Author

Associate Professor, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Tehran University

Abstract

Developing an appropriate scientific and technical tool to analyze, examine and evaluate decisions, activities and performance of higher education units at different levels has been always a crucial issue and task. The purpose of this research was to explore and examine many types of essential applications of production function in analyzing higher education issues along with identifying facing problems and challenges. Using an analytical-critical approach in a comprehensive approach framework, the mission and nature of higher education are discussed.  Then, eleven strategic applications of the production function in the context of firm theory including identifying rational production region, prediction of outputs, evaluating the effects and share of production factors, evaluating efficiency and effectiveness of higher education units, examining the economies of scale, ranking universities, etcetera are proposed and elaborated. It is also specified that the applications are faced with a variety of problems and challenges such as the nature of multiple outputs of higher education, diversity of effecting factors, quality assessment challenges, hierarchical structure of data and activities, specification and identification of the function, appropriateness of estimation methods, and selection and endogeneity problems. The results indicated that ignoring the issues and problems critically affect the usefulness of the applications in policy making and administering decisions. At the end, ways to overcome most of the mentioned problems and challenges and the maximum use of applications in policy makings and decision makings are discussed.

Keywords

References
1. Abbott, M., & Doucouliagos, C. (2009). Competition and efficiency: Overseas students and technical efficiency in Australian and New Zealand Universities. Education Economics, 17 (1), 31–57.
2. Aitkin, M., & Longford, N. (1986). Statistical modelling issues in school effectiveness studies. J. Royal Statistics Soc., 149(2), 1-43.
3. Alemtabrizi, A., Saeidi, H., & Daylami-Moezi, S. (2011). Using DEA and AHP for evaluating the efficiency of faculties of Shahid-Beheshti University. Management Research, 89, 25-36 (in Persian).
4. Arnold, C. L. (1992). An introduction to hierarchical linear models. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 25, 58-90.
5. Barbaro, S. (2005). Equity and efficiency considerations of public higher education. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
6. Belzil, Ch. (2007). The return to schooling in structural dynamic models: A survey. European Economic Review, 51, 1059–1105.
7. Bowles, S. (1970). Towards an educational production function. In: W. Lee Hansen (ed.). Education, Income, and Human Capital (NBER, 1970).
8. Bratti, M., McKnight, A., Naylor, R., & Smith, J. (2004). Higher education outcomes, graduate employment and university performance indicators. J. R. Statist. Soc, A 167, 3, 475-496.
9. Bucciarelli, E., Mattoscio, N., & Alessi, M. (2013). What is essential is invisible to the eye: From neoclassical to cognitive perspective on production theory. G. & L. E. R., 17 (1).
10. Burstein, L. (1980). The analysis of multilevel data in educational research and evaluation. Review of Research in Education, 8, 158-233.
11. Casper, Ch. A., & Henry, M. S. (2001). Developing performance-oriented models for university resource allocation. Research in Higher Education, 42 (3), 353-376.
12. Chizmar, J. F., & Zak, T.A. (1983). Modeling multiple outputs in educational production functions. The American Economic Review, 73 (2), 18-22. Papers and Proceedings of the Ninety-Fifth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, May.
13. Chizmar, J. F., Jr., & McCarney, B.J. (1984). An evaluation of a \"trade-offs\" implementation using canonical estimation of joint educational production functions. The Journal of Economic Education, 15(1), 11-20.
14. Cobb, C. W., & Douglas, P. H. (1928). A theory of production. American Economic Review, 18, 139–165.
15. Colbeck, C. L. (1998). Merging in a seamless blend: How faculty integrate teaching and Research. The Journal of Higher Education, 69 (6), 647-671.
16. da Silva Freire, M. E., & da Silva, J. J. R. F.(1975). The application of production functions to the higher education system: Some examples from Portuguese Universities. Higher Education, 4(4), 447-460.
17. Dabagh, R. (2011). Comparative analysis of research productivity in selected State Universities in Iran. Iran’s Economic Research, 47, 75-104 (in Persian).
18. Dabagh, R., & Baradaran-e-Shoraka, H. (2009). Examining productivity and efficiency in 24 State Universities in Iran. Iran’s J. of Higher Education, 6, 1-33 (in Persian).
19. Del Rey, E. (2001). Teaching versus research: A model of state university competition. Journal of Urban Economics, 49, 356–373.
20. Dolan, R. C., & Schmidt, R. M. (1994). Modeling institutional production of higher education. Economics of Education Review, 13 (3), 197-213.
21. Douglas, P.H. (1976). The Cobb-Douglas production function once again: Its history, its testing, and some new empirical values.
