فصلنامه پژوهش و برنامه ریزی در آموزش عالی

بازشناسی مفهوم نوآوری و ویژگی‌های دانشگاه نوآور در تمایز با دانشگاه کارآفرین مبتنی بر روش فراترکیب

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 پژوهشگر مرکز تحقیقات سیاست علمی کشور، تهران، ایران

2 استاد موسسه پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی آموزش عالی، تهران، ایران

3 استاد دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

10.61838/irphe.29.3.3

چکیده

در پژوهش حاضر محقق با انتخاب صفت نوآوری برای دانشگاه و همچنین وارد کردن این کلید واژه در بررسی سیستماتیک ادبیات موجود(2020-1970)، قصد دارد علاوه بر ارائه‌ی الگوی مفهومی دانشگاه نوآور با رویکردی سیستمی، برای نخستین بار بر تفاوت میان دانشگاه نوآور و دانشگاه کارآفرین تاکید کند. در همین راستا، پژوهش به روش کیفی و با رویکرد فراترکیب( مبتنی بر مراحل هفتگانه‌ی سندِلوسکی و بارو) انجام شده است. یافته‌های پژوهش در قالب پاسخگویی به سوالات تحقیق و مدل برآمده از تحقیق با 4 مقوله‌ی خوشه‌ای، 12 مقوله‌ی‌ اصلی و25 مولفه حاکی از آن است که دانشگاه نوآور بیشتر تداعی کننده‌ی مفهوم "دانشگاه سازگارشونده" با تاکید بر تطابق با نیازهای اجتماعی محیط متغیر و نه صرفاً کسب سود و درآمد می‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Presenting the Conceptual Model of Innovative University Based on the Meta-Synthesis Method (With Emphasis on Distinction of Entrepreneurship and Innovation)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Masoomeh Cham Asemani 1
  • Maghsoud Farasatkhah 2
  • Seyed Mohammad Mirkamali 3

1 Researcher of National Scientific Policy Research Center, Iran

2 Professor, Institute for Research and Planning in Higher Education, Iran

3 Professor, Department of Educational Management and Planning, University of Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

