ارائه مدلی برای رابطه نظام‌مند دانشکده مدیریت و ذینفعان زیست بوم

نویسندگان
1 استاد، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران.
2 دانشجوی دکتری رشته مدیریت سیاستگذاری بازرگانی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران.
3 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران.
4 استادیار، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران.
10.61838/KMAN.IRPHE.31.2.5
چکیده
دانشکده‌های مدیریت در جایگاه متولیان اصلی مدیریت به ­عنوان مهم­ ترین عامل بهره‌وری و رشد اقتصادی و نیز به­ منظور تاب‌آوری خود باید به ­درستی به نیازها و انتظارات ذینفعان زیست‌بوم در حیطه مأموریت خود پاسخ دهند. این امر آن‌ها را ناگزیر از برقراری رابطه ای نظام ­مند با زیست ­بوم می‌سازد. هدف این پژوهش ارائه مدلی برای برقراری رابطه نظام‌مند میان دانشکده‌های مدیریت و زیست ­بوم (مدل سامانه‌ای اکوکنترل) بود. این پژوهش از نوع کاربردی بود و بر مبنای روش تحقیق آمیخته اکتشافی انجام شد. در بخش کیفی با ده نفر از خبرگان و ذینفعان زیست ­بوم بر مبنای نمونه‌گیری هدفمند و گلوله‌برفی مصاحبه‌های نیمه‌ساختمند انجام شد و عوامل مدل با روش تحلیل مضمون هیبریدی استخراج شدند. بخش کمّی نیز با روش مدلسازی ساختاری تفسیری و بر مبنای قضاوت‌های پنج نفر از مشارکت‌کنندگانِ مرحله کیفی در قالب پرسشنامه مقایسات زوجی انجام شد. خروجی این مرحله، سطح‌بندی عوامل برای تعیین روابط میان آنهاست. یافته‌های این پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که برقراری رابطه نظام‌مند میان دانشکده و زیست­‌بوم مستلزم بهره‌گیری از سازوکارهای حاکمیت سازمانی، پایش محیطی، مدیریت ذینفعان و قرارداد مسئولیت اجتماعی دانشکده‌ای و پیاده‌سازی آن‌ها بر عهده کارآفرینان نهادی است. برقراری این نوع رابطه با هدف پاسخگویی به انتظارات ذینفعان زیست­ بوم و تاب‌آوری دانشکده مدیریت موارد مهمی هستند که در پژوهش‌های پیشین داخلی و خارجی به ­صورت منسجم در قالب یک مدل به آن پرداخته نشده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله English

A Model for Eco Control Based On Institutional Entrepreneurial Approach

نویسندگان English

, Hossein Rahmanseresht 1
Zahra Amini 2
Mehdi Ebrahimi 3
Shahram Khalil Nejad 4
1 Professor, Department of Business Administration, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Doctoral student in business policy management, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Associate Professor, Department of Business Administration, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran.
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Business Administration, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

The paramount role of management  schools in driving productivity and fostering economic growth as well as in order to maintain their position and resilience underscores the critical need for management schools to effectively address the expectations of stakeholders within their ecosystem. This necessitates the establishment of a systematic relationship between management schools and ecosystem. This study aims to present a model, termed the ecocontrol system model, for establishing such a systematic relationship. Employing a mixed exploratory research approach, the qualitative phase involved semi-structured interviews with ten experts and ecosystem stakeholders, facilitating the extraction of model factors through hybrid thematic analysis. Subsequently, the quantitative phase utilized interpretive structural modeling, informed by pairwise comparison questionnaires from five qualitative participants, to determine factor relationships. The results reveal that the systematic relationship between schools and the ecosystem hinges upon organizational governance mechanisms, environmental scanning, stakeholder management, and the faculty's social responsibility contract, with implementation entrusted to institutional entrepreneurs. This research addresses a significant gap by offering a cohesive model for systematically fostering stakeholder expectations and enhancing the resilience of management faculties, a topic largely overlooked in prior domestic and international research efforts.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

