1. ABET (2015). Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). Retrieved from www.abet.org.
2. ABET (2015). Criteria for accreditation engineering programs, 2015-2016. Retrieved from www.abet.org.
3. ACM, C.M. (1992). ACM code of ethics and professional conduct. [Cited 2016].
4. Aronson, J. (1994). A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. The Qualitative Report, 2(1).
5. Augusti, G. (2009). EUR-ACE: The European Accreditation system of engineering education and its global context. In Engineering Education Quality Assurance (pp. 41-49). Springer US.
6. Boyatzis, R.E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code integrated approach. Working Futures Research.
7. Braun, V., & Clark, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77-101.
8. Castillo, J., Caruana, C. J., & Wainwright, D. (2011). The changing concept of competence and categorisation of learning outcomes in Europe: Implications for the design of higher education radiography curricula at the European level. Radiography, 17(3), 230-234.
9. CDIO (2000). Retrieved from www.cdio.org. [Cited 2016].
10. Eaton, J. S. (2006). An overview of US accreditation. Council for Higher Education Accreditation.
11. ENQA (2009). Standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European higher education area. 3rd Edition. Retrieved from www.enqa.eu [Publications; ESG] (accessed 2010/05/27).
12. European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education (ENAEE) (2015). Retrieved from www.enaee.eu.
13. Faiz, M., & Bahadori Nejad, M. (2010). Identifying appropriate professional competency of engineering graduates in Iran: Case study gradutes of Sharif University. (Doctoral dissertation) (in Persian).
14. Firmin, M. W. (2008). Tem. In the SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, Services, 5(2), 25-42.
15. Frost, N. (2011). Qualitative research methods in psychology: From core to combined approaches. McGraw-Hill international.
16. Gonczi, A., & Hager, P. (2010). The competency model. International Encyclopedia of Education, 8, 403-410.
17. Hanrahan, H. (2011). The Washington Accord Past, Present, Future.
18. Hooman, H.A. (2007). Research methodology in behavioral sciences. Samt Press (in Persian).
19. Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis (2015). Retrieved from www.iupui.edu.
20. International Engineering Alliance (2011). Glossary of Terms. Retrieved from http://www.ieagreements.org/
21. International Engineering Alliance. (2013). Graduate Attributions and professional competencies. Retrieved from http: // www.ieagreements.org.
22. International Engineering Alliance (2015). Best Practice in Accreditation of Engineering Programs. Retrieved from http://www.ieagreements.org/
23. International Engineering Alliance (2016). Retrieved from http://www.dublinaccord.org.
24. International Engineering Alliance (2016). Retrieved from http://www.sydneyaccord.org.
25. International Engineering Alliance (2016). Retrieved from http://www.washingtonaccord.org.
26. Jensen, H. T., Beso, A., Bollaert, L., Curvale, B., Harvey, L., Helle, E., & Sursock, A. (2008). Implementing and using quality assurance: Strategy and practice: A selection of papers from the 2nd European Quality Assurance Forum. European University Association.
27. Lansu, A., Boon, J., Sloep, P. B., & Van Dam-Mieras, R. (2013). Changing professional demands in sustainable regional development: A curriculum design process to meet transboundary competence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 49, 123-13.
28. Act for the Fifth Development Plan of the Islamic Republic of Iran (2011-2016). Retrieved from www. Rc.majlis.ir.
29. Lunt, B. M., Ekstrom, J. J., Gorka, S., Hislop, G., Kamali, R., Lawson, E., & Reichgelt, H. (2008). Curriculum guidelines for undergraduate degree programs in information technology. March, 2, 2009.
30. Memarian, H. (2013). Innovation in engineering education. University of Tehran Press (in Persian).
31. Ministry of Science, Research and Technology (2002). Educational program of IT engineering undergraduate.
32. Ministry of Science, Research and Technology (2013). Reviewed curriculum of computer engineering undergraduate.
33. Ministry of Science, Research and Technology (2000). Regulation the delegation of authority developing curriculum to university.
34. Ministry of Science, Research and Technology (2015). Educatiional regulation for undergraduate programs.
35. Mohamadi, R., Arefi, M., Bazargan, A., Pardakhtchi, M. H., & Fathi Vajargah, K. (2013). Designing a model for quality audit and feasibility study its implementionin university system of Iran. (Doctoral dissertation). Shahid Beheshti University, Faculty of Education (in Persian).
36. New Jersey Institute of Technology (2015). Retrieved from www.njit.edu.
37. Nazarzadeh Zare, M., & Pourkarimi, J. (2016). Designing and explaining a model of faculty members' competency in Tehran University by focusing on international interactions. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Tehran, Faculty of Psychology and education (in Persian).
38. Occupational Information Network (2016). Retrieved from https://www.onetonline.org.
39. Ranjbar, H., Haghdoost, A. A, Salsali, M., Khoshdel, M., Soleimani, M., & Bahrami, N. (2012). Sampling in qualitative research: A guide for beginning. J. Army Univ. Sci., 10 (3), 238-250.
40. Sarmad, Z., Bazargan, A., & Hejazi, E. (2015). Research methodology in behavioral sciences. Agah Press (in Persian).
41. Seoul Accord (2016). Retrieved from www.seoulaccord.com.
42. Supreme Council of Cultural Revolution. National Master Plan for Science and Eduation (2011). Retrieved from http://en.farhangoelm.ir.
43. University of North Texas (2015). Retrieved from http://www.unt.edu.
44. Yadegarzadeh, G.H., Fathi Vajargah, K., Mehrmohamadi, M., & Arefi, M. (2013). Designed and accreditation the job competencies of higher education curriculum specialists and evaluation doctoral curriculum. (Doctoral dissertation). Shahid Beheshti University, Faculty of Education (in Persian).
45. Yin, R.K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage Publications.