A Phenomenological Study of the Challenges of Transferring to Virtual Learning in Iranian Universities with Regard to the Corona Pandemic

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Sheyda Echresh
Ali Beiramipur
Parsa
10.61838/irphe.29.1.5
Abstract
The Covid-19 crisis, surprisingly and in a short period of time, transformed the way of teaching in higher education and imposed virtual and technology-based education on universities.  This sudden change, in addition to opportunities and benefits, has brought short-term and long-term challenges to the higher education system that require profound study. The present research was applied in terms of purpose and phenomenological in terms of method. The scope of research included the directors of digital education of public universities affiliated with Ministry of Science and Technology. Using purposive sampling method, 15 of them were selected for in-depth interviews. Creswell data analysis cycle was used to analyze the data. Data analysis showed that technical-economic and education challenges were the most important challenges of transitioning to virtual education. Technical-economic challenges were extracted in a general category under the title of "infrastructure". Educational challenges were categorized into eight categories respectively: The educational challenges were categorized into eight categories, respectively: "teachers' lack of preparation and unfamiliarity with virtual learning", "content production", "assessment and examination", "conducting practical lessons", "lack of interaction", "faculty and student dissatisfaction with central control", "time" and "student teaching". Finally, it must be said that although this virus left the most negative consequences in the face-to-face, educational, scientific and research activities of the university for at least one year; however, its fundamental opportunities and benefits will cause a revolution in education, especially virtual learning.
 