22. Douglas, S., & Sulock, J. (1995). Estimating educational production functions with correction for drops. Journal of Economic Education, 26 (2), 101-112.
23. Eckles, J.E. (2010). Evaluating the efficiency of top liberal arts colleges. Res. Higher Education, 51,266–293.
24. Ehrenberg, R. G. (2004). Econometric studies of higher education. Journal of Econometrics, 121, 19 – 37.
25. Emadzadeh, M. (2003). Economics of education. Isfahan: Jahad Daneshgahi Press of Isfahan (in Persian).
26. Entezari, Y., Taee, H., & Arabmazr-e-yazdi, A. (2007). Analyzing production function and efficiency of knowledge firm using stochastic frontier analysis. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 13(3), 1-32 (in Persian).
27. Ezati, M., & Naderi, A. (2009). Impact of financial resource allocation mechanisms on the performance of university academic groups. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 15(2), 23-54 (in Persian).
28. Ferguson, C. E. (1990). Microeconomic theory. Irwin, R. D., Inc. (1966). Translated by Mahmood Rozbehan; Tehran: Center for University Press (in Persian).
29. Gander, J. P., & Tsui, L. (1999). Faculty gender effects on academic research and teaching courses and instruction affecting critical thinking. Research in Higher Education, 40 (2), 171-184.
30. Gautier, A., & Wauthy, X. (2007). Teaching versus research: A multi-tasking approach to multi-department universities. European Economic Review, 51, 273–295.
31. Glass, J. C., McKillop, D. G., & Hyndman, N. (1995). Efficiency in the provision of university teaching and research: An empirical analysis of UK universities. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 10, 61-72.
32. Goldstein, H. (1987). Multilevel models in educational and social research. London: Charles Griffin & Co.
33. Goldstein, H. (1997). Methods in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 8, 369-95.
34. Goldstein, H., & Woodhouse, G. (2000). School effectiveness research and educational policy. Oxford Review of Education, 26, 353-363.
35. Griffith, A., & Rask, K. (2007). The influence of the US news and world report collegiate rankings on the matriculation decision of high-ability students: 1995–2004. Economics of Education Review, 26, 244–255.
36. Gronau, R. (1974). Wage comparisons: A selectivity bias. J. of Pol. Economy, 82(6), 1119-43.
37. Growiec, J. (2008). Production functions and distributions of unit factor productivities: Uncovering the link. Economics Letters, 101, 87–90.
38. Hanushek, E. A. (1979). Conceptual and empirical issues in the estimation of educational production functions. J. of Human Resources, 14(3), 351-388.
39. Hanushek, E. A. (2010). Education production functions: Developed country evidence. In Peterson, P., Baker, E., McGaw, B.,(Editors), International Encyclopedia of Education. 2, 407-411, Oxford: Elsevier.
40. Hanushek, E. A., & Kimko, D. D. (2000). Schooling, labor force quality, and the growth of nations. American Economic Review, 90(5), 1184–1208.
41. Hanushek, E. A., Jamison, D. T., Jamison, E. A., & Wößmann, L. (2008). Education and economic growth: It’s not just going to school, but learning something while there that matters. Education Next, 8(2), 62-70.
42. Hausman, J. A., & Wise, D. A. (1977). Social experimentation, truncated distributions, and efficient estimation. Econometrica, 45(4), 919-938.
43. Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153-61.
44. Hopkins, D. S. P. (1990). The higher education production function: Theoretical foundations and empirical findings. In: Hoenack, Stephen A. & Collins, Eileen L. (Eds.). The economics of American Universities. State University of New York Press.
45. Horstschräer, J. (2012). University rankings in action? The importance of rankings and an excellence competition for university choice of high-ability students. Economics of Education Review, 31, 1162– 1176.
46. Johnes, J. (2006). Measuring the efficiency of universities: A comparison of multilevel modelling and data envelopment analysis. Bulletin of Economic Research, 58 (2), 75–104.
47. Johnson, J. L. (1978). The role of the student in the higher education production function. Research in Higher Education, 9 (2), 169-179.
48. Jones, K., & Duncan, C. (1995). Individuals and their ecologies: Analyzing the geography of chronic illness within a multilevel modelling framework. Health and Place, 1(1), 27-40.
49. Kershaw, J. A., & Mood, A. M. (1970). Resource allocation in higher education. The American Economic Review, 60 (2), 341-346. Papers and Proceedings of the Eighty-second Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, May.
50. Koshal, R., & Koshal, M. (1999). Economies of scale and scope in higher education: A case of comprehensive universities. Economics of Education Review, 18, 269–277.
51. Krueger, A. B. (1999). Experimental estimates of education production functions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 497-532.
52. Leyland, A. H., & Goldstein, H. (2002). Multilevel modelling of health statistics. New York: Wiley.
53. Ma’dandar-e Arani, A., & Sarkar-e Arani, M.R. (2009). Education and development: New topics in economics of education. Tehran: Nay Press (in Persian).
54. Marginson, S., & van der Wende, M. (2007). To rank or to be ranked: The impact of global rankings in higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11, 306-329.