systematic relationship
management schools
eco control
ecosystem
institutional entrepreneurs
Adams, C. A., Heijltjes, M. G., Jack, G., Marjoribanks, T., & Powell, M. (2011). The development of leaders able to respond to climate change and sustainability challenges: The role of business schools. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 2(1), 165-171. https://doi.org/10.1108/20408021111162191
Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2016). Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re‐examining technology S‐curves. Strategic Management Journal, 37(4), 625-648. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2363
Alvani, S. M. (2016). public Management. Ney Publishing.
Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2019). Neo-institutional theory and organization studies: a mid-life crisis? Organization Studies, 40(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618772610
Ankrah, S., & Omar, A. T. (2015). Universities-industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3), 387-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2015.02.003
Annarelli, A., & Nonino, F. (2016). Strategic and operational management of organizational resilience: Current state of research and future directions. Omega, 62, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.08.004
Arroyo, P. (2012). Management accounting change and sustainability: an institutional approach. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 8(3), 286-309. https://doi.org/10.1108/18325911211258317
Arroyo, P. (2013). Eco-control and the process of institutionalization of sustainable business campuses in Quebec. HEC Montreal (Canada). https://search.proquest.com/openview/853f99af84badcb46d32a49b4d654d84/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
Ashrieh. (2016). meta-analysis of the link between industry and university (Vol. 9). Journal of Industry and University.
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307
Bagheri Majid, R. (2015). Designing a model of communication between the university and the society in the process of resistance economy. Secretariat of the Supreme Council of Cultural Revolution: Research Vice-Chancellor.
Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. (2010). Why do management practices differ across firms and countries? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(1), 203-224. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.1.203
Boyle, M. E. (2004). Walking our talk: Business schools, legitimacy, and citizenship. Business & Society, 43(1), 37-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650303262638
Carton, G., McMillan, C., & Overall, J. (2018). Strategic capacities in US universities - the role of business schools as institutional builders. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(1), 186-198. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(1).2018.18
Casey, T. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility in Nonprofit Organizations: How Nonprofits Leverage CSR and Sustainability Reporting. University of San Francisco, San Francisco. https://usfblogs.usfca.edu/nonprofit/files/2016/05/caseytom_6177229_64621338_Tom-Casey-Capstone-Paper-1sojbbj.pdf
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: a practical guide. Thematic Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_3470-2
Cuomo, F., Mallin, C., & Zattoni, A. (2016). Corporate governance codes: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 222-241. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12148
Danivi, F., Makkizadeh, F., Afrasiabi, H., Asadnia, A., & Falakodin, Z. (2024). Individual-organizational construction of research from the opinions of faculty members. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 30(3), 20-38. https://doi.org/10.61838/KMAN.IRPHE.30.3.2
Davies, J. (2016). Are business school deans doomed? The global financial crisis, Brexit and all that. Journal of Management Development, 35(7), 901-915. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-09-2014-0114
De Colle, S. (2005). A stakeholder management model for ethical decision making. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 6(3-4), 299-314. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDM.2005.006555
Deegan, C. (2009). financial accounting theory. McGraw Hill. https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/publications/financial-accounting-theory
DiMaggio, P. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. Institutional patterns and organizations culture and environment. https://doi.org/10.20795/jasess.30.0_71
Duchek, S. (2019). Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization. Business Research, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7
Falkenstein, M. (2017). The Development of Responsible Management Education in European Business Schools: Responses to the 2013 EQUIS Accreditation Standards. https://scispace.com/papers/the-development-of-responsible-management-education-in-22xnhfr04q?references_page=8
Firuzjaeyan, A. A., Firuzjaeyan, M., Hashemi Petroodi, S. H., & Gholamrezazadeh, F. (2013). Applying Techniques of Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) in Tourism Studies (A Pathological Approach). Journal of Tourism Planning and Development, 2(6), 129-159. https://tourismpd.journals.umz.ac.ir/article_552_en.html?lang=en
Fragueiro, F., & Thomas, H. (2011). Strategic leadership in the business school: Keeping one step ahead. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921087
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192675
Greenwood, R., Meyer, R. E., Lawrence, T. B., & Oliver, C. (2017). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280669.n1
Habisch, A., Patelli, L., Pedrini, M., & Schwartz, C. (2011). Different talks with different folks: a comparative survey of stakeholder dialog in Germany, Italy, and the US. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(3), 381-404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0715-7
Hamidi Mutlaq, R., Babaei, A., & Maleki, A. (2016). collective movements and institutional and technological changes: a review of several selected innovation systems (Vol. 6). Science and Technology Policy. https://stpl.ristip.sharif.ir/article_1387.html?lang=fa
Hannah, D. P., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2018). How firms navigate cooperation and competition in nascent ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(12), 3163-3192. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2750
Harvard Business, R. (2015). The best-performing CEOs in the world. Harvard business review, 93(11), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.54784/1990-6587.1072
Hosseini Largani, S. M. (2023). A Conceptualization of green curriculum in Iran's higher education system. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 29(2), 51-68. https://doi.org/10.61838/irphe.29.2.3
Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 235-256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2010.00259.x
Khastar, H. (2009). Presenting a method for calculating the reliability of the coding stage in research interviews (Vol. 15). Humanities Methodology. https://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_418_en.html?lang=en