Keywords

  1. Ali Abadi, Kh; MoradiDoliskani, M; Moradi, R; & MohammadiGaledar, A. (2015). “Perceptual Characteristics of Students in e-Content of the Curriculum Mashhad University of Medical Sciences”. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences, 8(3), 179-185. Retrieved from http://edcbmj.ir/article-1-823-en.html
  2. Ashrafi, S; Arasteh, H; Zinabadi, H; & Abbasian, H. (2021). “Analyzing applied requirements for Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) in Payam Noor University from a Pedagogical perspective”. IRPHE, 27 (1), 51-87 RL: http://journal.irphe.ac.ir/article-1-4387-fa.html [in Persian].
  3. Bebbington, W. (2021). “Leadership strategies for a higher education sector in flux”. Studies in Higher Education, 46(1), 158-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1859686.
  4. Chekendi, F. (2020). “Online pandemic: A study of the challenges of English language professors at Birjand University in designing and implementing virtual teaching during the Quid 19 epidemic”. Journal of Linguistic Research in Foreign Languages, (4)10, 706-721 [in Persian].
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design (Third Edition). SAGE Publications.
  6. Doyumgaç, İ; Tanhan, A; & Kiymaz, M. (2021). “Understanding the Most Important Facilitators and Barriers for Online Education during COVID-19 through Online Photovoice Methodology”. International Journal of Higher Education, 10(1), 166-190. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?q=challenges virtual education higher education covid 19&pr=on&ft=on&id=EJ1286007.
  7. Finkle, T; & Masters, E. (2014). “Do MOOCs Pose a Threat to Higher Education?”, Research in Higher Education Journal, 26, 1-10. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1055324.
  8. Gamage, A. (2021). “An inclusive multifaceted approach for the development of electronic work-integrated learning (eWIL) curriculum”. Studies in Higher Education, 0(0), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 2021.1894116.
  9. Gay, L. R; Mills, G. E; & Airasian, P. W. (2011). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Addison-Wesley.
  10. Ghazi Saidi, L; Criffield, A; Kracl, C; McKelvey, M; Obasi, Sh; & Vu, P. (2020). “Moving from Face-to-Face to Remote Instruction in a Higher Education Institution during a Pandemic: Multiple Case Studies”. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4, 370-383. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.v4i4.169.
  11. Hosseini Largani, M. (2019). “Designing an innovative curriculum model in Iran's higher education system: A qualitative study”. IRPHE, 25 (3),27-49, URL: http://journal.irphe.ac.ir/article-1-4024-fa.html [in Persian].
  12. Johnson, H. (2015). Will Technology Kill Universities?. Retrieved from https://time.com/3747816/education-chalkboard-chatroom.
  13. Karademir, A. (2020). “Challenges of Higher Education Institutions against COVID-19: The Case of Turkey”. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 4(4), 453-474. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/? q=challenges virtual education higher education covid 19&pr=on&ft=on&id=EJ1282764.
  14. Lemoine, P.; & Richardson, M. (2020). “Planning for Higher Education Institutions: Chaos and the COVID-19 Pandemic”. Educational Planning, 27(3), 43-57. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?q=challenges virtual education higher education covid 19&pr=on&ft= on&pg=2&id=EJ1279907.
  15. Lincoln, Y.S; & guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. CA: sage.
  16. Moluayonge, G. (2020). “The Use of Modern Educational Technologies in Remote Learning in Higher Education during a Pandemic: The Case of COVID-19 in Cameroon”. Journal of Learning for Development, 7(3), 479-484. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?q=challenges virtual education higher education covid 19&pr=on&ft=on&pg= 3&id=EJ1280645.
  17. Moja, T. (2021). “National and institutional responses – reimagined operations – pandemic disruptions and academic continuity for a global university”. Studies in Higher Education, 46(1), 19-29. https://doi.org/ 1080/03075079.2020.1859688.
  18. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage.
  19. Passantino, F. (2021). “Reflections: diversity, inclusion and belonging in education Post-Covid”. Intercultural Education, 0(0), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2021.1857575.
  20. Perrotta, D. (2021). “Universities and Covid-19 in Argentina: from community engagement to regulation”. Studies in Higher Education, 46(1), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1859679.
  21. Pourkarimi, J & Alimardani, Z. (2020). “Factors affecting interactions in e-learning environments (a hybrid study)”. Information and communication technology in educational sciences, (11)41, 25-44 [in Persian].
  22. Rezaeerad, M. (2012). “Assessing the readiness of Payame Noor University professors to use e-learning”. Research in curriculum planning, (35)9, 110-116 [in Persian].
  23. Rice, M; Lowenthal, P.; & Woodley, X. (2020). “Distance education across critical theoretical landscapes: touchstones for quality research and teaching.” Distance Education, 41(3), 319-325. https://doi.org/ 1080/01587919.2020.1790091.
  24. Scott May, D. (2018). MEETING THE CHALLENGES OF MASSIVE OPEN ONLINE COURSES IN HIGHER EDUCATION. Pepperdine University.
  25. Smith, A. (2020). “Lessons from Yalta: Considerations for Post-COVID 19 Higher Education”. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Higher Education, 5(1), 113-117. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?q=challenges+virtual education+higher education+covid 19&pr=on&ft=on&pg=2&id=EJ1273084.
  26. Studebaker, B; & Curtis, H. (2021). “Building Community in an Online Doctoral Program”. Christian Higher Education, 20(1-2), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15363759.2020.1852133.
  27. Toquero, C. (2020). “Challenges and Opportunities for Higher Education Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Philippine Context”. Pedagogical Research, 5(4). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?q=challenges%2 bvirtual+education%2bhigher+education%2bcovid+19&pr=on&ft=on&id=EJ1263557.
  28. VanderStoep, S; & Johnston, D. (2009). Research Method for Everyday Life. Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.
  29. Wang, L; & DeLaquil, T. (2020). “The isolation of doctoral education in the times of COVID-19: recommendations for building relationships within person-environment theory”. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(7), 1346-1350. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 2020.1823326.
  30. World Bank Group. (2020, April). The COVID-19 Crisis Response: Supporting tertiary education for continuity, adaptation, and innovation. Retrieved from http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/621991586463915490/The-COVID-19-Crisis-Response-Supporting-Tertiary-Education-for-Continuity-Adaptation-and-Innovation.pdf.
  31. Yang, B; & Huang, C. (2021). “Turn crisis into opportunity in response to COVID-19: experience from a Chinese University and future prospects”. Studies in Higher Education, 46(1), 121-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1859687.
  32. ZakerSalehi, G. (2020). “Future Research on the Impact of the Covid Crisis 19 19 on Higher Education”. Interdisciplinary studies in the humanities, (12)46, 181-211 [in Persian].

  • Receive Date 07 December 2021
  • Accept Date 23 July 2022
  • Publish Date 23 September 2023