Analyzing the Challenges and Requirements of Supporting Talented and Outstanding Students in the Seventh Development Plan Act"

Authors
1 Assistant Professor, National Research Institute for Science Policy
2 Assistant Professor, Institute of Cultural and Social Studies, Tehran, Iran
10.61838/KMAN.IRPHE.32.1.1
Abstract
The present study was conducted with the aim of examining the challenges and operational requirements of supporting talented and outstanding students (as stipulated in Clause “B” of Article 96 of the Seventh Development Plan Act). Given the country’s needs and priorities for specialized human resources, particularly in certain fields, the necessity of supporting these students for the scientific and economic development of the country is undeniable. To this end, adopting a qualitative approach, data were collected through semi-structured interviews and expert panels, eliciting the views of 15 academic and executive experts in this field. The data analysis method employed was content analysis. According to the findings, the main challenges in implementing the provisions related to supporting talented and outstanding students in the Seventh Development Plan Act include: limited financial credits and lack of resources, insufficient coherence and coordination among policymaking and executive bodies responsible for student support, a mismatch between university majors and the capacities and needs of the labor market, and shortcomings in the continuity and comprehensiveness of the support provided to students. In this regard, the identified operational requirements include structural, policy-related, financial, executive, supervisory, and inter-sectoral requirements, each encompassing several sub-components. Among the key recommendations of this study for the effective implementation of Clause “B” of Article 96 are the drafting and ratification of a comprehensive law on supporting top talents, as well as the formulation of harmonizing policies across all executive and responsible bodies in the country.
Keywords
Subjects

References

Balakireva, E. I. (2018). Discovering and Supporting Gifted Students in Conditions of University Educational Environment. Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities, 23(177), 145-150. https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2018-23-177-145-150
Castellano, J. A., & Chandler, K. L. (2022). Identifying and Serving Diverse Gifted Learners. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003265412
Cavilla, D. (2014). Thoughts on access, differentiation, and implementation of a multicultural curriculum. Gifted Education International, 30(3), 281-287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429413486576
Cazco, S. (2024). Attention to special educational needs in highly gifted university students: impact on training and inclusivity. Migration Letters: an International Journal of Migration Studies, 21(S7), 1415-1426. https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v21iS8.9005
Farang, M., Ghahramani, M., Abolghasemi, M., & Alami, F. (2022). Identifying the dimensions and key components of employability of graduates of undergraduate behavioral sciences programs. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 28(4), 95-117. https://journal.irphe.ac.ir/article_705226.html?lang=en
Ford, D. Y., Wright, B. L., & Trotman Scott, M. (2020). A matter of equity: Desegregating and integrating gifted and talented education for under-represented students of color. Multicultural Perspectives, 22(1), 28-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2020.1728275
Gilson, C. M., & Lee, L. E. (2023). Cultivating a learning environment to support diverse gifted students. Gifted Child Today, 46(4), 235-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175231186454
Hafenstein, N. L., Boley, V., & Lin, J. (2022). State policy and funding in gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 45(4), 226-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175221110938
Haghi, K. M., & Fouladgar, M. (2014). Strategic planning for improving student welfare in Iran's higher education system (from the perspective of quality of life). Social Welfare Planning and Development, 5(18), 109-139. https://qjsd.atu.ac.ir/mobile/article_382.html?lang=en
Hatami, D., Kamali, H., & Roshan, A. (2023). A Study on the Experiences of Higher Education Good Governance in European and North America Countries; Some Lessons Gained for Higher Education in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 29(1), 161-186. https://doi.org/10.61838/irphe.29.1.7
Holsti, O. R. (2019). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities Trans - N. Salarzadeh Amiri. Allameh Tabataba'i University Press. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1573387449369524864
Hosseini Largani, M. (2025). Identifying and Ranking the factors of Student Choices for Universities and Academic Disciplines with the Most and Least Applicants Across Five Experimental Cohorts in National Entrance exams from 2017 to 2022. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 31(3), 123-141. https://doi.org/10.61838/KMAN.IRPHE.31.3.7
Hosseini, N., & Salimi, Q. (2025). Identification and analysis of students' competencies and responsibilities at Shiraz University in response to research guidance by advisors. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 31(2), 21-44. https://doi.org/10.61838/KMAN.IRPHE.31.2.2
Iman, M. T., & Noushadi, M. R. (2011). Qualitative content analysis. Research Quarterly, 3(2), 15-44.
Johnsen, S. K. (2022). The assessment standard in gifted education: Identifying gifted students. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003236863-4
Kiani, K., Shahriyaripour, R., Moradi, F., & Sadr, H. (2018). Structural modeling of factors affecting the tendency of elite students to migrate from the country (Case study: University of Semnan). Higher Education Letter, 11(44), 121-151. https://journal.sanjesh.org/mobile/article_34153.html?lang=en
Kronborg, L., & Cornejo-Araya, C. A. (2018). Gifted educational provisions for gifted and highly able students in Victorian schools, Australia. Universities Psychologica, 17(5), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy17-5.gepg
Lee, J., Kang, B., & Lee, D. (2016). Law for gifted and talented education in South Korea: Its development, issues, and prospects. Talent, 6(1), 14-23. https://theeducationjournals.com/index.php/talent/article/view/43
Lipovská, H., & Fischer, J. (2016). Gifted Students and Human Capital Accumulation. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 9(3), 60-69. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2016.090302
Mahdi, R. (2015). University students' quality of life: A case study of public universities in Tehran. Iranian Higher Education, 7(3), 1-26. http://ihej.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-26&slc_lang=fa&sid=1
Merry, M. S. (2008). Educational justice and the gifted. Theory and Research in Education, 6(1), 47-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878507086730
Mortazavi, H., Shahtalebi, B., & Karimi, F. (2022). A model of university students' quality of life with an emphasis on dimensions (research facilities, general facilities, and entrepreneurial opportunities). Strategies for Medical Science Education, 15(1), 69-78. https://edcbmj.ir/browse.php?a_id=2699&sid=1&slc_lang=en
Novak, A. M., Lewis, K. D., & Weber, C. L. (2020). Guiding principles in developing equity-driven professional learning for educators of gifted children. Gifted Child Today, 43(3), 169-183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217520915743
Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2024). Where are we now with the implementation of the talent development framework for gifted students and where do we go in the future? Education Sciences, 14(9), 932.
Pouratashi, M. (2018). Identification and support of gifted and talented students in the world and Iran (Specialized Reports on Higher Education, Issue.
Rawls, J. (1971). The Good of Justice
A Theory of Justice: Original Edition. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9z6v.13
Shahabadi, A., & Jamehbozorgi, A. (2013). The impact of the quality of the innovation system on elite migration in selected Middle Eastern countries. Journal of Economic and Developmental Sociology, 2(1), 73-101.
Suminar, D. R. (2024). Influencing Factors of Outstanding Student at University: A Scoping Review. Proceeding Series of Psychology, 2(1), 104-116. https://psikologi.unair.ac.id/proceeding-series-of-psychology/index.php/psp/article/view/61
Tabrizi, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis from the perspective of deductive and inductive approaches. Social Sciences Quarterly, 2(64), 105-138.
Yu, G., & Lee, D. J. (2008). A model of quality of college life (QCL) of students in Korea. Social Indicators Research, 87, 269-285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9172-9
Yu, G. B., & Kim, J. H. (2008). Testing the mediating effect of the quality of college life in the student satisfaction and student loyalty relationship. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 3(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-008-9044-8
 
 

  • Receive Date 13 January 2025
  • Accept Date 04 May 2025
  • Publish Date 21 March 2026