decline in quality of educational system and a mismatch between numbers of graduates and society's needs. Today, shortages had been overcome and quantity expansion is replaced by needs for quality expansion. This paper attempted to measure efficiency and productivity of 20 comprehensive public universities in all levels, and determines factors effecting productivity growth such as efficiency change and technological growth. Data envelopment analysis, as an appropriate method to measure efficiency and productivity changes, was used. Results showed that that the efficiency of teaching sector is better than research sector, whereas productivity change of reaserch sector was positive and teaching sector was negetive. Furthermore, in an equal conditions, most universities were relatively inefficient. Only Shahid Beheshti University and University of Tehran were somewhat efficient institutions in both teaching and research. Other universities didn’t have balanced growt . It is necessary to have strategic plans and creating a competitive environment in order to increase productivity in Iran's universities.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- public universities
- Efficiency
- productivity
- Malmquist Index
2. Gacia-Aracil, A. (2008, September). Evaluation of Spanish Universities: Efficiency, Technology and Productivity Change. Paper presented in the Prime-Latin America Conference at Mexico City, September 24-26.
3. Avkiran, K. (1999). Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian Universities' through data envelopment analysis. Socio Economic Planning Sciences, No. 35.
4. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W.W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078-1092.
5. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444
6. Dabbagh, R., Baradaran Shoraka, H.R., & Feyzi, S. (2010). Identifying indicators to evaluate the performance of universities in the country using fuzzy logic. Journal of Psychology and Education, Tehran University, 40(2) (in Persian).
7. Emami Meibodi, A. (2005). Principles of efficiency and productivity measurement (scientific-practical).Tehran: The Institute for Trade Studies & Research, 2eds Edition (in Persian).
8. Fazli, Z. (2002). Mathematical modeling managers, performance assessment using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Humanities Teacher, 6(26), 99-124(in Persian).
9. Forsund, F.R., & Kalhagen, K.O. (1998). Efficiency and productivity of Norwegian colleges. Department of Economics, University of Oslo.
10. Flegg, A.T., Allen, D.O., Field, K., & T.W. Thurlow, T.W. (2004). Measuring the efficiency of British Universities: A multi- period data envelopment analysis. Education Economics, 12(3), 231-249.
11. Heidarinejad, S., Mozafari, A., & Mohaghar, A. (2006). Assessment of physical education faculties and departments at state universities with mathematical model DEA. Journal of Olympic, 34, 7-18 (in Persian).
12. Pour-Kazemi, M.H., Samsami, H., & Ebrahimi Ghavam Abadi, Kh. (2011). The efficiency and productivity of public and private insurance companies using DEA and Malmquist Index. Journal of Insurance, 26(4), 1-26(in Persian).
13. IssaKhani, A. (2002). Model evaluates the performance of departments using DEA Tarbiat Modarres University. (Master thesis). Tarbiat Modarres University (in Persian).
14. Johnes, J. (2006). Efficiency and productivity change in the English higher education sector from 1996/97 to 2002/03. Lancaster University Management School, United Kingdom. Working Papers.
15. Molaei, M., Jahanshahi, H., & Ghazizadeh, SZ. (2011). Assessing the efficiency of research and development (R&D) centers with window data envelopment analysis approaches. 3rd National Conference on Data Envelopment Analysis, Azad University, Firouzkooh Branch (in Persian).
16. Momeni, A. (2004). Using dynamic model design productivity DEA. School of Humanities, TarbiatModarres University (in Persian).
17. Tavakkoli Moghaddam, R., Sadegh Amal Nik, M., & Rafati, M.A. (2004). Methodology using DEA research organizations. College of Engineering, 38(1), 175-185 (in Persian).
18. Vocabulary Terms (2007). The Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, The Institute for Research and Planning in Higher Education (in Persian).
)