فصلنامه پژوهش و برنامه ریزی در آموزش عالی
توسعه دیپلماسی علم و فناوری در ایران و تأثیرات نظام آموزش عالی بر آن
نویسندگان
1 دکترای مدیریت آموزش عالی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران
2 دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه خوارزمی
3 دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران
چکیده
هدف اصلی پژوهش حاضر شناسایی مؤلفههای توسعه دیپلماسی علم و فناوری در کشور ایران، بررسی وضعیت موجود آنها و شناسایی عوامل و ملاکهای ارتقا دهنده تأثیر نظام آموزش عالی بر آنها بود. روش پژوهش از نوع کاربردی و نحوه جمع‌آوری اطلاعات از نوع آمیخته اکتشافی بود و بهطور متوالی ابتدا از روش کیفی (مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته) و سپس روش کمّی (پرسشنامه محقق ساخته) استفاده شد.
نمونهگیری مصاحبه به روش هدفمند بود. جامعه آماری بخش کمّی اعضای هیئت علمی دانشگاه صنعتی خواجه نصیرالدین طوسی(253 نفر) بودند. برای تجزیه و تحلیل دادههای مصاحبه از روش تحلیل ساختاری، در پرسشنامه از روش تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی و برای بررسی وضعیت موجود مؤلفهها از آزمون t تک نمونهای استفاده شد. نتایج این پژوهش تعداد 3 بعد و 30 مؤلفه را برای توسعه دیپلماسی علم و فناوری در کشور و 5 عامل و 21 ملاک را برای افزایش میزان تأثیر نظام آموزش عالی در آن تبیین میکند. پیشنهاد اصلی برای آموزش عالی و سیاست خارجی، توسعه زیرساختها و ارتقای توافقنامههای بینالمللی در میان دانشگاهها و یافتن راهحلی برای چالشهای مشترک بهویژه در میان کشورهای همسایه است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Science and technology diplomacy improvement and the Impact of higher education
نویسندگان [English]
- Talieh Moghimi 1
- Hamidreza Arasteh 2
- Kamran Mohamadkhani 3
1 Doctoral Student, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran
2 Kharazmi University
3 Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran
چکیده [English]
This purpose of this study was to identify factors for developing science and technology diplomacy, assessing current situation and identification of factors and indicators for improving science and technology diplomacy. An applied and mixed research method was chosen for this study. Continuosly qualitative method (semi-structured interview) and a quantitative method (researcher-made questionnaire) were used. A purposive sampling method was chosen for this study. The statistical population in quantitative section was T. N. Toosi University of Technology Faculty members (n=253. A Structural analysis method was used for analysis of interviews. An exploratory factor analysis method was used for analysis of questionnaires data and one-sample t-test for examine current status. The results explained 3 dimensions and 30 components for the development of science and technology diplomacy, and 5 factors and 21 criteria for increasing the impact of higher education system on science and technology diplomacy in Iran. The main suggestion for higher education and foreign policy are developing infrastructure and upgrading the international agreements among universities, finding solution for shared challenges especially among neighbor’s countries.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- diplomacy
- Science Diplomacy
- Higher Education
- T.N. Toosi University of Technology
2. Ahmadi, H. (2012). The role of science and technology diplomacy in foreign policy in Islamic Republic of Iran. Thesis of International Relationship, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran, 44-21 (in Persian).
3. Arnove, R.F., & Torres, C.A. (2007). Comparative education: The dialectic of the globaland the local. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
4. Barati, M. (2011). A survey of science and technology diplomacy & current situation about that in I.R.I. 22 (in Persian).
5. Bazargan, A. (2009). Mix method research: The best approach for management studies. Journal of Management Knowledge, 21(81), 19-36 (in Persian).
6. Bedington, J. (2010). Diplomacy for science, new frontier for science. A Quarterly Publication from the AAAS Center for Science Diplomacy, 9.
7. Bidabad, B. (2012). Diplomacy principles: An Islamic sufi approach. International Journal of Law and Management (Emerald), 2-8.