55. Monk, D. H. (1989). The education production function: It\'s evolving role in policy analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11 (1), 31-45.
56. Motevaseli, M. (1995). Economic development in Japan focusing on manpower education. Tehran: Institute for Trade Research and Studies (in Persian).
57. Motevaseli, M., & Ahanchian, M. (2002). Economics of education. Tehran: SAMT (in Persian).
58. Naderi, A. (2001). Critical evaluation of methodological underpinnings of the empirics of human capital theory. Plan and Budget Bulletin, 60-61, 41-83 (in Persian).
59. Naderi, A. (2002, May). Multilevel models and their applications in economics. Proceedings of Conference on Non-linear Models. Tehran: Faculty of Economics of Alame University (in Persian).
60. Naderi, A. (2004). Economics of education. Tehran: Yastoroon Press (in Persian).
61. Naderi, A. (2007). Educational evaluation using comparative-efficiency approach: Capabilities and challenges. Proceedings of the Third Conference on Internal Evaluation of Quality in University System. Tehran: Center for Quality Evaluation of Tehran University (in Persian).
62. Naderi, A. (2008). Comparative-efficiency evaluation of university education: An appropriate approach for methodological challenges of quality improvement. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 14(1), 19-49 (in Persian).
63. Naderi, A. (2015). Advanced topics in economics of education. Tehran: University of Tehran Press (in Persian).
64. Naderi, A., & Abdolahi, H. (2010, April). Efficiency and effectiveness of the quality of university academic groups: Challenges and prospects. Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Internal Evaluation of Quality in University System. Tehran: University of Tehran (in Persian).
65. Naderi, A., & Mace, J. (2003). Education and earnings: A multilevel analysis. Economics of Education Rev, 22(2), 143-56.
66. Porter, S. R., & Umbach, P.D. (2001). Analyzing faculty workload data using multilevel modeling. Research in Higher Education, 42 (2).
67. Pritchett, L., & Filmer, D. (1999). What education production functions really show: A positive theory of education expenditures. Economics of Education Review, 18, 223–239.
68. Rogers, D.C., & Rochlin, H.S. (1991). Economics and education: Principles and applications. Translated by Husayniyon, S. A., Mashad: Austan-e Quds-e Razavi Press (in Persian).
69. Rothschild, M., & White, L. (1995). The analytics of pricing in higher education and other services in which customers are inputs. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 573–586.
70. Sameti, M., & Rezvani, M.A. (2001). Examining big state universities using DEA. Research Economic Bulletin, 59 (in Persian).
71. Sameti, M., Emadzadeh, M., & Baghteyari, B. (2003). Estimating higher education production function for state universities in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 9(1-2), 1-41 (in Persian).
72. Santos, J. L. (2007). Resource allocation in public research universities. Review of Higher Education, 30 (2), 125-144.
73. Shaikh, A. (1974). Laws of production and laws of algebra: The humbug production function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 56 (1), 115-120.
74. Shore, B. M., Pinker, S., & Bates, M. (1990). Research as a model for university teaching. Higher Education, 19 (1), 21-35 .
75. Simon, H. A. (1979). On parsimonious explanations of production relations. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 81 (4), 459-474.
76. Simon, H. A., & Levy, F. K. (1963). A note on the Cobb-Douglas function. Review of Economic Studies, XXX (2), 93-4.
77. Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-94.
78. Thieme, C., Prior, D., & Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2013). A multilevel decomposition of school performance using robust nonparametric frontier techniques. Economics of Education Review, 32, 104–121.
79. Tobin, J. (1958). Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica, 26, 24-36.
80. Todd, P. E., & Wolpin, K.I. (2003). On the specification and estimation of the production function for cognitive achievement. The Economic Journal, 113(485), F3-F33.
81. Varriale, R. (2001). Multilevel mixture models for the analysis of the university effectiveness. (Ph.D. Thesis). Universita degli Studi di Firenze.
82. Webster, T. J. (2001). A principal component analysis of the U.S. News & World Report tier rankings of colleges and universities. Economics of Education Review, 20, 235–244.
83. White, Sh. W. (2013). An experimentally confirmed resource planning model of services under production function uncertainties. Int. J. Production Economics, 141, 478–484.
84. World Bank (2009). Mongolia: Consolidating the gains, managing booms and busts, and moving to better. Service Delivery, Report No. 43353_MN.
85. Zellner, A., Kmenta, J., & Drèze, J. (1966). Specification and estimation of Cobb-Douglas production function models. Econometrica, 34 (4), 784-795.
86. Ziglari, F., Ghanadan, M., Ghoorchian, N., & Naderi, A. (2010). Examining the role of university in creating human capital and designing an appropriate model for the improvement of higher education system. Research and Curriculum Development, 27, 153-176 (in Persian).