فصلنامه پژوهش و برنامه ریزی در آموزش عالی
طراحی و اعتبارسنجی الگوی ارزیابی مرشدیت سازمانی در نظام آموزش عالی کشور
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی دانشگاه آزاد یاسوج
2 استادیار دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه آزاد کازرون
3 استادیار گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه آزاد یاسوج
چکیده
این پژوهش با هدف طراحی و اعتبارسنجی الگوی ارزیابی مرشدیت سازمانی در نظام آموزش عالی کشور انجام شد. این مطالعه از نظر فلسفی پژوهش تجربه گرایانه بود که با رویکردی قیاسی- استقرایی انجام شد و از نظر هدف در دسته پژوهش‌های اکتشافی است و از نظر روش و بازه زمانی گردآوری داده‌ها در دسته پژوهش‌های پیمایشی-مقطعی قرار می‌گیرد. همچنین چون از روش‌های کمّی و کیفی استفاده شده است، یک پژوهش آمیخته به‌شمار می‌آید. جامعه آماری این مطالعه در مرحله کیفی شامل استادان و خبرگان باتجربه آموزش عالی کشور است که با روش هدفمند از دیدگاه 11 نفر استفاده شد. همچنین در بخشی کمّی از دیدگاه 384 نفر از دانشجویان کارشناسی ارشد و دکتری آموزش عالی استفاده شد. در این مطالعه برای شناسایی مقوله‌های زیربنایی مرشدیت سازمانی از روش تحلیل مضمون و برای اعتبارسنجی مدل نیز از روش حداقل مربعات جزئی استفاده شد. داده‌ها با نرم‌افزارهای MaxQDA و Smart PLS تحلیل شد. نتایج نشان داد که ارزیابی مرشدیت سازمانی سنگ‌بنای دستیابی به شایستگی مرشد است. شایستگی مرشد موجب بهبود کیفیت روابط میان مرشد و مرید می‌شود و فعالیت‌ها و اقدامات اجرایی مرشدانه را بهبود می‌بخشد. بدین ترتیب، فرهنگ مرشدیت در نظام آموزش عالی بسط پیدا می‌کند و این به اثربخشی رفتارهای مرشدانه و افزایش حمایت‌های مرشدانه می‌انجامد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Designing and validating the organizational mentoring evaluation model in the higher education system in Iran
نویسندگان [English]
- Amin Abzan 1
- Shahram Hafezi 2
- Abdul Khaleq Gholami 3
1 PhD Student, Public Administration, Department of Management, Faculty of Humanities, Yasouj Branch of Azad University, Yasouj, Iran.
2 Assistant professor, Public Administration, Department of Management, Faculty of Humanities, Azad University, Kazerun Branch, Kazerun, Iran
3 Assistant professor, Public Administration, Department of Management, Faculty of Humanities, Yasouj Branch of Azad University, Yasouj, Iran.
چکیده [English]
This study was conducted with the aim of designing and validating a comprehensive model for evaluating organizational mentoring in the Iran’s higher education system. From a philosophical point of view, this study is an empirical research that was done with a deductive-inductive approach. From the perspective of purpose, it is in the category of exploratory research and from the perspective of method and time period of data collection, it is in the category of survey-cross-sectional research. It is also a mixed research because of the quantitative and qualitative methods used. The statistical population of this study in the qualitative section included 11 professors and experienced experts of higher education in Iran who were selected purposefully. Also, in a quantitative part, the point of view of 384 master and doctoral students of higher education was used. In this study, theme analysis method was used to identify the underlying categories of organizational mentoring. Partial least squares method was also used to validate the model. Data analysis was performed with MAXQDA and Smart PLS softwares. The results showed that the evaluation of organizational mentoring is the cornerstone of achieving the competency of a mentor. The competence of the mentor improves the quality of the relationship between the mentor and the mentee and improves the activities and practical actions of the mentor. In this way, the culture of mentoring develops in the higher education system, and this ultimately leads to the effectiveness of mentoring behaviors and increased mentoring support.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- evaluation model
- organizational mentality-higher education system
- mixed approach
2. Ahmadi, M., Nazemi, Sh., Rahimonia, F., & Mortazavi, S. (2014). Exploratory study of the components and dimensions of mentoring behavior from the perspective of oil industry managers. Quarterly Journal of Management of Government Organizations, 3 (9). 71-90 [in Persian].
3. Alvani, M., & Budlai, H. (2013). Phenomenology in entrepreneurship studies. Iranian Journal of Management Sciences, 5 (19), 33-61 [in Persian].
4. Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385-405.
5. Azar, A., Khosravani, F., & Jalali, R. (2019). Research in soft operations. Industrial Management Organization Publications [in Persian].
6. Banagar, A., Kiakjuri, d., & Mirtaqi. (2017). The Mediating Role of Employee Job Motivation in the Relationship between Mentoring and Organizational Entrepreneurship, Journal of Development and Transformation Management, 6 (28). 31-37 [in Persian].
7. Barthwal, A., Chenoweth, D., Day, C., Hughes, M., Kirk, E., Kitson, S., ... & Shellard, J. (2011). Pinnacle: Evaluation of the graduate teacher training program at the ANU. Australian Universities' Review, 53(1), 14-20.