8. Campbell, C. (2012). A consortium model for science engagement. DPRK Experience, 4.
9. Dehgan, A., & Colglazier, E. W. (2012). Development science and science diplomacy. A Quarterly Publication, the AAAS Center for Science Diplomacy, 11.
10. Heine, J. (2006). On the manner of practicing the new diplomacy. The Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI), Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
11. Iranshahi, H. (2012). Cultural diplomacy in I.R.I. Reports of Case Studies in Forign Affairs, 32 (in Persian).
12. Karimi, S., & Nasr, A.R. (2012). Interview data analyziz methods. Journal of Research, 4(7), 71-94.
13. Khaleghkhah, A., Zahed, B.A., & Karimi, Y.A. (2012). Pedagological science and the role of that in higher education internationalitation. International Conference on Borderless Higher Education Emprovement, Ferdowsi University Press, 4, (in Persian).
14. Kuus, M. (2016). Diplomacy and audit: Technology of knowledge in Europe. Science Direct Journal, (3), 22.
15. Lee, B., & House, Ch. (2010). Science diplomacy, new frontier in science diplomacy, navigating the changing balance in power. AAAS Press, 5, 16.
16. Miller, J., Celeste, R., & Rosen, J. (2013). Lessons in academic rescue: An international higher education response in post-war Iraq. A Quarterly Publication from the AAAS Center for Science Diplomacy, 2(3).
17. Mohd Shah, R., & Hashim, R. (2012). Advancing antarctica science diplomacy beyond traditional boundaries in developing environmental protection law. IEEE Symposium on Business, Engineering and Industrial Application, 12.
18. Mousavi, A.A.K., & Bakhtiari, A. (2012). Science and technology diplomacy. Nesha Journal, 2(2), 75-80 (in Persian).
19. Naderi, A., & Esmaeelnia, N. (2011). Higher education internationalization and university quality improvement. Papers of Quality Assasment in Higher Education System, Tehran University Press, 30 (in Persian).
20. Noordin, N. N., & Lokman, A. M. (2012). The use of international relation conceptual models to engage public diplomacy. IEEE Symposium on Humanities, Science and Engineering Research, 3-5.
21. Neureiter, N.P.,& Cheetham, M. (2013). The indo-U.S. science and technology forum as a model for bilateral cooperation. DPRK Experience, P.18.
22. Omidzamani, M. (2014). The science and technology place in new diplomacy. 7th Annual Conference of New Diplomacy and Foreign Policy of I.R.I., P. 83 (in Persian).
23. Ozdasli, E. (2015). Key trends, issues and solution of international relations education in Turkey. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 10.
24. Sadoq, M. (2015). A model for science and technology diplomacy development in Iran. Doctoral thesis in Science and Technology University, Tehran, Iran (in Persian).
25. Sattari, S. (2013). The opportunity for science and technology diplomacy. The Headquarters of The Islamic Summit Press (in Persian).
26. Shahramnia, A.M., & Nazifi N.N. (2013). The effect of globalization on cultural diplomacy. Journal of Culture Strategy, (24), 142-145 (in Persian).
27. Singhal, K.H., Banshal, S.K., Uddin, A., & Singh, V.K. (2015). A scientometric analysis of computer science research in India. IEEE Network,DOI: 978-1-4673-7948-9/15.
28. Skolnikoff, E.B. (2001). The political role of scientific cooperation. Technology in Society, 23, 461-471.
29. Turekian, V. C. (2014). The emergence of science diplomacy, Ch. 1, Science Diplomacy. University of Southern California, ISBN: 978-1-4507-4107-1.
30. Turekian, V. C., & Neureiter, N. P. (2012). Science and diplomacy: The past as prologue. Science & Diplomacy Journal, (33), 12.
31. Westcott, N. (2008). Digital diplomacy: The impact of the internet on international relations. Oxford Internet Institute, Research Report, (16), 8.
32. Yanjun, L., Sujian, W., Yangin, Sh., & Chenshengal, W. (2010). Year and applicable thoughts and measures of effect evaluation of the significant public science popularization activities in China. IEEE Press, 1-2.
)