The concept of innovation is one of the concepts that has been misunderstood in various areas, or confused with concepts such as entrepreneurship, creativity, or change, and has been used synonymously as an adjective for individuals and institutions, especially for the academic institutions. The present study has been conducted with the aim of investigating this concept versus entrepreneurship and also extracting the specific characteristics of the innovative university in the existing literature by a qualitative method. In this regard, the meta-synthesis method has been used as a method to create a new idea or new interpretation of the findings of previous research (26 international scientific articles and 7 domestic articles among 352 papers over a period of fifty years). Consequently, depending on the model deriving from the research, it was identified that one of the key features of an innovative university is multiple interactions, especially with civil society, and also fulfilling the social needs. Therefore, the innovative university is more reminiscent of the concept of an "adaptive university" with an emphasis on adapting to the social needs of a changing environment, rather than merely achieving financial benefits.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Innovative University
  • Innovation
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Adaptive University
  • Meta-Synthesis Method
Ab Hamid, M. R., Abdullah, M., Mustafa, Z., Nur-Balqishanis, B., Zainal, A., & Ahmad, H. (2015). Conceptual framework of innovation excellence model for higher education institutions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2846-2848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.977
Barzegar, N., Ghorchian, N., & Taghipur Zahir, A. (2019). Pathology of Innovation Capabilities creation in Iranian University Management (Case: Islamic Azad University). Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 10(37), 291-310. https://jedu.marvdasht.iau.ir/article_3471.html
Bazargan, A., & Farasatkhah, M. (2019). Monitoring and evaluation in higher education. Samt. https://samt.ac.ir/fa/book/39/
Berestova, T. (2009). From innovative projects to an innovative university. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 36(3), 180-185. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688209030095
Casas Armengol, M., & Stojanovic, L. (2013). Innovation in Ibero-American Universities. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 10(1), 240-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v10i1.1345
Clark, B. R. (1995). Leadership and innovation in universities from theory to practice. Tertiary Education & Management, 1(1), 7-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.1995.9966849
Clark, B. R. (1996). Case studies of innovative universities: A progress report. Tertiary Education and Management, 2(1), 52-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.1996.9966885
Dorakhshah, J., & Taghizade, A. (2013). Methodology of Conceptualization: From Conceptual Reduction to Phenomenological Reduction (A case study of the Concept of Politics in Muslim Thought). Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 5(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.7508/isih.2014.17.001
Elrehail, H., Emeagwali, O. L., Alsaad, A., & Alzghoul, A. (2018). The impact of transformational and authentic leadership on innovation in higher education: The contingent role of knowledge sharing. Telematics and Informatics, 35(1), 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.018
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Social science information, 42(3), 293-337. https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002
Fadaee, A., & Abd Alzahrh, H. O. (2014). Explaining the relationship between creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship. International Journal of Economy, Management and Social Sciences, 3(12), 1-4.
Farasatkhah, M. (2017). Occasions of university in Iran (new and critical discussions on university of science and higher education studies). Agah Publication.
Faridi, R., Abbaszadeh, M., Hassani, M., Galavandi, H., & Sobhaninejad, M. (2017). Designing a model for readiness assessment of higher education institutions to become a third generation university. Training and Learning Reseach, 15(1), 23-41. https://www.sid.ir/paper/519845/fa
Gertner, J. (2020). Reviw of how innovation works and why innovation flourishes in freedom book by Matt Redley, https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/an-exploration-of-how-innovation -worksworks  
Haddawy, P. Igel. B. (2006). Fostering innovation in higher education, Asian Institute of Technology, Pathumthani.
Hasanefendic, S., Birkholz, J. M., Horta, H., & van der Sijde, P. (2017). Individuals in action: Bringing about innovation in higher education. European Journal of Higher Education, 7(2), 101-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2017.1296367
Herber, O. R., & Barroso, J. (2020). Lessons learned from applying Sandelowski and Barroso’s approach for synthesising qualitative research. Qualitative research, 20(4), 414-431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119862440
Huang, M. (2017). How can academic innovation performance in university-industry collaboration be improved? Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 123, 210–215.
Javanmardi, S., Abaspoor, A., Khorsandi taskooh, A., & Ghiyasi nodoshan, S. (2018). Designing an innovative university model in the framework of the innovation ecosystem in Iran. Iranian Higher Education, 10(4), 137-170. http://ihej.ir/browse.php?a_id=1186&sid=1&slc_lang=en
Khanian, E., Hoseini, M., & Jamali, A. (2019). Designing an innovative university Model in Islamic Azad University. Social Science.
Khayati, A., & Selim, M. (2019). The status of innovation in Saudi Universities. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1653635. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1653635
Khoddam Abbasi, N., Shahryaripour, R., & Aminbeidokhti, A. (2017). Presentation Model of Innovation at the University, Based on Culture of Learning and Knowledge Management. Higher Education Letter, 10(37), 33-60. https://journal.sanjesh.org/m/article_26652_30a1a73cc964dee49be297ef2b4b9285.pdf
Konjkav, M. & Ardakani .S. (2014). An Analysis of the status of knowledge management in higher education institutes and its relation with innovation. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 5(17), 103-120. (In Persian).
Kheirgoo, M. & Beadollah Khani, F. (2019). Designing the pattern of innovation in defense organizations qualitative research based on grounded theory. Innovation Management in Defense Organizations, 2(4), 115-134. doi: 10.22034/qjimdo.2019.93812.
Kunttu, L. (2017). Educational involvement in innovative-university –collaboration, Technology Innovation Management Review, l7 (12).
Lašáková, A., Bajzíková, Ľ., & Dedze, I. (2017). Barriers and drivers of innovation in higher education: Case study-based evidence across ten European universities. International Journal of Educational Development, 55, 69-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.06.002
Mahbubi, T. & Ture.N. (2008). Pathology of creativity and innovation in university, Islamic Azad University, 12(1) (In Persian).
Maier, R. H., & Weidner, E. W. (1975). Creating and encouraging an innovative academic environment in higher education. Higher Education, 69-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01569103
McClure, K. R. (2016). Building the innovative and entrepreneurial university: An institutional case study of administrative academic capitalism. The Journal of Higher Education, 87(4), 516-543. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.11777412
Miyata, Y. (2000). An empirical analysis of innovative activity of universities in the United States. Technovation, 20(8), 413-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(00)00024-9
Moona, H., Mariadossb, J. Babu, J. Jean, L. (2019). Collaboration with higher education institutions for successful firm innovation, Journal of Business Research, 99, 534–541.
Mousavi, S. H., Salehi Omran, I., Farasatkhah, M., & Towfighi, J. (2018). Providing a model for development of entrepreneurial university in Iran. Engineering Education, 19(76), 1-58. https://doi.org/10.22047/ijee.2018.98838.1481
Pogodaeva, T., Zhaparova, D., & Irina, E. (2015). Changing role of the university in innovation development: new challenges for Russian regions, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014 (2015),  359-367,
Resnick, D. P. (2012). Innovative universities: When, why and how. Journal of Educational Planning and Administration, 26(2), 331-341. https://www.cmu.edu/innovativeuniversity/Innovative-Univs_When-Why-How_2012.pdf
Rooij, A. van. (2014). University knowledge production and innovation: getting a grip, Minerva, 52(2), 263-272.
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. springer publishing company. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130282271118861312
Schmitz, A., Dandolini, G. A., & Souza, J. A. (2014). Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the Academic Setting from the Perspective of
Quantitative Empirical Research. https://www.academia.edu/30697844/Innovation_and_Entrepreneurship_in_the_Academic_Setting_from_the_Perspective_of_Quantitative_Empirical_Research
Sporn, B. (1999). Towards more adaptive universities: Trends of institutional reform in Europe. Higher Education in Europe, 24(1), 23-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/0379772990240103
Styron, R. A. (2015). Fostering innovation in higher education through entrepreneurial leadership systematic, Cybernetics and Informatics. 13(6), 57-61.
Tierney, W. G., & Lanford, M. (2016). Conceptualizing innovation in higher education. Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, 1-40. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-26829-3_1
Tijssen, R.J, W. & Winnink. Jos J. (2018). Capturing R&D excellence: indicators, international Statistics and innovative universities, Scientometrics, 114, 687–699.
Tseng, F.-C., Huang, M.-H., & Chen, D.-Z. (2020). Factors of university–industry collaboration affecting university innovation performance. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45, 560-577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9656-6
Turay, S. (2017). Innovation and entrepreneurship relationship. Available at SSRN 3009870. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3009870
Van Vught, F. A. (1989). Creating innovations in higher education. European Journal of Education, 24(3), 249-270. https://doi.org/10.2307/1502744
Vught. F. (1999). Innovative universities, Tertiary Education and Management, 5(4), 347–355.
Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2005). Meta‐synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. Journal of advanced nursing, 50(2), 204-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03380.x
Yamani Douzi Sorkhabi, M. (2018). Higher Education Development Planning, Reductionist Approach, complex situation. In: Tehran: Samt Publications.[in Persian].
Zimmer, L. (2006). Qualitative meta‐synthesis: a question of dialoguing with texts. Journal of advanced nursing, 53(3), 311-318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03721.x
فصلنامه پژوهش و برنامه ریزی در آموزش عالی
دوره 29، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 109
آذر 1402
صفحه 37-52