8. Blackwell, R., & Blackmore, P. (2003). Towards strategic staff development in higher education. Maidenhead, England, published by SRHE & open university press.
9. Chin, W.W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295-33.
10. Cornelius, V., Wood, L., & Lai, J. (2016). Implementation and evaluation of a formal academic-peer-mentoring programme in higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(3), 193-205.
11. Creswell, J.W. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
12. Danaeifard, H., Alwani, M., & Azar, A. (2014). Qualitative research methodology in management: A comprehensive approach. Saffar Publications [in Persian].
13. Eghbali, A., Salehi, A., Ghaedi ,Y., & Mahmoudnia, A. ( 2021). A reflection on the basic features of liberating classroom components in higher education. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, (1), 27-50 [in Persian].
14. Etemadfar, A., Zarei, A., & Abbaspour, A. (2013). The effect of integrated mentoring based on strategic knowledge scaffolding on learning and retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 10 (31), 1-24 [in Persian].
15. George, M.P., & Mampilly, S.R. (2012), A model for student mentoring in business schools. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 1(2), 136-154.
16. Glasgow, P.P. (2006). The impact of culture on the mentoring process of students of African and East Indian heritage in postsecondary institutions in Trinidad. Oral Roberts University.
17. Hafeznia, M. (2015). Introduction to research methodology in humanities. Tehran: Samt Publications, Eighth Edition [in Persian].
18. Harris, T.M., & Lee, C.N. (2019). Advocate-mentoring: A communicative response to diversity in higher education. Communication Education, 68(1), 103-113.
19. Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
20. Hokanson, S.C., & Goldberg, B.B. (2018). Proactive postdoc mentoring. In The Postdoc Landscape (pp. 91-120). Academic Press.
21. Hokanson, S.C., & Goldberg, B.B. (2018). The postdoc landscape - Chapter 5 Proactive Postdoc Mentoring. Elsevier.
22. Holsti, O.R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities, Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.
23. Hsieh, B., & Nguyen, H.T. (2020). Identity-informed mentoring to support acculturation of female faculty of color in higher education: An Asian American female mentoring relationship case study. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 13(2), 169-188.
24. Hu, C., Wang, S., Wang, Y.H., Chen, C., & Jiang, D.Y. (2016). Understanding attraction in formal mentoring relationships from an affective perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 94, 104-113.
25. Jalali, R. (2012). Sampling in qualitative research. Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences, 1 (4), 310-320 (in Persian).
26. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications.
27. Laci, M.L. (2013). Examination of the interpersonal predictors of mentoring relational quality. Career Development International, 19(4), 2014, 381-403.
28. Laverick, D.M. (2016). Mentoring processes in higher education (pp. 1-84). Springer International Publishing.
29. Lunsford, L.G., Crisp, G., Dolan, E.L., & Wuetherick, B. (2017). Mentoring in higher education. The SAGE handbook of mentoring, 20, 316-334.
30. MacKie, D. (2014). The effectiveness of strength-based executive coaching in enhancing full range leadership development: A controlled study. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 66, 118-137.
31. Mihas, P., & Odum, I. (2019). Learn to use an exploratory sequential mixed method design for instrument development. SAGE Publications, Limited.
32. Mosleh, H., Neyestani, M., & Jahanian, A. (2016). The role of external evaluation on improving the quality of higher education system, Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 22 (4). 11-199 [in Persian].
33. Naderifar, M., Goli, H., & Qaljaei, F. (2017). Snowball a purposeful method in sampling qualitative research. Journal of Developmental Steps in Medical Education, 14 (41), 101-121 [in Persian].
34. Noorshahi, N. (2014). Factors affecting the professional growth of faculty members and presenting strategies for its improvement. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 20 (3), 95-120 [in Persian].
35. Perkins, R.D. (2009). How executive coaching can change leader behaviour and improve meeting effectiveness: An exploratory study. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 61, 298-318.
36. Pleschová, G., & McAlpine, L. (2015). Enhancing university teaching and learning through mentoring. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education.
37. Qolipoor, A., Lightweight, M., Master, R., & Naqvi, A. (2010). Guidance mechanism for alternative planning in the organization. Quarterly Journal of Management Research, 3 (9), 5-20 [in Persian].
38. Rangriz, H., Ebrahimi, R., Arasteh, H., & Soltanieh, F. (2017). Designing a strategic competencies model for functional managers using thematic analysis method. Educational Management Quarterly, 6 (96), 9-49 [in Persian].
39. Ranjbar, H., Haqdoost, A., Salsali, M., & Khoshdool, A. (2012). Sampling in qualitative research: A guide to getting started. Health and Military Sciences Research, 2 (3), 238-250 [in Persian].
40. Spiekermann, L., Lyons, M., & Lawrence, E. (2020). The ups and downs of mentoring relationship formation: What to expect. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105413.
41. Taleghani, Gh., & Vahed, A. (2017). A study of the relationship between organizational atmosphere power and mentoring. The First International Conference on Management Patterns in the Age of Progress, Tehran [in Persian].
42. Torrecilla Sánchez, E.M., Tinoco-Giraldo, H., & García-Peñalvo, F.J. (2020). E-mentoring in higher education: A structured literature review and implications for future research. Sustainability, 12(11), 4344.
43. Wang, W. (2011). A content analysis of reliability in advertising content analysis Studies. East Tennessee State University.
)