فصلنامه پژوهش و برنامه ریزی در آموزش عالی
تحلیل تأثیر دانشگاه بر توسعه منطقه‌ای در ایران
نویسنده
دانشیار گروه اقتصاد آموزش عالی و بررسی های نیروی انسانی، مؤسسه پژوهش و برنامه ریزی آموزش عالی
چکیده
هدف مطالعه حاضر تحلیل تأثیر دانشگاه بر توسعه منطقه‌ای در ایران در چارچوب نظریه اکوسیستم منطقه‌ای توسعه دانش بنیان است. این تحقیق با رویکرد توصیفی انجام شده که از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر روش کمّی است. برای تحلیل تجربی اکوسیستم منطقه‌ای توسعه دانش بنیان و کمک دانشگاه به توسعه منطقه‌ای از داده‌های پنل استانی، تکنیک مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری و نرم افزار پی ال اس استفاده شد. نتایج تحقیق نشان داد که اکوسیستم توسعه دانش بنیان در استان های ایران شکل نگرفته است. بر این اساس، دانشگاه های استانی در ایران تأثیر درخور توجهی بر توسعه منطقه ای ندارند، چون دانشگاه ها نمی توانند فرایندها و قابلیت های پایه استان ها را به نوآوری، کارآفرینی و کسب و کارهای دانش بنیان تبدیل کنند؛ از طرف دیگر، اکوسیستمی وجود ندارد که ظرفیت جذب مناطق را بالا ببرد و فعالیت های دانشگاه ها را به نظام های اقتصادی، اجتماعی و فرهنگی پیوند دهد. بنابراین، تنها راه بهبود کمک دانشگاه ها به توسعه منطقه ای ساخت "اکوسیستم های توسعه مبتنی بر دانشگاه" است که همت دولت، دانشگاه ها و دیگر نهادهای ذی صلاح را طلب می کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Analyzing the impact of university on regional development in Iran
نویسنده [English]
- Yagoub Entezari
Institute for Research and Planning in Higher Education
چکیده [English]
The purpose of this paper was to analyze the impact of the university on regional development in Iran in the theoretical framework of the knowledge-based development ecosystem. This research was conducted with a descriptive approach, which is a practical and quantitative method. For the empirical analysis of ecosystem of the knowledge-based development and university assistance for regional development, the panel data of Iran’s provinces for three years, Structural Equations Modeling technique and PLS software was used. The results of the research showed that the knowledge-based development ecosystem in the Iranian provinces has not been formed. As a result, provincial universities in Iran do not have a significant impact on regional development. Because universities are unable to connect the basic processes and capabilities of the provinces to innovation, entrepreneurship and knowledge-based businesses. On the other hand, there is no ecosystem that increase regions’ capacity of attracting and connects university activities to economic, social and cultural systems. Therefore, the only way to improve the assistance of universities to regional development is to form “University-based Developmental Ecosystems”, which calls for the efforts of the government, universities, and other well-established institutions.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Regional Development
- University-based development
- Innovation Ecosystem
- Knowledge Ecosystem
- Entrepreneurship Ecosystem
2. Al-Mubaraki, H., Muhammad, A., & Busler, M. (2015). Innovation and entrepreneurship powerful tools for a modern knowledge-based economy. Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London.
3. Audretsch, D.B., & Feldman, M.P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86(4), 253-273.
4. Barnett, R. (2007). Recovering the civic university. In L. McIlrath and I. MacLabhrainn (eds.). Higher education and civic engagement: International perspectives (pp 25-36). Aldershot: Ashgate.
5. Barth, T.D. (2011). The idea of a green new deal in a quintuple helix model of knowledge, know- how and innovation. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD), 2(1).
6. Boland, J. (2006). Pedagogies for civic engagement in Irish higher education: Pprinciples and practices in context. In Sandén, M.L. and Zdanevicius, A. (eEds.). Democracy, citizenship and higher education: Ddialogue between universities and community. Kaunus, Lithuania: Vytautas Magnus University.
7. Brennan, J., & Naidoo, R. (2008). Higher education and the achievement (and/or prevention) of equity and social justice. Higher Education, 56 (3), 287-302.
8. Caniëls, M.C.J., & van den Bosch, H. (2010). The role of higher education institutions in building regional innovation systems. Papers in Regional Science, 90 (2), 271-286.