Kramer, M. R., & Porter, M. (2011). Creating shared value (Vol. 17). FSG. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-024-1144-7_16
Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/titel/352646
Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). 1.6 institutions and institutional work. The Sage handbook of organization studies. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608030.n7
Lengnick-Hall, C. A., Beck, T. E., & Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2011). Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 21(3), 243-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.07.001
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1976). Organizational choice under ambiguity (Vol. 2). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. https://archive.org/details/ambiguitychoicei0000marc
Maskrey, S. A., Mount, N. J., Thorne, C. R., & Dryden, I. (2016). Participatory modelling for stakeholder involvement in the development of flood risk management intervention options. Environmental Modelling & Software, 82, 275-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.04.027
Miotto, G., Del-Castillo-Feito, C., & Blanco-González, A. (2020). Reputation and legitimacy: Key factors for Higher Education Institutions' sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Business Research, 112, 342-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.076
Murmann, J. P. (2003). Knowledge and competitive advantage: The coevolution of firms, technology, and national institutions. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510953
Navarro, P. (2008). The MBA core curricula of top-ranked US business schools: a study in failure? , 7(1), 108-123. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2008.31413868
Nistorescu, T., & Barbu, C. M. (2006). A model for enterprises' environmental scanning. Management & Marketing, 4(1), 57-62. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=180721
Norollahee, S., & Ghanbari, S. (2024). Designing and Validating the Model of the Characteristics of Boundary Spanner Faculty Members. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 30(3), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.61838/KMAN.IRPHE.30.3.1
Ntim, C. G. (2018). Defining corporate governance: Shareholder versus stakeholder models. Ntim, CG (2018). Defining Corporate Governance: Shareholder versus Stakeholder Models', in "Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy and Governance", Springer, USA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20928-9_3132
Ozalp, H., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Disruption in Platform‐Based Ecosystems. Journal of Management Studies, 55(7), 1203-1241. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12351
Pakdaman, Z. (2001). Assessing the coordination of the capabilities of the Master of Business Administration students with the needs of exporting producers in Tehran. Allameh Tabatabai University.
Proudfoot, K. (2023). Inductive/Deductive hybrid thematic analysis in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(3), 308-326. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221126816
Qin, B., & Yang, L. (2022). CSR contracting and performance-induced CEO turnover. Journal of Corporate Finance, 73, 102173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.102173
Rahmanseresht, H. (2023). theories of organization and management from modernism to postmodernism. Doran Publishing. https://jsmd.guilan.ac.ir/article_8254.html?lang=en
Rao, H., Morrill, C., & Zald, M. N. (2000). Power plays: How social movements and collective action create new organizational forms. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 237-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22007-8
Robinson, C. V. (2015). An exploration of external environmental scanning and the strategy process. Heriot-Watt University. http://www.ros.hw.ac.uk/handle/10399/3030
Sadeghi Ravesh, M. H. (2022). Application of Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) in Analyzing Obstacles to Combat Desertification with Pathological Approach in Yazd Province. J Watershed Manage Res, 13(25), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.52547/jwmr.13.25.119
Schiehll, E., & Martins, H. C. (2016). Cross‐national governance research: A systematic review and assessment. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12158
Schoemaker, P. J. (2024). Integrating Diverse Perspectives in Strategy Studies1. https://www.strategicmanagementreview.net/assets/articles/Schoemaker%20(SMR%20923).pdf
Shiri, H. (2015). Examining the relationship between the university and the industry and its challenges: a qualitative research among Tehran University students (Vol. 8). Journal of industry and university. http://jiu.ir/en/Article/114
Song, Y., Ali, A., Wang, G., & Wang, W. (2024). Environmental scanning, cross‐functional coordination and the adoption of green strategies: An information processing perspective. Creativity and Innovation Management, 33(1), 39-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12579
Sun, S. L., Zhang, Y., Cao, Y., Dong, J., & Cantwell, J. (2019). Enriching innovation ecosystems: The role of government in a university science park. Global Transitions, 1, 104-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2019.05.002
Swain, J. (2018). A hybrid approach to thematic analysis in qualitative research: Using a practical example. Sage research methods. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526435477
Teece, D. J. (2023). The evolution of the dynamic capabilities framework. Artificiality and sustainability in entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11371-0_6
Thoenig, J. C., & Paradeise, C. (2016). Strategic capacity and organisational capabilities: A challenge for universities. Minerva, 54(3), 293-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-016-9297-6
Thomas, H. (2007). An analysis of the environment and competitive dynamics of management education. Journal of Management Development, 26(1), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710710720040
Thomas, H., & Thomas, L. (2011). Perspectives on leadership in business schools. Journal of Management Development, 30(5), 526-540. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711111133037
Thompson, J. D. (2017). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315125930
Tieman, R. (2016). Why business schools are tailoring leadership courses to NGOs' needs. Financial Times. https://www. ft. com/content/c6356c8c-168f-11e6-b197-a4af20d5575e
Walrave, B., Talmar, M., Podoynitsyna, K. S., Romme, A. G. L., & Verbong, G. P. (2018). A multi-level perspective on innovation ecosystems for path-breaking innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.011
Washburn, N. T., Waldman, D. A., Sully de Luque, M. F., & Carter, M. Z. (2018). Executives' Stakeholder Values in the Prediction of Work Process Change. Journal of Management Studies, 55(8), 1423-1451. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12394
 

  • تاریخ دریافت 03 اردیبهشت 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 25 شهریور 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 27 شهریور 1403
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 تیر 1404