نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران
2 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی گرایش مدیریت رفتار سازمانی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران
چکیده
شکل گیری تعاملات پایدار میان دانشگاه و صنعت همواره از دغدغه های نظام آموزش عالی بوده است. با این حال، این تعاملات همواره به دلایل مختلف با چالش مواجه بوده است. دلایل این امر را می‌توان ناشی از نوع نگرش‌ها به نقش دانشگاه در تعامل با صنعت، شکل نگرفتن تعاملات راهبردی مبتنی بر ارزش افزایی مشترک با صنعت و شکل نگرفتن سازوکارهای کارآمد مبتنی بر این نقش ها دانست. پژوهش حاضر با هدف آسیب شناسی و دستیابی به الگویی برای راهبری ارتباطات بین دانشگاه و صنعت انجام شد. روش پژوهش کیفی و استراتژی آن پدیدارشناسی بود. با بهره گیری از روش نمونه گیری هدفمند، با خبرگان شامل اعضای هیئت علمی فعال در طرح های برون دانشگاهی و نیز مدیران صنایع و سازمان‌ها در شهر مشهد مصاحبه شد. نتایج به دست آمده از چند مرحله کدگذاری، ارائه دهنده مدلی مشتمل بر چهار نوع نقش از طرف دانشگاه در ارتباط با صنعت و جامعه است. یافته ها نشان داد که دانشگاه در تعاملات خود با صنعت و جامعه به ترتیب و در درجات بلوغ بالاتر می تواند نقش های دانشگاه در نقش پیمانکار، دانشگاه در نقش مرکز دانش و فناوری، دانشگاه در نقش مؤسسه هاب و دانشگاه در نقش شریک راهبردی را ایفا کند. در این مطالعه نقش های یادشده تبیین و سازوکارهای مرتبط با هر کدام ارائه شده است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
University and industry: From contracting relations to strategic partnerships; providing strategic role model in university-society relations
نویسندگان [English]
- Mohammad Mahdi Farahi 1
- Fatemeh Beigi Nasrabadi 2
1 Assistant professor, Management Department, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
2 Ph.D. candidate in Public Administration- Organizational Behavior, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
چکیده [English]
Establishing sustainable and effective interactions between university and society has always been a concern for higher education system. However, these interactions have always been challenged for various reasons. The reasons can be attributed to the type of attitudes toward the roles a university plays in interaction with industry, the lack of value-added strategic interactions with industry, and the lack of efficient mechanisms based on these roles. The present study aimed at pathology of university- industry relations, and to design a model for guiding the relationship between university and industry. The research method was qualitative using a phenomenological strategy approach. Utilizing purposeful sampling method, interviews were conducted with experts including faculty members active in external university projects and industries and organizations’ managers in city of Mashhad. The results of several coding steps provided a model comprising four types of roles for the university in relation to industry and society. The findings showed that the university in its interactions with industry and society at higher levels of maturity can play the roles of “contractor”, “knowledge and technology center”, “ hub institute” and “strategic partner” respectively. In this study, the mentioned roles are explained and the related mechanisms are presented.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- University-industry relations management
- University and society
- Higher Education
- Excellence model
- Phenomenology
2. Badpar, H. (2014). Assessing the challenges of effective communication between university and urban management in Mashhad: scenario planning. (M.A. Thesis). Supervised by Omid Ali Kharazmi, Department of Geography and Urban Management, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (in Persian).
3. Balconi, M., Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2004). Networks of inventors and the role of academia: An exploration of Italian patent data, Res. Policy, 33 (1), 127-145.
4. Bryman, A. (2001). Social research methods. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Chang, S.H. (2017). The technology networks and development trends of university-industry collaborative patents, technological forecasting & social change. Published Online, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.006.
6. D’Este, P., & Perkmann, M. (2011). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36, 316-339.
7. Erfanmanesh, A., Moghiseh, Z., & Forozandeh Shahraki, M. (2018). Comparing the share of scholarly output published through the collaboration between universities and industries in Iran, Middle East and the World, Research Gate. Published online, Retrieved from https://www.researchgate. net/publication/322655755.
8. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Introduction to special issue on science policy dimensions of the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations.