9. Carayannis, E.G., Barth, T.D., & Campbell, D.F.J. (2012). The quintuple helix innovation model: Global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1: 2.
10. Carayannis, E.G., & Campbell, D.F.J. (2014). Developed democracies versus emerging autocracies: Arts, democracy, and innovation in quadruple helix innovation systems. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 3:12.
11. Carayannis, E.G., & Campbell, D.F.J. (2011). Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems. New York, NY: Springer.
12. Carayannis, E.G., & Campbell, D.F.J. (2009). Mode 3 and ‘quadruple helix: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3), 201-234.
13. Carayannis, E.G., & Campbell, D.F.J. (2010). Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation, and environment relate to each other? International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41-69.
14. Carayannis, E.G., & Campbell, D.F.J. (2013). Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems: Quintuple Helix and social ecology. In EG Carayannis, IN Dubina, N. Seel, D.F.J. Campbell, & D. Uzunidis (Eds.). Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 1293-1300).
15. Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M., & Braczyk, H.J. (Eds) (2004). Regional innovation systems. 2nd ed. (London: Routledge).
16. Entezari, Y. (2015). Building knowledge-based entrepreneurship ecosystems: Case of Iran. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1206-1215.
17. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2001). The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university- industry - government relations. Research Policy, 29 (2), 109-123.
18. Grimaldi, M., Kenney, D.S., & Siegel, M.W. (2011). 30 years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40, 1045-1057.
19. Hock, H. et al. (2012). Fourth pillar in the transformation of production economy to knowledge economy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 530-536.
20. Huggins, R., & Johnston, A. (2009). The economic and innovation contribution of universities: A regional perspective. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space. 27(6), 1088-1106.
21. Kerr, C. (1982). The uses of the university. Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press.
22. Konstadakopulos, D. (2004). Learning for innovation in the global knowledge economy: A European and Southeast Asian perspective. Intellect Books Ltd.
23. Leydesdorff L. And Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Science and Public Policy 23, 279–286.
24. Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (2001). The transformation of university-industry-government relations. Electronic Journal of Sociology, 5, 338-344.
25. Madiès, T., Guellec, D., & Prager, J.C. (2014). Patent Markets in the Global Knowledge Economy: Theory, Empirics and Public Policy Implications. Cambridge University Press.
26. McCowan, T. (2012 a). Is there a universal right to higher education? British Journal of Educational Studies, 60 (2), 111-128.
27. McCowan, T. (2012 b). Opening spaces for citizenship in higher education: Three initiatives in English universities. Studies in Higher Education, 37 (1), 51-67.
28. Oketch, M.O. (2003). Market model for financing higher education in sub Saharan Africa: Examples from Kenya. Higher Education, 16 (3), 313-332.
29. Oketch, M., McCowan, T., & Schendel, R. (2014). The impact of tertiary education on development. A Rigorous Literature Review. Department for International Development.
30. Peters, M., Besley, T. (A.C.), & Araya, D. (2014). The new development paradigm: Education, knowledge economy and digital futures. Peter Lang Publishing, Inc., New York.
31. Rabelo, R.J., & Bernus, P. (2015). A holistic model of building innovation ecosystems. IFAC-Papers online 48-3 (2015) 2250–2257.
32. Singh, M. (2001). Reinserting the public good in higher education transformation. Kagisano, CHE Higher Education Discussion Series, No. 1, November.
33. Tilak, J.B.G. (2008). Transition from higher education as a public good to higher education as a private good: The saga of Indian experience. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 1(2), 220-234.
34. Trani, E.P., & Holsworth, R.D. (2010). The indispensable university higher education, economic development, and the knowledge economy. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
35. Trippl, M., Sinozic, T., & Smith, H.L. (2015). The role of universities in regional development: Conceptual models and policy institutions in the UK. Sweden and Austria. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1722-1740.
36. Valkokari, K. (2015). Business, innovation, and knowledge ecosystems: How they differ and how to survive and thrive within them.Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(8), 17. Retrieved from www.timreview.ca.
37. Zhang, J., & Liang, X.J. (2011). Business ecosystem strategies of mobile network operators in the 3G Era: The case of China mobile. Telecommunications Policy, 35 (2), 156-171.
)