9. Fischer, B.B., Schaeffer, P.R., & Vonortas, N.S. (2019). Evolution of university-industry collaboration in Brazil from a technology upgrading perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 330-340.
10. Guan, J., & Zhao, Q. (2013). The impact of university-industry collaboration networks on innovation in Nano biopharmaceuticals. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 80, 1271-1276.
11. Husserl, E. (1983). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: First book (F. Kersten, Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
12. Ivascu, L., Cirjaliu, B., & Draghici, A. (2016). Business model for the university-industry collaboration in open innovation. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39, 674-678.
13. Jokar, T., & Morovati, M. (2016). Investigating the status of university, industry, and government relations in scientific productions based on the Triple Helix Model. Science and Technology Policy, 8(3), 71-86 (in Persian).
14. Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15. Lundvall, B.A. (1992). National innovation system: Towards a theorem of innovation and interactive learning/B.
16. Luo, J.M., & Lam, C.F. (2019). Qualitative analysis of satisfying and dissatisfying factors in a university-industry cooperation programme. Education Sciences, 9(1), 56.
17. Liew, M.S., Shahdan, T.T., & Lim, E.S. (2013). Enablers in enhancing the relevancy of university-industry collaboration. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1889-1896.
18. Lukovics, M., & Zuti, B. (2017). Successful universities towards the improvement of regional competitiveness: ‘fourth generation’universities. Retrieved from SSRN 3022717.
19. Mirshekari, A., Hejazi, S.Y., Movahed Mohammadi S.H. & Hosseini, S.M. (2016). Explaining the influential mechanisms in university-industry interaction in agriculture. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 22(2), 147-172.
20. Narimani, A.R., Vaezi, R., Alvani, S.M., & Ghorbanizadeh, V. (2017). Identifying university external organizational factors and barriers in commercializing humanities research. Management and Development Process, 30(1), 110-81 (in Persian).
21. Pervan, M., Curak, M., & Pavic Kramaric, T. (2018). The influence of industry characteristics and dynamic capabilities on firms’ profitability. J. Financial Studies, 6 (4), 1-19.
22. Porter, M.E. (1990). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance, E-book, Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books/ about/Competitive_Advantage.html.
23. Romero, F.C. (2019). Social network analysis and the study of university industry relations. In Advanced Methodologies and Technologies in Media and Communications (pp. 550-562). IGI Global.
24. Salleh, M.S., & Omar, M. Z. (2013). University-industry collaboration models in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 654-664.
25. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research methods for business students. 7th ed., Harlow: Pearson Education [Online].
26. Sarpong, D., AbdRazak, A., Alexander, E., & Meissner, D. (2015). Organizing practices of university, industry and government that facilitate (or impede) the transition to a hybrid triple helix model of innovation. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.032.
27. Shokry, M. (2015). A regional model for urban sustainability: Emerging innovation clusters within knowledge societies - MENA region case. Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 193, 107-119.
28. Sobhani, F., Ebrahimi, S., & Jokar, A.R. (2017). University, industry and government scientific relations in Iran based on the Triple Helix Model in agriculture. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 23 (3), 21-41(in Persian).
29. Tartari, V., Perkmann, M., & Salter, A. (2014). In good company: The influence of peers on industry engagement by academic scientists. Research Policy, 43, 1189-1203.
30. The Work Foundation of UK. (2010). Anchoring growth: The role of ‘Anchor Institutions’ in the regeneration of UK cities. Regeneration Momentum.
31. Van Dierdonck, R., Debackere, K., & Engelen, B., (1990). University-industry relationships: How does the Belgian academic community feel about it?. Research Policy, 19, 551-566.
32. Wissema, J.G. (2009). Towards the third generation university. Managing the university in transition. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, United Kingdom.
33. Yigitcanla, T., O’Connor, K., & Westerman, C. (2008). The making of knowledge cities: Melbourne’s knowledge based urban development experience. Cities, (25), 63-72.
34. Zhao, Q.J., & Guan, J.C. (2011). International collaboration of three ‘giants’ with the G7 countries in emerging Nano biopharmaceuticals. Scientometrics, 87 (1), 159-170.
)